Bruce Basson

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Bruce Basson
Image of Bruce Basson
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 3, 2020

Education

Bachelor's

Purdue University

Graduate

University of Wisconsin

Personal
Birthplace
Ames, Iowa
Religion
Non-Denominational
Profession
Clinical biostatistician
Contact

Bruce Basson (Libertarian Party) ran for election to the North Carolina House of Representatives to represent District 36. He lost in the general election on November 3, 2020.

Basson completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Email editor@ballotpedia.org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Bruce Basson was born in Ames, Iowa. Basson earned a B.S. in math from Purdue University in 1985, and an M.S. in statistics from the University of Wisconsin in 1990. His professional experience includes working as a clinical biostatistician.[1][2]

Elections

2020

See also: North Carolina House of Representatives elections, 2020

General election

General election for North Carolina House of Representatives District 36

Incumbent Julie von Haefen defeated Kim Coley and Bruce Basson in the general election for North Carolina House of Representatives District 36 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Julie von Haefen
Julie von Haefen (D) Candidate Connection
 
53.2
 
31,644
Image of Kim Coley
Kim Coley (R) Candidate Connection
 
43.1
 
25,656
Image of Bruce Basson
Bruce Basson (L) Candidate Connection
 
3.7
 
2,206

Total votes: 59,506
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

The Democratic primary election was canceled. Incumbent Julie von Haefen advanced from the Democratic primary for North Carolina House of Representatives District 36.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for North Carolina House of Representatives District 36

Kim Coley defeated Gil Pagan in the Republican primary for North Carolina House of Representatives District 36 on March 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Kim Coley
Kim Coley Candidate Connection
 
56.0
 
3,787
Image of Gil Pagan
Gil Pagan
 
44.0
 
2,975

Total votes: 6,762
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Libertarian primary election

The Libertarian primary election was canceled. Bruce Basson advanced from the Libertarian primary for North Carolina House of Representatives District 36.

Campaign finance

2018

See also: North Carolina State Senate elections, 2018

General election

General election for North Carolina State Senate District 17

Sam Searcy defeated incumbent Tamara Barringer and Bruce Basson in the general election for North Carolina State Senate District 17 on November 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Sam Searcy
Sam Searcy (D)
 
50.6
 
50,040
Image of Tamara Barringer
Tamara Barringer (R)
 
46.4
 
45,841
Image of Bruce Basson
Bruce Basson (L)
 
3.0
 
3,016

Total votes: 98,897
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for North Carolina State Senate District 17

Sam Searcy advanced from the Democratic primary for North Carolina State Senate District 17 on May 8, 2018.

Candidate
Image of Sam Searcy
Sam Searcy

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for North Carolina State Senate District 17

Incumbent Tamara Barringer advanced from the Republican primary for North Carolina State Senate District 17 on May 8, 2018.

Candidate
Image of Tamara Barringer
Tamara Barringer

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Bruce Basson completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Basson's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

As a professional scientist and father, I believe truth, justice, and compassion should guide my actions.

Government exists to protect all our rights, and I believe it needs to be smaller and more efficient than it is currently. Government should focus on doing a few things well:

1) national defense 2) administering equal justice 3) managing public spaces 4) providing last-resort charity for those not covered by private help.

Free markets are effective in providing everything else we need - food, clothing, shelter, education, and so on.

I believe the government must show fiscal responsibility and treat every citizen fairly, with equality before the law, and with respect, regardless of socioeconomic class.

I am anti-war, pro-environment, pro-liberty, pro-justice, and anti-government regulation.
  • Reducing zoning and regulatory restrictions to make housing more available and affordable.
  • Giving parents more control over education choices for example with "backpack budgeting" to encourage charter and alternative schools
  • Getting NC out of the liquor business by eliminating the ABC board
Including the examples above, I am passionate about focusing government on those things which free markets do not do well or do not do at all.

The justice system is an example. We do not want money to be involved in determining right and wrong; so a free market does not belong there. But as it stands, our current justice system is incredibly slow and convoluted, and compromised by wealthy special interests (i.e. highly-paid lawyers). We need to undertake extensive judicial reforms to regain our freedom. Along these lines, I am passionate about reducing prosecution for "victimless" crime. The drug war for example should be halted.

I am passionate about ending all sorts of wars. We should not be sending North Carolinians overseas to fight and die in Afghanistan when even the generals admit that they have forgotten why we are there.

Finally, we should take good care of our environment. Again, free markets have a spotty record when it comes to limiting pollution. I feel that is something we can only do through smart public policy.
I look up to the example of political leaders like George Washington and Nelson Mandela, not only because they were gifted leaders, but for the absolutely incredible action they took in voluntarily stepping away from political power. The tradition of giving up power has very ancient roots going all the way back to the Roman Republic and the example of Cincinnatus after whom the city of Cincinnati, OH is named. We should strive to remember and live up to such examples.

In a healthy society, government only uses its power to protect our rights, not compel people to follow an ideology. The Founders realized this when they set up the system of checks and balances to prevent governmental power from being concentrated in one place. Small, ideologically determined groups should not be able to make the rules for all of us. We The People should be furious with our politicians if they allow that to happen.

I also greatly admire the Eisenhower administration for paying off the debts incurred during World War II, funding the interstate highway system, and moving forward on civil rights. Government should be competent, efficient, transparent, predictable and low key - boring even! We need to return to technical competence in government.
An elected official must understand that government exists to protect all our rights. And before government takes any action, it should always remember the principle of "first, do no harm." Examples including seizing private property through civil asset forfeiture and government employees shooting innocent people reveals that some officials have lost sight of why they are there.

Elected officials must never tolerate a government that is violating people's rights. Citizens must always be treated with respect by the government. If that is not happening, elected officials must be willing to step up and make changes.

Everything the government does should be transparent to constituents, and elected officials should be the conduit for that information. Since all governmental authority comes from the people, the government cannot hide its actions from us. Government works for us - not the other way around.

Elected officials are stewards and trustees. They are elected as caretakers. Fighting with "other ideologies" is no part of their job description. Leaving a system of government behind which protects people's rights better than before MUST be their only goal - not raising money or getting re-elected or "scoring points" against opponents.
My motto is, "Do as you please, as long as you don't harm, impose on, or place others at risk without their consent." So I would like to leave behind a legacy of reasonable, small, efficient and effective government which protects all our rights and leaves other decisions up to individuals.

If we can convince ourselves to adhere to that principle, I believe that would achieve the best possible society we can imagine.
I have too many favorite books to list just one! One of the books that most influenced me was 'Free to Choose' by Milton and Rose Friedman which is just as relevant today as it was when it first came out in 1980. I also particularly love 'The Lives of a Cell' by Lewis Thomas, 'A Sand County Almanac' by Aldo Leopold, and 'Neutron Star' by Larry Niven.
No. Our democratic system of government is "of the people, by the people, and for the people." So everything the government does should be simple for ordinary people to understand.

Government is currently being used by many career politicians to advocate specific agendas, pay off their friends and special interests, and manipulate the public. At the same time, these politicians are ignoring basic needs like judicial reform which are critical. So no - I think we need more scientists, engineers, and ordinary working people in the legislature because I think legislatures dominated by career politicians become divorced from reality and no longer serve the public by protecting all our rights.
Since the 1950's, journalists and political scientists have noticed that there are far fewer relationships among legislators than there used to be. Legislatures have become split into ideological camps that don't really discuss and debate but rather rely on talking points and sound bites launched into the media. The various factions have decided to refuse to work together.

What this means is that, based on a narrow majority, whichever side is in power immediately tries to ram through an ideological agenda that the subsequent side, once they come into power, works just as hard to undo.

The partisan rancor has not gotten better over time. Clearly, for our system of government to work, there must be relationships among legislators. I feel that as I Libertarian, I am uniquely qualified for that role. I will agree with conservatives on some things, and with liberals on other things, always using common sense as my guide. I would be able to do a lot to bridge gaps and have relationships with legislators from all other parties and I think that would be very beneficial.
Districting should be done by independent, non-partisan boards using computational algorithms that can be proven to be unbiased. This is really a no-brainer - why are we even debating this issue? We have to make this change as soon as possible.

The other election reform that should be implemented is "ranked choice" or "instant runoff" voting to allow voters more options to vote for minor parties.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

2018

Ballotpedia biographical submission form

The candidate completed Ballotpedia's biographical information submission form:

What is your political philosophy?

Increase education quality, decrease healthcare spending, reduce business regulation.

Is there anything you would like to add?

It's time for a new political party![3]

—Bruce Basson[1]

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Information submitted on Ballotpedia’s biographical information submission form on November 3, 2018
  2. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on September 21, 2020
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.


Leadership
Speaker of the House:Destin Hall
Majority Leader:Brenden Jones
Minority Leader:Robert Reives
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
Bill Ward (R)
District 6
Joe Pike (R)
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
John Bell (R)
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
Ted Davis (R)
District 21
Ya Liu (D)
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
Vacant
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
Ben Moss (R)
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
Dean Arp (R)
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
District 81
District 82
District 83
District 84
District 85
District 86
District 87
District 88
Mary Belk (D)
District 89
District 90
District 91
Kyle Hall (R)
District 92
District 93
District 94
District 95
District 96
Jay Adams (R)
District 97
District 98
District 99
District 100
District 101
District 102
District 103
District 104
District 105
District 106
District 107
Aisha Dew (D)
District 108
District 109
District 110
District 111
District 112
District 113
District 114
Eric Ager (D)
District 115
District 116
District 117
District 118
District 119
District 120
Republican Party (70)
Democratic Party (49)
Vacancies (1)