Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
CIUCCI v. ILLINOIS (1958)
From Ballotpedia
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| CIUCCI v. ILLINOIS |
|---|
| Term: 1957 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: March 13, 1958 |
| Decided: May 19, 1958 |
| Outcome |
| Affirmed (includes modified) |
| Vote |
| 5-4 |
| Majority |
| Harold Burton • Tom Clark • Felix Frankfurter • John Harlan II • Charles Whittaker |
| Dissenting |
| Hugo Black • William Brennan • William Douglas • Earl Warren |
CIUCCI v. ILLINOIS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 19, 1958. The case was argued before the court on March 13, 1958.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Illinois State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1950s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Double jeopardy
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Illinois
- Citation: 356 U.S. 571
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
