Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD (1961)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD
Term: 1960
Important Dates
Argued: October 11, 1960
Decided: June 5, 1961
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
5-4
Majority
Tom ClarkFelix FrankfurterJohn Harlan IIPotter StewartCharles Whittaker
Dissenting
Hugo BlackWilliam BrennanWilliam DouglasEarl Warren

COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 5, 1961. The case was argued before the court on October 11, 1960.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction).

For a full list of cases decided in the 1960s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: First Amendment - federal or state internal security legislation: Smith, Internal Security, and related federal statutes
  • Petitioner: Political candidate, activist, committee, party, party member, organization, or elected official
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Subversive Activities Control Board
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 367 U.S. 1
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Felix Frankfurter

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes