Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
CARDONA v. POWER et al. (1966)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| CARDONA v. POWER et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1965 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: April 18, 1966 |
| Decided: June 13, 1966 |
| Outcome |
| Vacated and remanded |
| Vote |
| 7-2 |
| Majority |
| Hugo Black • William Brennan • Tom Clark • Earl Warren • Byron White |
| Concurring |
| John Harlan II • Potter Stewart |
| Dissenting |
| William Douglas • Abe Fortas |
CARDONA v. POWER et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 13, 1966. The case was argued before the court on April 18, 1966.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the New York State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1960s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Civil Rights - Voting Rights Act of 1965, plus amendments
- Petitioner: voter, prospective voter, elector, or a nonelective official seeking reapportionment or redistricting of legislative districts (POL)
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit
- Respondent state: New York
- Citation: 384 U.S. 672
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Brennan
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
