CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. BOHON (1906)

CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. BOHON
	Term: 1905
Important Dates
	Argued: December 15, 1905
	Decided: January 2, 1906
Outcome
	Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
	9-0
Majority
	David Josiah Brewer • Henry Billings Brown • William Rufus Day • Melville Weston Fuller • John Marshall Harlan • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • Rufus Wheeler Peckham • Edward Douglass White

CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. BOHON is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 2, 1906. The case was argued before the court on December 15, 1905.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Kentucky State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1900s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Fuller Court, click here.

^[1]

About the case

Subject matter: Judicial Power - comity primarily removal cases, civil procedure (cf. comity, criminal and First Amendment); deference to foreign judicial tribunals
Petitioner: Railroad
Petitioner state: Unknown
Respondent type: Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor
Respondent state: Unknown
Citation: 200 U.S. 221
How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
Who was the chief justice: Melville Weston Fuller
Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rufus Day

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.