Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

CARL THOMPSON v. PATRICK KEOHANE, WARDEN, et al. (1995)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
CARL THOMPSON v. PATRICK KEOHANE, WARDEN, et al.
Term: 1995
Important Dates
Argued: October 11, 1995
Decided: November 29, 1995
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
7-2
Majority
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedySandra Day O'ConnorAntonin ScaliaDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens
Dissenting
William RehnquistClarence Thomas

CARL THOMPSON v. PATRICK KEOHANE, WARDEN, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on November 29, 1995. The case was argued before the court on October 11, 1995.

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Alaska U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
  • Petitioner: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: Alaska
  • Citation: 516 U.S. 99
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes