Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

CARLSON ET AL. v. LANDON, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE (1952)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
CARLSON ET AL. v. LANDON, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
Term: 1951
Important Dates
Argued: November 26, 1951
Decided: March 10, 1952
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
5-4
Majority
Tom ClarkRobert JacksonSherman MintonStanley ReedFrederick Vinson
Dissenting
Hugo BlackHarold BurtonWilliam DouglasFelix Frankfurter

CARLSON ET AL. v. LANDON, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 10, 1952. The case was argued before the court on November 26, 1951.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California California Southern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1950s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Vinson Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: First Amendment - federal or state internal security legislation: Smith, Internal Security, and related federal statutes
  • Petitioner: Alien, person subject to a denaturalization proceeding, or one whose citizenship is revoked
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Immigration and Naturalization Service, or Director of, or District Director of, or Immigration and Naturalization Enforcement
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 342 U.S. 524
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Frederick Vinson
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Stanley Reed

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes