California "Devolution" Panel Initiative (2016)
Not on Ballot |
---|
![]() |
This measure was not put on an election ballot |
Voting on Federal Constitutional Issues |
---|
![]() |
Ballot Measures |
By state |
By year |
Not on ballot |
The California Devolution Panel Initiative (#15-0006) did not make the November 8, 2016 ballot, as an initiated state statute.[1]
Introduction
The measure would have established the "New Hope for California Panel." The panel would have been tasked with investigating the effects of devolution on California and the collective United States. "Devolution" would have been defined as "the legal transfer of authority or jurisdiction from the United States federal government to the California state government." The panel would have called upon expert testimony, held public hearings, produced a publication of relevant findings twelve months from the first state the panel convenes or July 1, 2018, which ever is later, and produced publications annually thereafter.
The New Hope for California Panel would have had 12 members, including the California Lieutenant Governor, the Director of the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, the California Legislative Council, two additional members from the California Office of Legislative Council and eight additional expert panelists who aren't serving in government. The measure would have provided for legal defense.[1]
Text of measure
Ballot title:
Official summary:
- "Creates state panel of government officials and private experts to explore establishing California’s autonomy from the United States. Requires the panel to hold public hearings and take expert testimony, investigate impacts from California’s statehood, determine impact of establishing autonomy, submit a monthly report on its activities to the Legislature, and prepare an annual report of its findings."
Fiscal impact statement:
Note: The fiscal impact statement for a California ballot initiative authorized for circulation is jointly prepared by the state's legislative analyst and its director of finance.
- "Likely state costs of at least hundreds of thousands of dollars annually."
Background
Devolution
The panel would have explored the possibility of devolution, reminiscent of Scotland.[2] Devolution is, according to the BBC, "a process designed to decentralise government and give more powers," in the case of the United Kingdom, "to the three nations which, together with England, make up the UK."[3]
In September 2014, Scots voted on sovereign independence from the United Kingdom, but pro-independence forces came up about ten percentage points short. UK Prime Minister David Cameron (Conservative), in an attempt to encourage voters to reject independence, offered Scotland "maximum devolution," a term explicitly referenced in Sovereign California's initiative. Essentially, "maximum devolution" implies that Scotland would receive most government powers, except over foreign affairs and defense.[4]
Sovereign California's initiative defined "devolution" as "the legal transfer of authority or jurisdiction from the United States federal government to the California state government."[1]
Support
Sovereign California fronted the campaign in support of the Devolution Panel Initiative. The organization also supported the Resident Deportation Ban Initiative. Sovereign California also planned to propose multiple ballot initiatives “seeking to redefine the relationship between the United States and the California Republic.”[5] In addition to ballot initiatives, Sovereign California planned to seek to qualify a new political party, the California National Party.
Arguments
Sovereign California's "findings and declarations concerning California" section of the initiative stated:[1]
“ | (a) California's Gross State Product is comparable to the Gross Domestic Products of Russia and Brazil, and our economy is on track to overtake Brazil's as the world's seventh largest; (b) California is a major oil producer, comparable to Malaysia, and has over 2,900 million barrels of crude oil in reserves and 17 oil refineries with a capacity of 1.96 million barrels per calendar day. |
” |
Sovereign California's "findings and declarations concerning the Federal Government ofthe United States" section of the initiative stated:[1]
“ | (a) The Bureau of Land Management, the United States Forest Service, the Fish & Wildlife Service, and the National Park Service collectively own nearly half of the territory within California, restrict our access to these lands and unjustly deprive us ofthe natural resources that exist upon them; (b) The National Park Service has denied us access to forests which rightfully belong to the People of California. They are responsible for the mismanagement of these forests, resulting in millions of dollars in damage to California homes caused by otherwise preventable forest fires, and millions of dollars to the California state government; |
” |
Donors
One ballot measure campaign committee registered in support of the measure as of November 20, 2014:[7]
Committee | Amount raised | Amount spent |
---|---|---|
Sovereign California | $0 | $0 |
Total | $0 | $0 |
Path to the ballot
- See also: California signature requirements
- Louis J. Marinelli submitted a letter requesting a title and summary on February 20, 2015.
- A title and summary were issued by California's attorney general's office by April 28, 2015.
- 365,880 valid signatures were required for qualification purposes.
- Supporters had until October 26, 2015, to collect the signatures, but the measure failed on November 6, 2015.
See also
External links
Additional reading
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 California Attorney General, "Letter requesting a ballot title for Initiative 15-0006," February 20, 2015
- ↑ Sovereign California, "Our Message to the People of the California Republic," January 8, 2015
- ↑ BBC, "Devolution: A beginner's guide," April 29, 2010
- ↑ The Independent, "Scottish Independence: What is devo-max?" September 15, 2014
- ↑ Sovereign California, "About," accessed November 21, 2014
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ California Secretary of State Campaign Finance, "Sovereign California," accessed November 20, 2014
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |