Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
COMMISSIONERS OF WICOMICO COUNTY v. BANCROFT (1906)

![]() |
COMMISSIONERS OF WICOMICO COUNTY v. BANCROFT |
---|
Term: 1906 |
Important Dates |
Argued: October 9, 1906 |
Decided: November 5, 1906 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
8-0 |
Majority |
David Josiah Brewer • William Rufus Day • Melville Weston Fuller • John Marshall Harlan • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • Rufus Wheeler Peckham • Edward Douglass White |
COMMISSIONERS OF WICOMICO COUNTY v. BANCROFT is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on November 5, 1906. The case was argued before the court on October 9, 1906.
In an 8-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1900s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Fuller Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
- Petitioner: County government or county governmental unit, except school district
- Petitioner state: Maryland
- Respondent type: Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 203 U.S. 112
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Melville Weston Fuller
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rufus Day
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes