Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC. v. SHUTE ET VIR (1991)

![]() |
CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC. v. SHUTE ET VIR |
---|
Term: 1990 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 15, 1991 |
Decided: April 17, 1991 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
7-2 |
Majority |
Harry Blackmun • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Byron White |
Dissenting |
Thurgood Marshall • John Paul Stevens |
CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC. v. SHUTE ET VIR is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 17, 1991. The case was argued before the court on January 15, 1991.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Washington Western U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Election of remedies: legal remedies available to injured persons or things
- Petitioner: Water transportation, stevedore
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 499 U.S. 585
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Harry Blackmun
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes