Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Bryan County Board of Equalization v. Bryan County Board of Tax Assessors

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This Ballotpedia article needs to be updated.
This Ballotpedia article is currently under review by Ballotpedia staff as it may contain out-of-date information. Please email us if you would like to suggest an update.



Litigation.png

This Open Records and Transparency Project article is a sprout. You can help us collect information about this case, and other important FOIA cases across the country, by expanding this article.

Bryan County Board of Equalizationvs.Bryan County Board of Tax Assessors
Number: 253 Ga.App. 831
Year: 2001
State: Georgia
Court: {{{Court}}}
Other lawsuits in Georgia
Other lawsuits in 2001
Precedents include:
Sunshine Laws
How to Make Records Requests
Sunshine Litigation
Sorted by State, Year and Topic
Sunshine Nuances
Deliberative Process Exemption


Bryan County Board of Equalization v. Bryan County Board of Tax Assessors was a case before the Georgia Supreme Court in 2001 concerning open meetings law and their applicability to municipalities.

Background

Bryan County Bd. of Equalization v. Bryan County Bd. of Tax Assessors , 253 Ga.App. 831 (2001) (Andrews, J.): The Bryan County Board of Equalization held an open hearing to obtain evidence regarding a dispute over property value. The Board, however, closed the meeting to the public when it began its deliberations. The Board claimed that its deliberations were a quasi judicial function and, therefore, entitled to be in private.

The Court of Appeals ruled against the Board noting that the Open Meetings Act applies to al meetings of the Board. In response to the Board's claim that they were undertaking a quasi judicial function, the Court held: “We realize that ‘openness in sensitive proceedings is sometimes unpleasant, difficult, and occasionally harmful. Nevertheless, the policy of this state is that the public's business must be open.'”[1]


See also

Footnotes