Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

CANAL AND CLAIBORNE STREETS RAILROAD COMPANY, GARNISHEE, v. HART (1885)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
CANAL AND CLAIBORNE STREETS RAILROAD COMPANY, GARNISHEE, v. HART
Term: 1884
Important Dates
Argued: April 24, 1885
Decided: May 4, 1885
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Samuel BlatchfordJoseph BradleyStephen Johnson FieldHorace GrayJohn Marshall HarlanStanley MatthewsSamuel Freeman MillerMorrison WaiteWilliam Burnham Woods

CANAL AND CLAIBORNE STREETS RAILROAD COMPANY, GARNISHEE, v. HART is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 4, 1885. The case was argued before the court on April 24, 1885.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Louisiana U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Louisiana.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1880s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Waite Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - comity primarily removal cases, civil procedure (cf. comity, criminal and First Amendment); deference to foreign judicial tribunals
  • Petitioner: Debtor
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Creditor, including institution appearing as such; e.g., a finance company
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 114 U.S. 654
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Morrison Waite
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Samuel Blatchford

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes