Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
CRAWFORD ALLEN, APPELLANT v. JOHN HAMMOND, APPELLEE (1837)

![]() |
CRAWFORD ALLEN, APPELLANT v. JOHN HAMMOND, APPELLEE |
---|
Term: 1837 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 30, 1837 |
Decided: February 3, 1837 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
7-0 |
Majority |
Henry Baldwin • Philip Pendelton Barbour • John McLean • Joseph Story • Roger Brooke Taney • Smith Thompson • James Moore Wayne |
CRAWFORD ALLEN, APPELLANT v. JOHN HAMMOND, APPELLEE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 3, 1837. The case was argued before the court on January 30, 1837.
In a 7-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Rhode Island U.S. Circuit for the District of Rhode Island.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1830s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Private Action - Contracts
- Petitioner: Agent, fiduciary, trustee, or executor
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Water transportation, stevedore
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 36 U.S. 63
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John McLean
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes