Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

CROWN, CORK & SEAL CO., INC. v. PARKER (1983)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
CROWN, CORK & SEAL CO., INC. v. PARKER
Term: 1982
Important Dates
Argued: April 18, 1983
Decided: June 13, 1983
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanWarren BurgerThurgood MarshallJohn Paul StevensByron White
Concurring
Sandra Day O'ConnorLewis PowellWilliam Rehnquist

CROWN, CORK & SEAL CO., INC. v. PARKER is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 13, 1983. The case was argued before the court on April 18, 1983.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Maryland U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure including Supreme Court Rules, application of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in civil litigation, Circuit Court Rules, and state rules and admiralty rules
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Racial or ethnic minority employee or job applicant
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 462 U.S. 345
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Harry Blackmun

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes