Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
CITY OF CINCINNATI v. DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., et al. (1993)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| CITY OF CINCINNATI v. DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1992 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: November 9, 1992 |
| Decided: March 24, 1993 |
| Outcome |
| Affirmed (includes modified) |
| Vote |
| 6-3 |
| Majority |
| Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
| Concurring |
| Harry Blackmun |
| Dissenting |
| William Rehnquist • Clarence Thomas • Byron White |
CITY OF CINCINNATI v. DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 24, 1993. The case was argued before the court on November 9, 1992.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Ohio Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: First Amendment - Commercial speech, excluding attorneys
- Petitioner: City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit
- Petitioner state: Ohio
- Respondent type: Publisher, publishing company
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 507 U.S. 410
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
