Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Bob Huff

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Bob Huff
Image of Bob Huff
Prior offices
California State Senate District 29

Diamond Bar City Council

Mayor City of Diamond Bar

California State Assembly District 60

Elections and appointments
Last election

June 5, 2018

Education

Bachelor's

Westmont College

Personal
Religion
Christian: Protestant
Profession
Business owner
Contact

Bob Huff (Republican Party) was a member of the California State Senate, representing District 29.

Huff (Republican Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent California's 39th Congressional District. He lost in the primary on June 5, 2018.

Huff is a former Republican member of the California State Senate, representing District 29 from 2008 to 2016. He served as Senate minority leader from 2012 to 2016. Huff did not seek re-election to the California State Senate in 2016. He was a candidate for District 5 representative on the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in California, but he was defeated in the primary election on June 7, 2016.

Prior to joining the California State Senate, Huff served in the California State Assembly from 2004 to 2008. He was a member of the Diamond Bar City Council from 1995 to 2004 and served two terms as mayor of Diamond Bar.

Biography

Huff obtained a B.A. in psychology from Westmont College.

Committee assignments

2015 legislative session

At the beginning of the 2015 legislative session, Huff served on the following committees:

2013-2014

At the beginning of the 2013 legislative session, Huff served on the following committees:

2011-2012

In the 2011-2012 legislative session, Huff serves on these committees:

2009-2010

In the 2009-2010 legislative session, Huff served on these committees:

Issues

Taxes

Sen. Tony Strickland blasted Democrats in June 2011 for not committing the recently discovered $6.6 billion additional state tax revenues to public safety and education. Public safety and education groups are the two in the state claiming to be hit the hardest with cuts. Strickland said it does not appear the money was spent wisely.

“Democrats would like to claim that this budget is about public safety and education,” Strickland said. “Let’s be clear: You can make no mistake that this budget is not about protecting public safety or education. If you extend these taxes, it’s going to mean more people out of work at a time when people can least afford it. If you vote for this, it will actually be a full year of tax increases even if people in September vote it down.”

In 2011, Republicans blocked the passage of a tax bill requiring a two-thirds vote (AB X1 18).

Immediately following the failed tax vote, Sen. President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg brought up a bill (SB 1X 23) that housed his local taxation bill (SB 653) and would allow local governments to bring local tax opportunities to a vote.

“I believe that it is another club to use over Republicans and our constituencies, saying, if you don’t do this bridge tax, if you don’t raise the taxes of people that have already said no, then we are going to have all these different taxes,” said Republican Sen. Bob Huff.

However Steinberg and other Democrats said they planned to allow local governments to fund their own public programs, especially if Republicans and voters rejected the tax extensions in 2011. Senate Bill 653 was a bargaining tool to get Republicans to go along with Jerry Brown’s tax extensions.

Under SB 653, local governments could pass local taxes increases on not just goods and services, but also on income taxes. In the course of the 2011 session, Democrats said they would create a local car tax, additional business taxes, property taxes and many different excise taxes on cigarettes, liquor, soda and even locally sold medical marijuana.[1]

Spending transparency

Huff is a sponsor of Senate Bill 719 which would require each state department and agency to publish a website that provides details on expenditures in a searchable format. He says, "Transparency is an essential component of democracy and allows taxpayers to hold public officials accountable for their actions. More public scrutiny will help reduce impropriety in dealing with taxpayer dollars - be it perceived or real."[2]

Legislative scorecard

Capitol Weekly, California's major weekly periodical covering the state legislature, publishes an annual legislative scorecard to pin down the political or ideological leanings of every member of the legislature based on how they voted on an assortment of bills in the most recent legislative session. The 2009 scores were based on votes on 19 bills, but did not include how legislators voted on the Proposition 1A (2009). On the scorecard, "100" is a perfect liberal score and "0" is a perfect conservative score.[3][4]

On the 2009 Capitol Weekly legislative scorecard, Huff ranked as a 9.[5]

The following table lists bills this person sponsored as a legislator, according to BillTrack50 and sorted by action history. Bills are sorted by the date of their last action. The following list may not be comprehensive. To see all bills this legislator sponsored, click on the legislator's name in the title of the table.


Elections

2018

See also: California's 39th Congressional District election, 2018

General election

General election for U.S. House California District 39

Gil Cisneros defeated Young Kim in the general election for U.S. House California District 39 on November 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Gil Cisneros
Gil Cisneros (D)
 
51.6
 
126,002
Image of Young Kim
Young Kim (R)
 
48.4
 
118,391

Total votes: 244,393
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 39

The following candidates ran in the primary for U.S. House California District 39 on June 5, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Young Kim
Young Kim (R)
 
21.2
 
30,019
Image of Gil Cisneros
Gil Cisneros (D)
 
19.4
 
27,469
Image of Phil Liberatore
Phil Liberatore (R)
 
14.3
 
20,257
Image of Andy Thorburn
Andy Thorburn (D)
 
9.2
 
12,990
Image of Shawn Nelson
Shawn Nelson (R)
 
6.9
 
9,750
Image of Bob Huff
Bob Huff (R)
 
6.2
 
8,699
Image of Sam Jammal
Sam Jammal (D)
 
5.4
 
7,613
Image of Mai Khanh Tran
Mai Khanh Tran (D) Candidate Connection
 
5.3
 
7,430
Image of Herbert Lee
Herbert Lee (D)
 
4.2
 
5,988
Image of Steve Vargas
Steve Vargas (R)
 
2.9
 
4,144
Suzi Park Leggett (D)
 
1.5
 
2,058
Image of John Cullum
John Cullum (R)
 
1.2
 
1,747
Karen Lee Schatzle (Independent)
 
0.6
 
903
Image of Steve Cox
Steve Cox (Independent)
 
0.6
 
856
Image of Andrew Sarega
Andrew Sarega (R)
 
0.6
 
823
Image of Sophia Alexander
Sophia Alexander (Independent)
 
0.4
 
523
Image of Ted Alemayhu
Ted Alemayhu (Independent American Party)
 
0.1
 
176

Total votes: 141,445
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Campaign advertisements
Oppose
"Huff Puff TV" - Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee ad, released May 7, 2018


2016 (County supervisor)

See also: Municipal elections in Los Angeles County, California (2016)

Los Angeles County held elections for county commission, district attorney, and special districts in 2016. The general election was held on November 8, 2016. A primary election was held on July 7, 2016. The candidate filing deadline for this election was on March 11, 2016. The following candidates ran in the Los Angeles County board of supervisors, District 5 primary election.[6]

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, District 5 Primary Election, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Kathryn Barger 29.64% 105,520
Green check mark transparent.png Darrell Park 15.50% 55,185
Bob Huff 14.71% 52,359
Ara James Najarian 13.08% 46,587
Mitchell Englander 12.03% 42,823
Elan Carr 11.40% 40,580
Billy Malone 2.44% 8,701
Raj Kahlon 1.20% 4,285
Total Votes 356,040
Source: Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk, "Primary Election Results," July 1, 2016

2016 (State legislature

See also: California State Senate elections, 2016

Elections for the California State Senate took place in 2016. The primary election was held on June 7, 2016, and the general election was held on November 8, 2016. The candidate filing deadline was February 25, 2016, for candidates filing with signatures. The deadline for candidates using a filing fee to qualify was March 11, 2016.[7] Incumbent Bob Huff (R) did not seek re-election.

Josh Newman defeated Ling-Ling Chang in the California State Senate District 29 general election.[8][9]

California State Senate, District 29 General Election, 2016
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Democratic Green check mark transparent.png Josh Newman 50.39% 160,230
     Republican Ling-Ling Chang 49.61% 157,732
Total Votes 317,962
Source: California Secretary of State


Ling-Ling Chang and Josh Newman defeated Sukhee Kang in the California State Senate District 29 Blanket primary.[10][11]

California State Senate, District 29 Blanket Primary, 2016
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Republican Green check mark transparent.png Ling-Ling Chang 44.01% 73,514
     Democratic Green check mark transparent.png Josh Newman 29.19% 48,754
     Democratic Sukhee Kang 26.80% 44,766
Total Votes 167,034

This district was included in the Republican State Leadership Committee's list of "16 in '16: Races to Watch." Read more »


2012

See also: California State Senate elections, 2012

Huff won re-election in the 2012 election for California State Senate District 29. He and Greg Diamond (D) advanced past the blanket primary on June 5, 2012, unopposed. Huff was victorious in the general election on November 6, 2012.[12][13][14]

California State Senate, District 29, General Election, 2012
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Republican Green check mark transparent.pngRobert "Bob" Huff Incumbent 55.1% 160,912
     Democratic Greg Diamond 44.9% 131,228
Total Votes 292,140

2008

See also: California State Senate elections, 2008

In 2008 Huff was elected to the California State Senate, District 29. He finished with 178,155 votes and was followed by Joseph Lyons with 127,536 votes and Jill Stone with 21,983 votes.[15] Huff raised $963,990 for his campaign fund.

California State Senate, District 29
Candidates Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Bob Huff (R) 178,155
Joseph Lyons (D) 127,536
Jill Stone (L) 21,983

Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Bob Huff campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2018U.S. House California District 39Lost primary$559,202 N/A**
2012California State Senate, District 29Won $1,581,432 N/A**
2008California State Senate, District 29Won $951,283 N/A**
2006California State Assembly, District 60Won $494,335 N/A**
2004California State Assembly, District 60Won $493,003 N/A**
1998California State Assembly, District 60Won $106,189 N/A**
** Data on expenditures is not available for this election cycle
Note: Totals above reflect only available data.

Scorecards

See also: State legislative scorecards and State legislative scorecards in California

A scorecard evaluates a legislator’s voting record. Its purpose is to inform voters about the legislator’s political positions. Because scorecards have varying purposes and methodologies, each report should be considered on its own merits. For example, an advocacy group’s scorecard may assess a legislator’s voting record on one issue while a state newspaper’s scorecard may evaluate the voting record in its entirety.

Ballotpedia is in the process of developing an encyclopedic list of published scorecards. Some states have a limited number of available scorecards or scorecards produced only by select groups. It is Ballotpedia’s goal to incorporate all available scorecards regardless of ideology or number.

Click here for an overview of legislative scorecards in all 50 states. To contribute to the list of California scorecards, email suggestions to editor@ballotpedia.org.









2016

In 2016, the California State Legislature was in session from January 4 through August 31. The formal session ended on August 31, but constitutionally the session adjourned sine die on November 30.

Legislators are scored by the American Council of Engineering Companies California on their votes on "issues important to the engineering and land surveying industry."
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the chamber.
Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to labor.
Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
Legislators are ranked on "how they voted in accord with CMTA."
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to the interests of seniors.
Legislators are scored on how they voted on tax and fiscal legislation.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to drug regulation policies.
Legislators are scored on their votes on LGBT issues.
Legislators and 2016 general election candidates are scored based on their responses to a questionnaire asking about "their opinions on the importance of the 2nd Amendment."
Legislators are scored on how they voted on taxpayer related issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to business issues.
Legislators are scored on bills related to reproductive health issues.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills that the coalition took a position on.
Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental policy.
Legislators are scored on their votes on issues "that determine a member’s adherence to conservative principles."


2015


2014


2013


2012

Personal

Note: Please contact us if the personal information below requires an update.
Huff and his wife, Mei Mei Huff, have four children.

See also

External links

Footnotes

Political offices
Preceded by
-
California State Senate District 29
2008–2016
Succeeded by
NA


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
Ami Bera (D)
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
Adam Gray (D)
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
Ro Khanna (D)
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
Jim Costa (D)
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
Raul Ruiz (D)
District 26
District 27
District 28
Judy Chu (D)
District 29
Luz Rivas (D)
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
Ted Lieu (D)
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
Young Kim (R)
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
Dave Min (D)
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
Democratic Party (45)
Republican Party (9)



Current members of the California State Senate
Leadership
Minority Leader:Brian Jones
Senators
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
S. Limón (D)
District 22
District 23
District 24
Ben Allen (D)
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
Democratic Party (30)
Republican Party (10)