Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. HARRINGTON (1916)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. HARRINGTON
Term: 1915
Important Dates
Decided: May 1, 1916
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
7-0
Majority
Oliver Wendell HolmesCharles Evans HughesJoseph McKennaJames Clark McReynoldsMahlon PitneyWillis Van DevanterEdward Douglass White

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. HARRINGTON is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 1, 1916.

In a 7-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Missouri State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Liability, other than as in sufficiency of evidence, election of remedies, punitive damages
  • Petitioner: Railroad
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 241 U.S. 177
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Charles Evans Hughes

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes