BYRON KEITH COOPER v. OKLAHOMA (1996)

![]() |
BYRON KEITH COOPER v. OKLAHOMA |
---|
Term: 1995 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 17, 1996 |
Decided: April 16, 1996 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
BYRON KEITH COOPER v. OKLAHOMA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 16, 1996. The case was argued before the court on January 17, 1996.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Oklahoma State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: miscellaneous (cf. loyalty oath), the residual code
- Petitioner: Person allegedly criminally insane or mentally incompetent to stand trial
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Oklahoma
- Citation: 517 U.S. 348
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes