Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
CAROL HOWES, WARDEN, PETITIONER v. RANDALL LEE FIELDS (2012)

| CAROL HOWES, WARDEN, PETITIONER v. RANDALL LEE FIELDS |
|---|
| Term: 2011 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: October 4, 2011 |
| Decided: February 21, 2012 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed |
| Vote |
| 6-3 |
| Majority |
| Samuel Alito • Elena Kagan • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
| Dissenting |
| Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Sonia Sotomayor |
CAROL HOWES, WARDEN, PETITIONER v. RANDALL LEE FIELDS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 21, 2012. The case was argued before the court on October 4, 2011.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Miranda warnings
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Michigan
- Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 565 U.S. 499
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Samuel Alito
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes