Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
CITY OF CHICAGO, et al. v. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND et al. (1994)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| CITY OF CHICAGO, et al. v. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1993 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: January 19, 1994 |
| Decided: May 2, 1994 |
| Outcome |
| Affirmed (includes modified) |
| Vote |
| 7-2 |
| Majority |
| Harry Blackmun • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • Clarence Thomas |
| Dissenting |
| Sandra Day O'Connor • John Paul Stevens |
CITY OF CHICAGO, et al. v. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 2, 1994. The case was argued before the court on January 19, 1994.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Illinois Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Natural resources - environmental protection (cf. national supremacy: natural resources, national supremacy: pollution)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Illinois
- Respondent type: Environmental organization
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 511 U.S. 328
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
