BUCK DOE v. ELAINE L. CHAO, SECRETARY OF LABOR (2004)

![]() |
BUCK DOE v. ELAINE L. CHAO, SECRETARY OF LABOR |
---|
Term: 2003 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 3, 2003 |
Decided: February 24, 2004 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Clarence Thomas |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • John Paul Stevens |
BUCK DOE v. ELAINE L. CHAO, SECRETARY OF LABOR is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 24, 2004. The case was argued before the court on December 3, 2003.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Virginia Western U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Privacy - Privacy (cf. libel, comity: privacy)
- Petitioner: Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Department or Secretary of Labor
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 540 U.S. 614
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: David Souter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes