Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
BUTTERS et al. v. CITY OF OAKLAND et al. (1923)

![]() |
BUTTERS et al. v. CITY OF OAKLAND et al. |
---|
Term: 1923 |
Important Dates |
Decided: November 12, 1923 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Pierce Butler • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • James Clark McReynolds • Edward Terry Sanford • George Sutherland • William Howard Taft • Willis Van Devanter |
BUTTERS et al. v. CITY OF OAKLAND et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on November 12, 1923.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taft Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
- Petitioner: State or local governmental taxpayer, or executor of the estate of
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 263 U.S. 162
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Howard Taft
- Who wrote the majority opinion: George Sutherland
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes