Bexar County, Texas, Proposition B, Increase Hotel Occupancy Tax to Fund San Antonio Spurs Arena Venue Project Measure (November 2025)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Bexar County Proposition B

Flag of Texas.png

Election date

November 4, 2025

Topic
County tax and Local hotel tax
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Referral


Bexar County Proposition B was on the ballot as a referral in Bexar County on November 4, 2025. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported increasing the county hotel occupancy tax to a maximum rate of 2%, for a combined rate of 17%, and using revenue from the county hotel tax and the county's short-term motor vehicle rental tax to fund the San Antonio Spurs Arena Venue Project.

A "no" vote opposed increasing the county hotel occupancy tax to a maximum rate of 2%, for a combined rate of 17%, and using revenue from the county hotel tax and the county's short-term motor vehicle rental tax to fund the San Antonio Spurs Arena Venue Project.


A simple majority vote was required to approve the measure.

Election results

Bexar County Proposition B

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

128,642 52.14%
No 118,068 47.86%
Precincts reporting: 100%
Election results are unofficial until certified. These results were last updated on November 5, 2025 at 12:33:36 AM Eastern Time.
Source


Overview

See also: Text of measure

What did Proposition B do?

Proposition B funded approximately $311 million worth of construction and development for a new arena for the San Antonio Spurs basketball team by increasing the hotel occupancy tax up to a maximum rate of 2%, for a combined rate of 17%, and dedicated revenue from the short-term motor vehicle rental tax, which is set at a rate of 5%, to the project.

What is Texas' hotel occupancy tax?

A hotel occupancy tax is a rate charged to guests for renting a room in a hotel, motel, or other short-term lodging. In Texas, all revenue generated from local hotel occupancy taxes may only be used to promote tourism and the convention and hotel industries. Additionally, local hotel occupancy tax revenue can be used for the development of stadiums, convention centers, or related infrastructure.[1]

Who was behind the campaigns surrounding the initiative?

As of October 27, about $7.2 million had been raised for and against Proposition B. Supporters received $2 million, while opponents received approximately $200,000.[2]

Support: Win Together, a political action committee that was aligned with the San Antonio Spurs, contributed approximately $7 million—100% of the campaign's total funds in support of Proposition B.

Opposition: Defending Public Money for Public Good PAC, which was a political action committee that is aligned with COPS/Metro Alliance, a group that is against using public money for private development, contributed approximately $220,000—100% of the campaign's total funds against Proposition B.

How was Proposition B related to Proposition A?

Proposition A provided renovations to the Frost Bank Center, which was the stadium for the San Antonio Spurs.

Support

Win Together led the campaign in support of Proposition B.[2]

Supporters

Officials

Corporations

  • San Antonio Board of REALTORS (SABOR)


Arguments

  • Bexar County Judge Peter Sakai: "The Frost Bank Center cannot become the next Astrodome. That can’t happen. We have an opportunity for growth by allowing the San Antonio Rodeo, which gives $12 million a year in scholarships to its community, to continue its commitment to the East Side."
  • Phil Cullen, Vice President of Basketball Organizational Development for the San Antonio Spurs: "Thousands of local jobs: construction, operations, small businesses will keep our focus on hiring locally, minority grown vendors, homegrown entrepreneurs. And here is the key, local taxpayers aren't paying more. These projects are funded through hotel and rental car taxes paid by visitors and by over $2 billion in private investment from the San Antonio Spurs. The largest in San Antonio's history, and we are covering all cost overruns."
  • Peter J. Holt, Managing Partner of the San Antonio Spurs: "Proposition B helps build a downtown arena that anchors a district designed for locals first. The result will be two campuses that complement each other with one city moving forward together."


Opposition

Defending Public Money for Public Good PAC led the campaign against Proposition B.[2]

Opponents

Former Officials

  • Attorney & Former Federal Prosecutor Susan Strawn (Nonpartisan)

Organizations

  • COPS/METRO Alliance
  • No Project Marvel


Arguments

  • Beverley McClure, a COPS/Metro leader with St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Parish & Rev. Dr. Jerry Dailey a COPS/Metro leader and pastor with Macedonia Baptist Church: "There has been no independent review, no public oversight and no guarantee that taxpayers will ever see a return on their investment. Across the country, billionaire owners and hedge funds promise jobs, economic growth and new development if taxpayers just foot the bill. Real independent studies show those promises rarely come true and always come with hidden costs to the taxpayer."
  • COPS/METRO Alliance: "Prop B would commit public tax revenues to subsidize a new downtown arena. We’re asking voters to vote NO because the deal prioritizes private profit over community needs and lacks true independent analysis."
  • Joshua Garcia, member of the Bexar County Young Democrats & Kelly Ann Gonzalez, former District 6 City Council Candidate: "Supporters of Proposition B say it will catapult San Antonio into world-class status, pointing to growth and job creation. Community advocates, however, warn that this project risks deepening inequities and eroding our identity. Both sides raise valid points. Until residents have a seat at the table, San Antonio should vote “Against” Proposition B and demand a deal that is forward-thinking and community built."
  • Sonia Rodriguez & Beatrice Cortez: "Proposition B is a tax increase as stated clearly on the ballot and starts a domino effect that would commit the city to hundreds of millions of more dollars in taxpayer money."
  • No Project Marvel: "Together, Prop A + Prop B = Over $1.3 BILLION in taxpayer giveaways. That’s money that should fix our streets, improve drainage, strengthen public safety, expand libraries and parks, and protect our water. Instead, it would subsidize rodeo halls and a luxury arena."


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition B was as follows:

THIS IS A TAX INCREASE.


Authorizing Bexar County, Texas to provide for the planning, acquisition, establishment, development, construction, or renovation of a new multipurpose arena designed primarily as the home venue for the San Antonio Spurs basketball team, and to be used for other purposes including, but not limited to, facilities for semi-professional, collegiate, and amateur basketball games, concerts, entertainment events, community events, and conventions (the “Arena Venue Project”), and related infrastructure, a venue project of the type described in and as authorized by Chapter 334, Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the “Act”) and as designated and described by the County's resolution dated June 10, 2025 (the “Resolution”); and (i) to increase the County hotel occupancy tax to a maximum rate of two percent (2%), for the purpose of financing the Arena Venue Project and approving the Resolution, pursuant to Subchapter H of the Act, and if approved, the maximum hotel occupancy tax rate imposed from all sources in Bexar County would be 17.00% of the price paid for a room in a hotel; and (ii) to authorize the use of the existing County short-term motor vehicle rental tax at a maximum rate of five percent (5%) on the gross rental receipts from the rental of motor vehicles in Bexar County, pursuant to Subchapter E of the Act, for the purpose of financing the Arena Venue Project, and approving the Resolution.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Media editorials

See also: 2025 ballot measure media endorsements

Support

The following media editorial board published an editorial supporting the ballot measure:

  • San Antonio Express-News Editorial Board: "The arrangement is an objectively sound and equitable deal that establishes a public-private approach to achieving the kind of bold vision for San Antonio’s urban core that has eluded our city for decades."


Opposition

The following media editorial boards published an editorial opposing the ballot measure:

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org.


Polls

See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2025 ballot measure polls
Bexar County, Texas, Proposition B, Increase Hotel Occupancy Tax to Fund San Antonio Spurs Arena Venue Project Measure (November 2025)
PollDatesSample sizeMargin of errorSupportOpposeUndecided
UT San Antonio
Question

"Next, we are going to show you the text of two propositions that will be on the November ballot. Please tell us if you plan to vote For or Against each proposition.

BEXAR COUNTY PROPOSITION - B

THIS IS A TAX INCREASE.

'Authorizing Bexar County, Texas to provide for the planning, acquisition, establishment, development, construction, or renovation of a new multipurpose arena designed primarily as the home venue for the San Antonio Spurs basketball team, and to be used for other purposes including, but not limited to, facilities for semi-professional, collegiate, and amateur basketball games, concerts, entertainment events, community events, and conventions (the 'Arena Venue Project'), and related infrastructure, a venue project of the type described in and as authorized by Chapter 334, Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the 'Act') and as designated and described by the County's resolution dated June 10, 2025 (the 'Resolution'); and (i) to increase the County hotel occupancy tax to a maximum rate of two percent (2%), for the purpose of financing the Arena Venue Project and approving the Resolution, pursuant to Subchapter H of the Act, and if approved, the maximum hotel occupancy tax rate imposed from all sources in Bexar County would be 17.00% of the price paid for a room in a hotel; and (ii) to authorize the use of the existing County short-term motor vehicle rental tax at a maximum rate of five percent (5%) on the gross rental receipts from the rental of motor vehicles in Bexar County, pursuant to Subchapter E of the Act, for the purpose of financing the Arena Venue Project, and approving the Resolution.'"

660 LV
± 3.80%
40.0%46.0%14.0%
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Path to the ballot

On February 4, 2025, the Bexar County Commissioners Court authorized County Judge Peter Sakai to negotiate with the City of San Antonio and the San Antonio Spurs on a Memorandum of Understanding for exploring the details of Proposition B. The Memorandum of Understanding was approved by the Commissioners Court on March 25, 2025.[3]

The Commissioners Court approved a motion directing the County Manager, David L. Smith, to prepare a draft resolution that described the proposal on May 27, 2025.[3]

On June 10, 2025, the Commissioners Court approved a motion to seek state approval for the proposition by a 4-1 vote, with Precinct 3 Commissioner Grant Moody voting against it.[4] The Office of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts determined that the approval and implementation of the resolution would have no significant negative impact on state revenue, thereby authorizing Bexar County to place the proposition on the ballot for voter consideration.[3]

Proposition B was put on the ballot through a vote of the Bexar County Commissioners Court on August 5, 2025.[5]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

How to vote in Texas


See also

Footnotes

  1. Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, "Local Occupancy Tax Overview," accessed October 24, 2025
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 San Antonio Report, "Pro-Spurs PAC has spent more than $7M to boost Props A and B," accessed October 27, 2025
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Bexar County Commissioners Court Agenda Coordination Form, August 5, 2025, accessed October 28, 2025
  4. San Antonio Business Journal, "County takes crucial step toward November Spurs arena vote," accessed October 28, 2025
  5. Bexar County Commissioners Court Agenda, August 5, 2025, accessed October 24, 2025
  6. VoteTexas.gov, "What's allowed at the polling place?" accessed December 23, 2025
  7. Texas Secretary of State, "Election Day – Closing the Polling Place Checklist ," accessed December 23, 2025
  8. 8.0 8.1 Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed December 23, 2025 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "request" defined multiple times with different content
  9. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed December 23, 2025
  10. Texas.gov, "Texas Voter Registration," accessed December 23, 2025
  11. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Automatic Voter Registration," accessed December 23, 2025
  12. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Online Voter Registration," accessed December 23, 2025
  13. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Same-Day Voter Registration," accessed December 23, 2025
  14. Texas Secretary of State, "Texas Voter Registration Application," accessed December 23, 2025
  15. Texas Constitution and Statutes, "Tex. Election Code Ann. § 18.068," accessed December 23, 2025
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  17. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  18. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  19. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  20. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  21. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 22.3 Texas Secretary of State, "Identification Requirements for Voting," accessed December 23, 2025