Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

CRICHTON v. WINGFIELD (1922)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
CRICHTON v. WINGFIELD
Term: 1921
Important Dates
Decided: February 27, 1922
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Louis Dembitz BrandeisJohn Hessin ClarkeWilliam Rufus DayOliver Wendell HolmesJoseph McKennaJames Clark McReynoldsWilliam Howard TaftWillis Van Devanter
Concurring
Mahlon Pitney

CRICHTON v. WINGFIELD is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 27, 1922.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York Southern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taft Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: jurisdiction (jurisdiction over non-resident litigants)
  • Petitioner: Advertising business or agency
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Heir, or beneficiary, or person so claiming to be
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 258 U.S. 66
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Howard Taft
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rufus Day

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes