Ballotpedia's Bold Justice 2-18-19: Incorrect quiz answer

• Justices
  • 
    CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS
  • ASSOCIATE JUSTICES
    • SAMUEL ALITO
    • AMY CONEY BARRETT
    • NEIL GORSUCH
    • KETANJI BROWN JACKSON
    • ELENA KAGAN
    • BRETT KAVANAUGH
    • SONIA SOTOMAYOR
    • CLARENCE THOMAS
• CASES BY TERM
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
  • Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
  • All earlier cases
• HISTORY OF THE COURT
  • Cases by chief justice
  • Cases by decade
• Recent vacancies
  • 2022 VACANCY AND JACKSON CONFIRMATION
  • 2020 VACANCY AND BARRETT CONFIRMATION
  • 2018 VACANCY AND KAVANAUGH CONFIRMATION
  • 2017 VACANCY AND GORSUCH CONFIRMATION

Incorrect

Sorry! You didn't pick the right answer.
We're sure you'll do better next time. Find the correct answer below.

SCOTUS trivia

SCOTUS heard arguments in 69 cases during its October 2017 term. One case sought to challenge earlier U.S. Supreme Court rulings prohibiting states from imposing sales taxes on merchants who sold products in the state but did not have any physical presence in the state.

Name that case!

(a) South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.
(b) Washington v. United States
(c) Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
(d) Ohio v. American Express

The correct answer: (a) South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. South Dakota passed a sales tax on internet merchants and then requested a declaratory judgment from a state court that internet merchants must comply with the tax. Citing U.S. Supreme Court caselaw, the lower court concluded and the state supreme court affirmed the sales tax was unconstitutional. South Dakota then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. In a 5 - 4 decision, the Supreme Court vacated the South Dakota Supreme Court ruling. Click here for more information about South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.