Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
California 2022 local ballot measures
| California Local Ballot Measures | |
|---|---|
2023 »
« 2021
| |
 | |
| California ballot measures | |
| State measures | |
| Local measures | |
| 2022 ballot measures | |
| State measures | |
| Local measures | |
Ballotpedia covered local ballot measure across the state of California.
- On April 12, there were two local ballot measures in two jurisdictions.
- On May 3, there were two local ballot measures in two jurisdictions.
- On June 7, voters decided on 96 local ballot measures across the state.
- On August 30, voters in one jurisdiction decided a local ballot measure.
- On October 19, voters in one jurisdiction decided a local ballot measure.
- On November 8, voters decided on 470 local ballot measures across the state.
In 2022, Ballotpedia covered local ballot measures that appeared on the ballot for voters within the 100 largest cities in the U.S., within state capitals, and throughout California. You can review the coverage scope of the local ballot measures project here.
Ballotpedia covered a selection of policing-related ballot measures and election-related ballot measures outside of the largest cities.
Election dates
November 8
Alameda County
• Alameda, California, Measure E, Local Salaries Charter Amendment Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to increase the salaries of councilmembers to $1,200/year and the salaries of the mayor to $3,600/year and to limit the salaries of councilmembers and mayor to 30% of the average salary in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to increase the salaries of councilmembers to $1,200/year and the salaries of the mayor to $3,600/year and to limit the salaries of councilmembers and mayor to 30% of the average salary in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area. |
• Alameda, California, Measure F, Hotel Tax Increase Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing the hotel tax from 10% to 14% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the hotel tax from 10% to 14% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• Alameda County, California, Measure D, Floor Area Ratio Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported allowing a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas and a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for covered equestrian riding arenas in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas and a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for covered equestrian riding arenas in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas. |
• Albany, California, Measure K, Emergency Services Tax (Measure 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported repealing two current special emergency services taxes and adopting an Emergency Medical Services, Advanced Life Support, and Fire Protection Special Tax of $0.074 per square foot of land. |
A “no” vote opposed repealing two current special emergency services taxes and adopting an Emergency Medical Services, Advanced Life Support, and Fire Protection Special Tax of $0.074 per square foot of land. |
• Berkeley, California, Measure L, Housing and Infrastructure Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the city of Berkeley to issue $650,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund housing and infrastructure and requiring an estimated property tax levy of approximately $40.91 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the city of Berkeley to issue $650,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund housing and infrastructure and requiring an estimated property tax levy of approximately $40.91 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Berkeley, California, Measure M, Vacant Residential Property Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported establishing a tax of $3,000 on residential properties that are vacant for more than182 days of a year for the first year, then increasing the tax to $6,000 for each subsequent year, and then increasing to $12,000 for each subsequent year. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing a tax of $3,000 on residential properties that are vacant for more than182 days of a year for the first year, then increasing the tax to $6,000 for each subsequent year, and then increasing to $12,000 for each subsequent year. |
• Berkeley, California, Measure N, Low-Rent Housing Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported allowing any federal, state, or local public entity to establish 3,000 units of low-rent housing. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing any federal, state, or local public entity to establish 3,000 units of low-rent housing. |
• Emeryville, California, Measure O, Real Property Transfer Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing the real property transfer tax to $15/$1,000 for property sales between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000 and to $25/$1,000 for property sales above $2,000,000 with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the real property transfer tax to $15/$1,000 for property sales between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000 and to $25/$1,000 for property sales above $2,000,000 with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• Livermore, California, Measure P, Sewer System Usage Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported extending sewer services to permitted uses within the South Livermore Valley Area Plan Planning Area. |
A “no” vote opposed extending sewer services to permitted uses within the South Livermore Valley Area Plan Planning Area. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to issue $450,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to issue $450,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Oakland, California, Measure Q, Low-Rent Residential Units Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported allowing Oakland to establish 13,000 low-rent residential units. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing Oakland to establish 13,000 low-rent residential units. |
• Oakland, California, Measure R, Removal of Gender-Specific Language Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to remove gender-specific language. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to remove gender-specific language. |
• Oakland, California, Measure S, Noncitizen Residents Voting Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported allowing noncitizen residents who are parents, legal guardians, or legal caregivers of a public school student to vote for school board directors. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing noncitizen residents who are parents, legal guardians, or legal caregivers of a public school student to vote for school board directors. |
• Oakland, California, Measure T, Progressive Business Tax Rates Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported creating a progressive tax rate structure for business taxes. |
A “no” vote opposed creating a progressive tax rate structure for business taxes. |
• Oakland, California, Measure U, Public Facilities Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the city of Oakland to issue $850,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund public facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $71 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the city of Oakland to issue $850,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund public facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $71 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Oakland, California, Measure V, "Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance" Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the "Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance" to prohibit no-fault evictions for children and educators during the school year, extend eviction protections, and clarify other amendments. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the "Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance" to prohibit no-fault evictions for children and educators during the school year, extend eviction protections, and clarify other amendments. |
• Oakland, California, Measure W, Election Campaign Funding Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported creating a publican campaign finance program called Democracy Dollars in which eligible residents would be provided $25 vouchers from the city to donate to participating candidates. |
A “no” vote opposed creating a publican campaign finance program called Democracy Dollars in which eligible residents would be provided $25 vouchers from the city to donate to participating candidates. |
• Oakland, California, Measure X, Charter Amendments Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported changing the city charter to establish term limits for councilmembers, requiring two hearings before allowing the council to place measures on the ballot, counting absent councilmembers as "no" votes when determining if the mayor can break a tie, giving the Public Ethics Commission discretion for establishing councilmembers' salaries, allowing the Public Ethics Commission to set the salaries of the city attorney and auditor, and detailing the duties of the auditor. |
A “no” vote opposed changing the city charter to establish term limits for councilmembers, requiring two hearings before allowing the council to place measures on the ballot, counting absent councilmembers as "no" votes when determining if the mayor can break a tie, giving the Public Ethics Commission discretion for establishing councilmembers' salaries, allowing the Public Ethics Commission to set the salaries of the city attorney and auditor, and detailing the duties of the auditor. |
• Oakland, California, Measure Y, Zoo Parcel Tax (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel for 20 years for zoo upkeep. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel for 20 years for zoo upkeep. |
A “yes” vote supported renewing an annual parcel tax of $120 per parcel for 14 years for school maintenance. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing an annual parcel tax of $120 per parcel for 14 years for school maintenance. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Pleasanton Unified School District to issue $395,000,000 in bonds [with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $49 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Pleasanton Unified School District to issue $395,000,000 in bonds [with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $49 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Sunol Glen Unified School District to issue $10,900,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $52 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Sunol Glen Unified School District to issue $10,900,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $52 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Union City, California, Measure Z, General Services Sales Tax (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing a sales tax of 0.5% for 9 years with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing a sales tax of 0.5% for 9 years with revenue dedicated to general services. |
Alpine County
• Alpine County, California, Measure D, Prohibit Biomass Facility Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported prohibiting the construction of a biomass facility and prohibiting Alpine County from issuing permits or using public funds to analyze, study, or facilitate the construction of a biomass facility. |
A "no" vote opposed prohibiting the construction of a biomass facility and prohibiting Alpine County from issuing permits or using public funds to analyze, study, or facilitate the construction of a biomass facility. |
Amador County
A "yes" vote supported renewing the Amador County Vehicle Abatement Program, funded through a fee of one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles, for ten years. |
A "no" vote opposed renewing the Amador County Vehicle Abatement Program, funded through a fee of one dollar per vehicle and an additional two dollars for certain commercial vehicles, for ten years. |
• Amador County Unified School District, California, Measure H, Bond Issue (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported allowing Amador County Unified School District to issue $64 million in bonds and levy a parcel tax of $50 per $100,000 of assessed value to repair school infrastructure and build new school facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing Amador County Unified School District to issue $64 million in bonds and levy a parcel tax of $50 per $100,000 of assessed value to repair school infrastructure and build new school facilities. |
A "yes" vote supported changing the office of City Clerk to an appointive office rather than an elected office. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the office of City Clerk to an appointive office rather than an elected office. |
A "yes" vote supported changing the office of City Treasurer to an appointive office rather than an elected office. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the office of City Treasurer to an appointive office rather than an elected office. |
Butte County
- See also: Butte County, California ballot measures
• Butte County, California, Measure K, Vehicle Abatement Program Fee Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing the Butte County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees ($1 per vehicle and $3 per certain commercial vehicles) for 10 years to provide funding for the removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the Butte County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and associated fees ($1 per vehicle and $3 per certain commercial vehicles) for 10 years to provide funding for the removal and disposal of abandoned and wrecked vehicles. |
• Chico, California, Measure H, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 1% sales tax to provide funds for city services. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 1% sales tax to provide funds for city services. |
• Chico, California, Measure L, Public Nuisance Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported requiring city-owned property to be held to the same public nuisance laws as imposed on private landowners. |
A "no" vote opposed requiring city-owned property to be held to the same public nuisance laws as imposed on private landowners. |
• Gridley Unified School District, California, Measure J, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $16.3 million in bonds and levying a tax of $40.00 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $16.3 million in bonds and levying a tax of $40.00 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
Calaveras County
• Calaveras County, California, Measure A, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 1% sales tax in Calaveras County to provide funding to fire districts and fire departments through the fiscal year 2026-2027. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 1% sales tax in Calaveras County to provide funding to fire districts and fire departments through the fiscal year 2026-2027. |
• Calaveras Unified School District, California, Measure B, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $39.3 million in bonds and levying an estimated tax of $50 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $39.3 million in bonds and levying an estimated tax of $50 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
• Circle XX Community Services District, California, Measure C, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a $500 annual parcel tax for 10 years to provide road-related funding. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a $500 annual parcel tax for 10 years to provide road-related funding. |
• Mark Twain Union Elementary School District, California, Measure E, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $9.3 million in bonds and levying an estimated tax of $19.50 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $9.3 million in bonds and levying an estimated tax of $19.50 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
• Middle River Community Services District, California, Measure D, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported replacing the existing parcel tax of $100.00 per improved lot and $75.00 per unimproved lot with a new parcel tax of $200.00 per improved lot and $150.00 per unimproved lot. |
A "no" vote opposed replacing the existing parcel tax of $100.00 per improved lot and $75.00 per unimproved lot with a new parcel tax of $200.00 per improved lot and $150.00 per unimproved lot. |
Colusa County
• Colusa, California, Measure B, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 1% sales tax for four years to provide general funding. |
A "no" vote supported enacting a 1% sales tax for four years to provide general funding. |
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 0.5% sales tax to provide funding for emergency medical ground transportation services within the county. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 0.5% sales tax to provide funding for emergency medical ground transportation services within the county. |
• Williams, California, Measure C, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported enacting an additional 0.5% sales tax to provide general funding. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting an additional 0.5% sales tax to provide general funding. |
Contra Costa
• Brentwood, California, Measure Q, Open Space Overlay Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported creating an open space overlay, applying such overlay to designated areas, and prohibiting more intensive uses without a vote by the citizens. |
A “no” vote opposed creating an open space overlay, applying such overlay to designated areas, and prohibiting more intensive uses without a vote by the citizens. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing a special tax of up to $50 annually with revenue dedicated to maintenance and landscaping activities in the Crockett Community Services District. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing a special tax of up to $50 annually with revenue dedicated to maintenance and landscaping activities in the Crockett Community Services District. |
• Hercules, California, Measure N, Utility Tax Renewal Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing a utility users' tax of 8% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing a utility users' tax of 8% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “yes” vote supported setting the appropriations limit for the fiscal year of 2022-2023 for the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District at $5,399,362.00 and using this amount for fiscal years 2023-2024 through 2026-2027. |
A “no” vote opposed setting the appropriations limit for the fiscal year of 2022-2023 for the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District at $5,399,362.00 and using this amount for fiscal years 2023-2024 through 2026-2027. |
A “yes” vote supported repealing the 2005 Measure Z special tax. |
A “no” vote opposed repealing the 2005 Measure Z special tax. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to issue $450,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District to issue $450,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Martinez Unified School District to issue $90,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school modernization and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $39 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Martinez Unified School District to issue $90,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school modernization and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $39 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Pleasant Hill, California, Measure M, Office of City Treasurer Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported making the office of city treasurer an appointive position. |
A “no” vote opposed making the office of city treasurer an appointive position. |
• Richmond, California, Measure P, Rent-Control Increase Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the Municipal Code to allow the maximum rent increase on rent-controlled units to be the lower of 60% of the CPI or 3%. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the Municipal Code to allow the maximum rent increase on rent-controlled units to be the lower of 60% of the CPI or 3%. |
• Walnut Creek, California, Measure O, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for 10 years with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for 10 years with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Walnut Creek School District to issue $134,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $22 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Walnut Creek School District to issue $134,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $22 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
Del Norte County
• Crescent City, California, Measure T, Repeal 1% Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported repealing 2020's Measure S, which enacted a 1% sales tax within Crescent City to provide city funding. |
A "no" vote opposed repealing 2020's Measure S, which enacted a 1% sales tax within Crescent City to provide city funding. |
• Del Norte County, California, Measure U, Repeal 1% Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported repealing 2020's Measure R within the unincorporated area of Del Norte County to provide general county services funding. |
A "no" vote opposed repealing 2020's Measure R within the unincorporated area of Del Norte County to provide general county services funding. |
El Dorado County
• Black Oak Mine Unified School District, California, Measure Q, School Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Black Oak Mine Unified School District to authorize $28.9 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $39 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Black Oak Mine Unified School District to authorize $28.9 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $39 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Cameron Park, California, Measure J, Airport Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported raising the existing parcel tax from $300 to $900 per parcel (of land) per year in Cameron Park Airport District with revenue going to the operation of the airport and maintenance of residential streets. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the existing parcel tax from $300 to $900 per parcel (of land) per year in Cameron Park Airport District, thereby maintaining the existing rate of $300 per parcel. |
A "yes" vote supported enacting a $140 per parcel per year tax in the Highlands Village Lighting Zone of Benefit with funds going to street and highway lighting operations, replacing the $86 per parcel per year benefit assessment. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a $140 per parcel per year tax in the Highlands Village Lighting Zone of Benefit with funds going to street and highway lighting operations, replacing the $86 per parcel per year benefit assessment. |
A "yes" vote supported increasing the parcel tax limit from $300 dollars to $600 per parcel per year in the Knolls Property Owners Community Services District (adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index), with revenue going to road maintenance. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the parcel tax limit from $300 dollars to $600 per parcel per year in the Knolls Property Owners Community Services District (adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index), with revenue going to road maintenance. |
• El Dorado, California, Measure R, West Slope Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported increasing the hotel tax in El Dorado's West Slope from 10% to 12%, with revenue going to fund road maintenance. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the hotel tax in El Dorado's West Slope from 10% to 12%, with revenue going to fund road maintenance. |
• El Dorado, California, Measure S, Tahoe Area Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing Tahoe Area's hotel tax from 10% to 14%, with revenue going to fund snow removal and road maintenance in the area. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing Tahoe Area's hotel tax from 10% to 14%, with revenue going to fund snow removal and road maintenance in the area. |
A "yes" vote supported repealing resolutions for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, thereby repealing and refunding assessments levied on the El Dorado Hills Community Services District and Carson Creek Park Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District. |
A "no" vote opposed repealing resolutions for fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, thereby repealing and refunding assessments levied on the El Dorado Hills Community Services District and Carson Creek Park Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District. |
• Hickok Road Community Services District, California, Measure N, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported raising the parcel tax limit in the Hickok Road Community Services District from $200 to $400 per parcel per year, with revenue going to fund road maintenance. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the parcel tax limit in the Hickok Road Community Services District from $200 to $400 per parcel per year, with revenue going to fund road maintenance. |
• Lake Tahoe Unified School District, California, Measure K, School Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Lake Tahoe Unified School District to authorize $107 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $35 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Lake Tahoe Unified School District to authorize $107 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $35 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Lynx Trail Road Zone of Benefit, California, Measure M, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported enacting a $450 per parcel per year tax on land within the Lynx Trail Road Zone of Benefit to fund road maintenance within the zone, replacing the existing annual benefit assessment of $300. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a $450 per parcel per year tax on land within the Lynx Trail Road Zone of Benefit to fund road maintenance within the zone, replacing the existing annual benefit assessment of $300. |
• South Lake Tahoe, California, Measure G, Cannabis Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to enact a gross receipts tax of up to 6% on retail, distribution, and manufacturing and $20/square foot of canopy on cultivation for marijuana businesses, replacing the previous community benefit fee. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to enact a gross receipts tax of up to 6% on retail, distribution, and manufacturing and $20/square foot of canopy on cultivation for marijuana businesses, replacing the previous community benefit fee. |
Fresno County
• Clovis, California, Measure B, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported raising the hotel tax rate from the existing 10% to 12%, with funds directed to emergency and general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the hotel tax rate from the existing 10% to 12%, with funds directed to emergency and general city services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to issue $39,200,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of less than $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to issue $39,200,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of less than $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District to levy a tax of $48 per parcel, with funds directed to the district's sports programs and recreation department. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District to levy a tax of $48 per parcel, with funds directed to the district's sports programs and recreation department. |
• Fresno, California, Measure M, Sales Tax for Veteran Support Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported increasing the city's sales tax rate to 8.5%, with funds directed to the improvement of facilities and services for Fresno veterans. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the city's sales tax rate to 8.5%, with funds directed to the improvement of facilities and services for Fresno veterans. |
• Fresno County, California, Measure C, Continuation of Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported continuing an existing half-cent sales tax to fund county roads, bridges, transportation, and other county services for thirty years, expiring in 2057. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing an existing half-cent sales tax to fund county roads, bridges, transportation, and other county services for thirty years, expiring in 2057. |
A "yes" vote supported the establishment of a 0.2% sales tax in Fresno County, except for a reduced 0.025% sales tax in the city of Reedley, to fund various programs and facilities in California State University, Fresno. |
A "no" vote opposed the establishment of a 0.2% sales tax in Fresno County, except for a reduced 0.025% sales tax in the city of Reedley, to fund various programs and facilities in California State University, Fresno. |
• Kerman, California, Measure G, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 10% hotel tax with revenue directed to general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a 10% hotel tax with revenue directed to general city services. |
• Mendota, California, Measure H, General Transactions and Use Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a general transactions and use tax of 1.25% to fund general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a general transactions and use tax of 1.25% to fund general city services. |
• Orange Center School District, California, Bond Measure D, School Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $6 million bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $29 per $100,000 in assessed value for bond payments. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $6 million bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $29 per $100,000 in assessed value for bond payments. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Selma Unified School District to issue $36 million in bonds to fund school facilities improvements, and levying a property tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Selma Unified School District to issue $36 million in bonds to fund school facilities improvements, and levying a property tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the West Hills Community College District to issue $25.1 million in bonds to improve school facilities, and levy a property tax of $24.95 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the West Hills Community College District to issue $25.1 million in bonds to improve school facilities, and levy a property tax of $24.95 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the West Hills Community College District to issue $8.6 million in bonds to construct new facilities and other school changes, and levying a property tax of $9.35 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the West Hills Community College District to issue $8.6 million in bonds to construct new facilities and other school changes, and levying a property tax of $9.35 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
Humboldt County
• Arcata, California, Measure L, Utility Users Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing a 3% tax on utility service uses and continuing an electricity users tax at the rate of 45% on residential customers whose electricity usage exceeds 600% over the established baseline allowance. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing a 3% tax on utility service uses and continuing an electricity users tax at the rate of 45% on residential customers whose electricity usage exceeds 600% over the established baseline allowance. |
• Arcata, California, Measure M, Earth Flag Initiative (November 2022):
A "yes" vote supported requiring the City of Arcata to fly the Earth flag above all other flags. |
A "no" vote opposed requiring the City of Arcata to fly the Earth flag above all other flags. |
• Blue Lake, California, Measure R, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 1% sales tax for city services. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 1% sales tax for city services. |
• Ferndale, California, Measure N, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 0.75% sales tax to provide funds for city services until March 31, 2031. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 0.75% sales tax to provide funds for city services until March 31, 2031. |
• Ferndale Unified School District, California, Measure Q, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported issuing $7.7 million in bonds and levying a tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $7.7 million in bonds and levying a tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
• Rio Dell, California, Measure O, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing the city's sales tax with the percentage decreasing from 1.00% to 0.75%. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the city's sales tax with the percentage decreasing from 1.00% to 0.75%. |
• Trinidad, California, Measure P, Hotel Tax Increase Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the city's hotel tax rate from 8% to 12%. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the city's hotel tax rate from 8% to 12%. |
Imperial County
• El Centro Elementary School District, California, Measure C, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $17.505 million in bonds and levying a tax of $25 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $17.505 million in bonds and levying a tax of $25 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
• El Centro Elementary School District, California, Measure E, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $17.495 million in bonds and levying a tax of $25.00 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $17.495 million in bonds and levying a tax of $25.00 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
• Imperial, California, Measure G, Hotel Tax Increase Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the city's hotel tax from 8% to 12% to provide funding for general municipal services. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the city's hotel tax from 8% to 12% to provide funding for general municipal services. |
• Imperial Community College District, California, Measure B, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $130 million in bonds and levying a tax of $30 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $130 million in bonds and levying a tax of $30 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
• Imperial Unified School District, California, Measure D, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $50 million in bonds and levying a tax of $49.00 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $50 million in bonds and levying a tax of $49.00 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
Inyo County
- See also: Inyo County, California ballot measures
• Inyo County, California, Measure Q, Hotel Tax on Short-Term Rentals Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported extending the existing hotel tax imposed by the county to short-term rentals at a rate of 12% of the rent charged. |
A "no" vote opposed including short-term rentals under the county hotel tax. |
Kern County
- See also: Kern County, California ballot measures
• Bakersfield, California, Measure L, Fire and Police Chief Appointments Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the Bakersfield City Charter to remove the requirement that the fire chief and police chief be appointed from within their respective departments. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the Bakersfield City Charter to remove the requirement that the fire chief and police chief be appointed from within their respective departments. |
A "yes" vote supported establishing a parcel tax of $185 per parcel, with annual adjustments for inflation, in Bear Valley Community Services District to fund gate operations. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a parcel tax of $185 per parcel, with annual adjustments for inflation, in Bear Valley Community Services District to fund gate operations. |
• Bear Valley Community Services District, California, Measure W, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported establishing a parcel tax at a minimum rate of $500 per parcel, with an annual inflationary adjustment not exceeding 2%, to fund Bear Valley Community Service District services. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a parcel tax at a minimum rate of $500 per parcel, with an annual inflationary adjustment not exceeding 2%, to fund Bear Valley Community Service District services. |
• Edison School District, California, Bond Measure G, School Upgrades Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Edison School District to issue $3.4 million in bonds to fund general school upgrades, and levy a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Edison School District to issue $3.4 million in bonds to fund general school upgrades, and levy a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Fruitvale School District to issue $23 million in bonds to fund general school upgrades, and levying a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Fruitvale School District to issue $23 million in bonds to fund general school upgrades, and levying a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported limiting members of the Kern County Board of Supervisors to a maximum of two four-year terms, and applying the rule to both current and former supervisors so that they are unable to serve more than two additional terms. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing term limits for the Kern County Board of Supervisors that amount to a maximum of two four-year terms, and applying the rule to both current and former supervisors so that they are unable to serve more than two additional terms. |
• Kern County, California, Measure K, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 1¢ sales tax in unincorporated Kern County to fund general and emergency services, until ended by voters. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a 1¢ sales tax in unincorporated Kern County to fund general and emergency services, until ended by voters. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Kern High School District to issue $160 million in bonds to fund general school improvements, and levy a property tax of $19 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Kern High School District to issue $160 million in bonds to fund general school improvements, and levy a property tax of $19 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• McFarland, California, Measure M, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 1% sales tax that funds general city services and emergency services. |
A "no" vote opposed the creation of a 1% sales tax that funds general city services and emergency services. |
• McFarland, California, Measure O, Cannabis Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing an 8% tax on gross receipts for retail, 2.5% of gross receipts for testing labs, and 6% of gross receipts in other cannabis businesses to fund general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing an 8% tax on gross receipts for retail, 2.5% of gross receipts for testing labs, and 6% of gross receipts in other cannabis businesses to fund general city services. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Panama-Buena Vista Union School District to issue $99 million in bonds to fund general school facilities improvements, and levying a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Panama-Buena Vista Union School District to issue $99 million in bonds to fund general school facilities improvements, and levying a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Ridgecrest, California, Measure P, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 1% sales tax for 9 years to provide general and emergency city services funding. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 1% sales tax for 9 years to provide general and emergency city services funding. |
• Taft, California, Measure Q, Appointive City Clerk Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported making the office of city clerk in Taft appointive. |
A "no" vote opposed making the office of city clerk in Taft appointive. |
• Tehachapi, California, Measure S, Sales Tax Establishment Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 1¢ sales tax to fund general and emergency city services, until ended by voters. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a 1¢ sales tax to fund general and emergency city services, until ended by voters. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Tehachapi Valley Health District to enter into a new lease agreement with a nonprofit organization operated by Adventist Health for 30 years. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Tehachapi Valley Health District to enter into a new lease agreement with a nonprofit organization operated by Adventist Health for 30 years. |
• Wasco, California, Measure T, Appointive City Clerk Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported making the office of city clerk in Wasco appointive. |
A "no" vote opposed making the office of city clerk in Wasco appointive. |
• Wasco, California, Measure U, Appointive City Treasurer Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported making the office of city treasurer appointive. |
A "no" vote opposed making the office of city treasurer appointive. |
Kings County
- See also: Kings County, California ballot measures
• Avenal, California, Measure A, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% indefinitely, thereby raising the total combined sales tax rate in Avenal from 7.25% to 8.25%. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% indefinitely, thereby raising the total combined sales tax rate in Avenal from 7.25% to 8.25%. |
• Avenal, California, Measure C, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to tax marijuana retailers at a rate of $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by inflation) or 15% of gross receipts (whichever is more). |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to tax marijuana retailers at a rate of $25 per square foot (annually adjusted by inflation) or 15% of gross receipts (whichever is more). |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Kings River-Hardwick Elementary School District to issue $4 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Kings River-Hardwick Elementary School District to issue $4 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the West Hills Community College District to issue $8.6 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund new classrooms and labs and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $9.35 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the West Hills Community College District to issue $8.6 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund new classrooms and labs and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $9.35 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
Lake County
- See also: Lake County, California ballot measures
• Lakeport, California, Measure P, Annexation Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported Lakeport annexing 137 acres of unincorporated land south of the city. |
A "no" vote opposed Lakeport annexing 137 acres of unincorporated land south of the city. |
Lassen County
• Lassen County, California, Measure S, Regulation of Indoor Cannabis Sites Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported permitting indoor commercial cannabis cultivation sites in the unincorporated area of Lassen County, and establishing regulations. |
A "no" vote opposed permitting indoor commercial cannabis cultivation sites in the unincorporated area of Lassen County, and establishing regulations. |
• Susanville, California, Measure R, Cannabis Regulation Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported permitting commercial cannabis activities in Susanville, and establishing regulations. |
A "no" vote opposed permitting commercial cannabis activities in Susanville, and establishing regulations. |
Los Angeles County
• Arcadia, California, Measure CA, Election Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported changing the date of the general municipal election for the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November in even-numbered years to align with the Statewide General Election date; amending the procedure to fill vacant elective offices; changing the City Clerk from elected to appointed; establishing a City Prosecutor; modifying City procurement procedures; and making other modernizing amendments. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the date of the general municipal election for the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November in even-numbered years to align with the Statewide General Election date; amending the procedure to fill vacant elective offices; changing the City Clerk from elected to appointed; establishing a City Prosecutor; modifying City procurement procedures; and making other modernizing amendments. |
• Arcadia, California, Measure HT, Hotel Tax Maximum Rate Increase Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the maximum rate of the city hotel tax from 10% to 12%. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the maximum rate of the city hotel tax from 10% to 12%. |
• Arcadia, California, Measure SW, Sports Wagering Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a Sports Wagering Tax at a rate of 5%. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a Sports Wagering Tax at a rate of 5%. |
• Baldwin Park, California, Measure BP, Sales Tax For General Government Use Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a $0.0075 sales tax for general government use. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a $0.0075 sales tax for general government use. |
• Baldwin Park, California, Measure CB, Cannabis Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing cannabis retailers to sell and deliver medical cannabis and cannabis products to adults; establishing a sales tax with retailers paying a 0.5% tax and 4% tax on gross receipt from sales; and authorizing City Council to modify rates up to 5%.
|
A "no" vote opposed authorizing cannabis retailers to sell and deliver medical cannabis and cannabis products to adults; establishing a sales tax with retailers paying a 0.5% tax and 4% tax on gross receipt from sales; and authorizing City Council to modify rates up to 5%. |
• Baldwin Park, California, Measure CN, Campaign Contribution Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing campaign contribution limits and penalties lowering the maximum contribution to $750 per candidate/PAC per election. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing campaign contribution limits and penalties lowering the maximum contribution to $750 per candidate/PAC per election. |
• Baldwin Park, California, Measure RM, City Council Election Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported electing five Councilmembers to a 4 year term, with an annual sequential rotating of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore of the City Council. |
A "no" vote opposed electing five Councilmembers to a 4 year term, with an annual sequential rotating of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore of the City Council. |
• Baldwin Park, California, Measure TL, City Council Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing term limits, with three maximum terms (12 years) for a member of City Council and six maximum terms (12 years) for elected Mayor. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing term limits, with three maximum terms (12 years) for a member of City Council and six maximum terms (12 years) for elected Mayor. |
• Bell Gardens, California, Measure AA, City Council Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing three four-year term limits for councilmembers. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing three four-year term limits for councilmembers. |
A "yes" vote supported continuing the 2% Utility Users Tax. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the 2% Utility Users Tax. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Cerritos Community College to issue $425 million in bonds, levying $25 per $100,000 in assessed value, for the repair, replacement, and upgrade of facilities and infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Cerritos Community College to issue $425 million in bonds, levying $25 per $100,000 in assessed value, for the repair, replacement, and upgrade of facilities and infrastructure. |
• Claremont, California, Measure CT, Cannabis Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a tax on cannabis and hemp businesses, with a 4%-7% tax on gross receipts for retail business, and the higher of 1%-4% of gross receipts or $1-$10 per square foot for other businesses. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a tax on cannabis and hemp businesses, with a 4%-7% tax on gross receipts for retail business, and the higher of 1%-4% of gross receipts or $1-$10 per square foot for other businesses. |
• Commerce, California, Measure SL, City Council Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported modifying existing term limits for the City Council so that term limits allow for the extension of Council terms due to the change of election dates. |
A "no" vote opposed modifying existing term limits for the City Council so that term limits allow for the extension of Council terms due to the change of election dates. |
• Compton, California, Measure AM, City Council Required Meeting Reduction Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported reducing the required amount of monthly regular City Council meetings from four to two. |
A "no" vote opposed reducing the required amount of monthly regular City Council meetings from four to two. |
• Compton, California, Measure ED, Municipal Election Date Change Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported changing the dates of elections to coincide with established election dates, and make other technical changes to election procedures and terms of office. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the dates of elections to coincide with established election dates, and make other technical changes to election procedures and terms of office. |
• Compton Unified School District, California, Measure AAA, Facilities Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Compton Unified School District to issue $350 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Compton Unified School District to issue $350 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed property value. |
• Cudahy, California, Measure BA, Commercial Marijuana Regulation and Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a 15% gross receipts tax on marijuana retailers and restricting locations to 600 feet away from schools, churches, and childcare facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a 15% gross receipts tax on marijuana retailers and restricting locations to 600 feet away from schools, churches, and childcare facilities. |
• Culver City, California, Measure BL, Business License Tax (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing Culver City's business license tax to either $1,000 or 0.13%-0.35% of gross receipts depending on the business, 4% for oil well operations, and an additional .01% of gross receipts over $100 million dollars. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing Culver City's business license tax to either $1,000 or 0.13%-0.35% of gross receipts depending on the business, 4% for oil well operations, and an additional .01% of gross receipts over $100 million dollars. |
• Culver City, California, Measure VY, Voting Age Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported allowing residents at least 16 years of age or older to vote on city and school district candidates and ballot measures. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing residents at least 16 years of age or older to vote on city and school district candidates and ballot measures. |
• Downey, California, Measure D, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported increasing the city's hotel tax from 9% to 13%, with funds going to general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the city's hotel tax from 9% to 13%, with funds going to general city services. |
• Downey Unified School District, California, Measure K, School Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $504 million with bond revenue going to fund facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $504 million with bond revenue going to fund facility improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Duarte, California, Measure J, Healthcare Workers Minimum Wage Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported raising the minimum wage for healthcare workers to $25 per hour beginning on January 1, 2024; requiring annual increases to the minimum wage; and penalizing violations with a fine of up to $120 per worker per day. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the minimum wage for healthcare workers to $25 per hour beginning on January 1, 2024; requiring annual increases to the minimum wage; and penalizing violations with a fine of up to $120 per worker per day. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Eastside Unified School District to issue $23 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Eastside Unified School District to issue $23 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• El Monte, California, Measure OT, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported raising the hotel tax from 10% to 14% to fund general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the hotel tax from 10% to 14% to fund general city services. |
• El Segundo, California, Measure BT, Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported changing the tax formula for businesses, capping business license tax credits to $25,000, changing tax methods for hotels, increasing tax rates for unclassified businesses, and eliminating exemptions for non-profits and charities. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the tax formula for businesses, capping business license tax credits to $25,000, changing tax method for hotels, increasing tax rates for unclassified businesses, and eliminating exemptions for non-profits and charities. |
• El Segundo, California, Measure W, Commercial Cannabis Regulation Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported repealing the existing ban on commercial cannabis activities and adopting a city ordinance to regulate commercial cannabis retailers. |
A "no" vote opposed repealing the existing ban on commercial cannabis activities and adopting a city ordinance to regulate commercial cannabis retailers. |
• El Segundo, California, Measure Y, Marijuana Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported implementing a tax of up to $20 per square foot for cultivation and 10% of gross receipts for marijuana businesses with revenue dedicated to the city's general fund. |
A "no" vote opposed implementing a tax of $20 per square foot for cultivation and 10% of gross receipts for marijuana businesses. |
• Hawthorne, California, Measure I, Charter Adoption Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported adopting the charter, changing Hawthorne from a general law city to a charter city and setting council member compensation to $75,000 per year. |
A "no" vote opposed adopting the charter, changing Hawthorne from a general law city to a charter city and setting council member compensation to $75,000 per year. |
• Hermosa Beach, California, Measure B, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported raising the city's sales tax by 0.75% for a total sales tax rate of 10.25%. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the city's sales tax by 0.75% for a total sales tax rate of 10.25%. |
• Hermosa Beach, California, Measure M, Repeal Commercial Marijuana Ban Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing up to two marijuana dispensaries in Hermosa Beach. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing up to two marijuana dispensaries in Hermosa Beach. |
• Hermosa Beach, California, Measure T, Marijuana Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a tax of $20 per square foot for cultivation and 10% of gross receipts for marijuana businesses. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a tax of $20 per square foot for cultivation and 10% of gross receipts for marijuana businesses. |
• Hermosa Beach, California, Measure U, Repeal Existing Civil Service System Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported repealing Ordinance No. N.S. 211 (1960), thereby enabling the city council to adopt a new civil service system ordinance. |
A "no" vote opposed repealing Ordinance No. N.S. 211 (1960), thereby preventing the city council from adopting a new civil service system ordinance. |
• Huntington Park, California, Measure PP, Overnight Parking Permit Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an overnight parking permit program on public streets. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an overnight parking permit program on public streets. |
• Inglewood City, California, Measure HC, Healthcare Workers Minimum Wage Initiative (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported raising the minimum wage for healthcare workers to $25 dollars an hour, taking effect on January 1, 2024. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the minimum wage for healthcare workers to $25 dollars an hour, taking effect on January 1, 2024. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $340,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $36 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $340,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $36 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Long Beach, California, Measure BB, Water and Gas Utility Public Merger Amendment (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to merge existing water and gas utilities into one publicly operated entity, governed by the existing Water/Utility Commission. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to merge existing water and gas utilities into one publicly operated entity, governed by the existing Water/Utility Commission. |
• Long Beach, California, Measure E, Police Oversight Commission Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a police oversight commission in the city to modify police practices and policies. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a police oversight commission in the city to modify police practices and policies. |
A "yes" vote supported changing the city charter to align the primary and general election dates of the city with that of state’s in even-numbered years. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the city charter to align the primary and general election dates of the city with that of state’s in even-numbered years. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the local charter to align primary and general election dates with that of the state on even years. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the local charter to align primary and general election dates with that of the state on even years. |
• Long Beach Unified School District, California, Measure Q, School Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Long Beach Unified School District to issue $1.7 billion in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Long Beach Unified School District to issue $1.7 billion in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Los Angeles, California, Proposition LH, Low-Income Rental Housing Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to develop up to an additional 5,000 low-income rental housing units per city council district for a total of 75,000 additional units. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to develop up to an additional 5,000 low-income rental housing units per district, thereby maintaining the existing limit of 3,000 units adopted in 2008. |
• Los Angeles, California, Proposition SP, Parks and Recreation Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.084 per square foot on improved parcels to fund parks and recreational facilities for 30 years. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.084 per square foot on improved parcels to fund parks and recreational facilities for 30 years. |
• Los Angeles, California, Proposition ULA, Tax on $5 Million House Sales Initiative (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported a ballot initiative to:
|
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 4% tax on properties sold or transferred for more than $5 million and a 5.5% tax on properties sold or transferred for more than $10 million. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Los Angeles Community College District to issue $5.3 billion in bonds to fund facility renovations and job training programs and authorizing the district to levy a tax at a rate of $25 per $100,000 of assessed value to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Los Angeles Community College District to issue $5.3 billion in bonds to fund facility renovations and job training programs and authorizing the district to levy a tax at a rate of $25 per $100,000 of assessed value to repay the bonds. |
A "yes" vote supported enacting taxes on marijuana businesses in the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, including $10 per square foot for cultivation; a 6% tax on gross retail receipts; a 2% tax on testing facilities' gross receipts; a 3% tax on gross distribution receipts; and a 4% tax on the gross reciepts of manufacturing and other marijuana business facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting taxes on marijuana businesses in the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. |
• Los Angeles County, Measure A, Removal of Sheriff for Cause Amendment (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported allowing the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, by a four-fifths vote, to remove the sheriff from office for cause, which is defined to include: violation of laws related to the sheriff's duties; repeated neglect of the sheriff's duties; misuse of public funds or properties; willful falsification of documents; or obstruction of an investigation into the department's conduct. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, by a four-fifths vote, to remove the sheriff from office for cause. |
• Lynwood, California, Proposition TR, Marijuana Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to levy a tax of at least 5% or up to 10% on businesses selling marijuana products and dedicating funds to the city's general fund. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to levy a tax of at least 5% or up to 10% on businesses selling marijuana products and dedicating funds to the city's general fund. |
• Malibu, California, Proposition MC, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to levy a 0.5% sales tax with revenue allocated to the general fund increasing the total combined sales tax in Malibu to 10%. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to levy a 0.5% sales tax with revenue allocated to the general fund, thereby maintaining the existing sales tax rate of 9.5%. |
• Manhattan Beach, California, Measure MB, Repeal Commercial Marijuana Ban Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported repealing the city's prohibition on commercial cannabis, allowing up to three retail locations within the city. |
A "no" vote opposed repealing the city's prohibition on commercial cannabis, allowing up to three retail locations within the city. |
A "yes" vote supported maintaining the commercial cannabis prohibition and allowing limited indoor cultivation of marijuana within the city. |
A "no" vote opposed maintaining the commercial cannabis prohibition and allowing limited indoor cultivation of marijuana within the city. |
• Monrovia Unified School District, California, Measure MM, School Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Monrovia Unified School District to issue $75 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 dollars per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Monrovia Unified School District to issue $75 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 dollars per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Monterey Park, California, Measure MP, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Monterey Park City to increase the sales tax rate from 9.5% to 10.25%, with revenue going to general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Monterey Park City to increase the sales tax rate from 9.5% to 10.25%, with revenue going to general city services. |
• Palmdale School District, California, Measure PRM, School Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Palmdale School District to authorize $120 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Palmdale School District to authorize $120 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Paramount Unified School District, California, Measure P, Term Limit Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported limiting Paramount USD Board of Education members to three terms of four years. |
A "no" vote opposed limiting Paramount USD Board of Education members to three terms of four years. |
• Pasadena, California, Measure H, Charter Amendment For Rent Control Initiative (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported changing Pasadena City's Charter to create a board to limit rent increases to 75% of the Consumer Price Index annually and limit evictions to those that fall under just cause. |
A "no" vote opposed changing Pasadena City's Charter to create a board to limit rent increases to 75% of the Consumer Price Index annually and limit evictions to those that fall under just cause. |
• Pasadena, California, Measure L, Renew Parcel Tax for Library Funding Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing a parcel tax of $41 on single-family residences and condominium units for 15 years to provide library funding. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing a parcel tax of $41 on single-family residences and condominium units for 15 years to provide library funding. |
• Pasadena Area Community College, California, Measure PCC, School Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Pasadena Area Community College to issue $565 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $20 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Pasadena Area Community College to issue $565 million dollars in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $20 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Pico Rivera, California, Measure AB, Business License Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supports authorizing Pico Rivera to update the business tax code to charge businesses that gross less than $25,000 in revenue annually $25 for a business license, and those that gross more than $25,000 annually a bracketed amount depending on their category, with funds going to general city services |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing Pico Rivera to update the business tax code to charge businesses that gross less than $25,000 in revenue annually $25 for a business license, and those that gross more than $25,000 annually a bracketed amount depending on their category, with funds going to general city services |
• Pico Rivera, California, Measure F, City Council Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting term limits for city council members of three consecutive 4-year terms and allowing council members to run again after a 4-year period. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting term limits for city council members of three consecutive 4-year terms. |
• Pomona, California, Measure PC, City Charter Amendment for Campaign Finance Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to amend the local charter to change conflict of interest and campaign finance laws, resulting in some campaign contribution limits and mandated disclosures of campaign finances. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to amend the local charter to change conflict of interest and campaign finance laws, resulting in some campaign contribution limits and mandated disclosures of campaign finances. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to create an ethics commission, which would be responsible for monitoring, reviewing, and advising on state and local ethics law. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to create an ethics commission, which would be responsible for monitoring, reviewing, and advising on state and local law ethics. |
• Pomona, California, Measure PG, City Charter Amendment Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to change the local charter to add a preamble, increase the notice for public meetings, and change rules for filing vacancies for mayoral or council positions. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to change the local charter to add a preamble, increase the notice for public meetings, and change rules for filing vacancies for mayoral or council positions. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to create a redistricting commission to determine city council electoral districts every 10 years. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to create a redistricting commission to determine city council electoral districts every 10 years. |
• Pomona, California, Measure PL, City Charter Amendment for Local Primary Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to change the local charter to establish a local primary to elect mayor and council members, beginning in 2024 and requiring to a runoff election if no majority is secured, with election dates coinciding with statewide primary and general elections. |
A "no" votes opposed authorizing the city to change the local charter to establish a local primary to elect mayor and council members, beginning in 2024 and defaulting to a runoff election if no majority is secured, with election dates coinciding with statewide primary and general elections. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to create a police oversight commission that would receive complaints given to the police department and give policy suggestions to the city. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to create a police oversight commission that would receive complaints given to the police department and give policy suggestions to the city. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to amend the city charter to require a city council member to resign if running for mayor and the mayoral term would start before city council seat term ends. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to amend the city charter to require a city council member to resign if running for mayor and the mayoral term would start before city council seat term ends. |
• Pomona, California, Measure PS, Industrial Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Pomona City to enact a special parcel tax on industrial parcels at a rate of $0.15 per gross square foot, with revenue dedicated to public street renovation. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Pomona City to enact a special parcel tax on industrial parcels at a rate of $0.15 per gross square foot, with revenue dedicated to public street renovation. |
• Pomona, California, Measure PT, City Charter Amendment for Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to enact term limits for the mayor and city council of three consecutive 4-year terms. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to enact term limits for the mayor and city council of three consecutive 4-year terms. |
• San Marino, California, Measure Z, Parcel Tax for Public Safety Funding Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supports levying a special $10,000 parcel tax on specified vacant commercial and residential properties within the city to fund public safety services. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a special $10,000 parcel tax on specified vacant commercial and residential properties within the city to fund public safety services. |
• Santa Monica, California, Measure CS, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Santa Monica City to increase the existing hotel tax from 14% by 1% for hotels and 3% for home-shares, with revenue going to fund general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Santa Monica City to increase the existing hotel tax from 14% by 1% for hotels and 3% for home-shares, with revenue going to fund general city services. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to enact a third tier of property transfer tax on sales greater than $8 million of $2,500 per $100,000 (for a total of $3,100 per $100,000), beginning March 1, 2023, and expiring February 28, 2033, subject to a five-year extension given a supermajority vote by the city council. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to enact a third tier of property transfer tax on sales greater than $8 million of $2,500 per $100,000 (for a total of $3,100 per $100,000), beginning March 1, 2023, and expiring February 28, 2033, subject to a five-year extension given a supermajority vote by the city council. |
• Santa Monica, California, Measure DTS, Transfer Tax Advisory Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported advising the city to spend 30% of additional revenue provided by the Comprehensive Real Property Transfer Tax Measure (Measure DT), if it is passed on housing assistance, homelessness and behavioral health services, public safety, public schools, and public libraries. |
A "no" vote opposed advising the city to spend 30% of additional revenue provided by the Comprehensive Real Property Transfer Tax Measure (Measure DT) if it is passed on housing assistance, homelessness and behavioral health services, public safety, public schools, and public libraries. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to authorize the rent control board to disallow or modify annual rent adjustments during a state of emergency declared by the president, governor, Los Angeles Public Health Officer, or city council. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to authorize the rent control board to disallow or modify annual rent adjustments during a state of emergency declared by the president, governor, Los Angeles Public Health Officer, or city council. |
A "yes" vote supports authorizing the city to enact a third tier (in addition to the previous two tiers) of real estate transfer tax of $5,600 per $100,000, with revenue going to fund homelessness prevention, housing projects, and schools. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing the city to enact a third tier (in addition to the previous two tiers) of real estate transfer tax of $5,600 per $100,000, with revenue going to fund homelessness prevention, housing projects, and schools. |
• Santa Monica, California, Measure HMP, Cannabis Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 3% tax on non-medicinal cannabis retailers, 2% on medicinal cannabis retailers, and 1% on other licensed cannabis businesses, with a maximum of 10% gross tax at the discretion of the city council. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 3% tax on non-medicinal cannabis retailers, 2% on medicinal cannabis retailers, and 1% on other licensed cannabis businesses, with a maximum of 10% gross tax at the discretion of the city council. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to amend the local charter to allow the city personnel board to include those who are Los Angeles county residents but work in Santa Monica, while also reducing terms from five years to four years for personnel board members. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to amend the local charter to allow the city personnel board to include those who are Los Angeles residents citizens but work in Santa Monica, while also reducing terms from five years to four years for personnel board members. |
• Santa Monica, California, Measure RC, Rental Control Law Amendment Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to require land owners to intend occupancy for at least two years and move in within 60 days of vacancy (currently 1 year and 30 days) in order to evict a tenant, and also reduces the rent increase cap to 3% of the Consumer Price Index or $70 per month (currently 6% of the CPI or $140 per month). |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to require land owners to intend occupancy for at least two years and move in within 60 days of vacancy (currently 1 year and 30 days) in order to evict a tenant, and also reduces the rent increase cap to 3% of the Consumer Price Index or $70 per month (currently 6% of the CPI or $140 per month). |
• Santa Monica Community College District, California, Measure SMC, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $375.0 million in bonds and levying a tax of $25 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $375.0 million in bonds and levying a tax of $25 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
• Sierra Madre, California, Measure HR, Mater Dolorosa Property Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported changing the land use designation of the Mater Dolorosa Property from 'Institutional' to 'Hillside Management.' |
A "no" vote opposed changing the land use designation of the Mater Dolorosa Property from 'Institutional' to 'Hillside Management.' |
• South El Monte, California, Measure CM, Marijuana Regulation and Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported allowing up to three marijuana retail businesses, establishing an 8% general tax on noncultivation cannabis business proceeds and $25 per square foot of cultivation space, and providing tax revenue for general services. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing up to three marijuana retail businesses, establishing an 8% general tax on noncultivation cannabis business proceeds and $25 per square foot of cultivation space, and providing tax revenue for general services. |
• South El Monte, California, Measure X, Marijuana Regulation and Tax Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported allowing marijuana businesses (5 dispensaries, 2 cultivation facilities, and others), establishing an 6% tax on retail sales, and providing tax revenue for specific programs. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing marijuana businesses (5 dispensaries, 2 cultivation facilities, and others), establishing an 6% tax on retail sales, and providing tax revenue for specific programs. |
• South Gate, California, Measure PD, Business License Tax Increase Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported increasing the annual tax and solid waste processing fees paid by material recovery facilities to $500 plus $1.94 per ton and providing for increases to other business license taxes every three years based on Consumer Price Index increases. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the annual tax and solid waste processing fees paid by material recovery facilities to $500 plus $1.94 per ton and providing for increases to other business license taxes every three years based on Consumer Price Index increases. |
• South Pasadena, California, Measure LL, Parcel Tax Renewal for Library Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported renewing the percel tax to provide funding for the South Pasadena Public Library to remain in effect until terminated by voters. |
A "no" vote opposed renewing the percel tax to provide funding for the South Pasadena Public Library to remain in effect until terminated by voters. |
• Wiseburn Unified School District, California, Measure EE, School Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $98.0 million in bonds and levying a tax of $30.00 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $98.0 million in bonds and levying a tax of $30.00 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
Madera County
• Madera County, California, Measure T, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported renewing Madera County's 0.5% sales tax to provide funding for streets, highways, and bridges. |
A "no" vote opposed renewing Madera County's 0.5% sales tax to provide funding for streets, highways, and bridges. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the West Hills Community College District to issue $25.1 million in bonds to improve school facilities, and levy a property tax of $24.95 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the West Hills Community College District to issue $25.1 million in bonds to improve school facilities, and levy a property tax of $24.95 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
Marin County
- See also: Marin County, California ballot measures
• Belvedere, California, Measure D, Charter City and Real Estate Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported establishing Belvedere as a charter city and authorizing a real estate property transfer tax of $8 per $1,000 paid to the buyer or seller. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing Belvedere as a charter city and authorizing a real estate property transfer tax of $8 per $1,000 paid to the buyer or seller. |
A “yes” vote supported renewing the special tax of $78 per residence and per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for 2023-2024 and increasing the rate by $3 per year up for four years to provide funding for emergency response services. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing the special tax of $78 per residence and per 1,000 square feet of floor area for nonresidential uses for 2023-2024 and increasing the rate by $3 per year up for four years to provide funding for emergency response services. |
• Fairfax, California, Measure F, Emergency Response Services Property Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the increase of the property tax to $94.50 per residence and 1,500 square feet of non-residential floor area for 2023-2024, increased by $3 per year for four years, to fund emergency response services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the increase of the property tax to $94.50 per residence and 1,500 square feet of non-residential floor area for 2023-2024, increased by $3 per year for four years, to fund emergency response services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.20 per square foot of each structure on improved parcels and $150 per parcel for vacant parcels for fire protection measures. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.20 per square foot of each structure on improved parcels and $150 per parcel for vacant parcels for fire protection measures. |
A “yes” vote supported adjusting the appropriation limit for the Inverness Public Utility District to be in accordance with Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. |
A “no” vote opposed adjusting the appropriation limit for the Inverness Public Utility District to be in accordance with Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. |
• Larkspur, California, Measure G, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing a sales tax of $0.0025. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing a sales tax of $0.0025. |
• Marin County, California, Measure B, Library Funding Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing an annual parcel tax of $98 for 9 years to fund library services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing an annual parcel tax of $98 for 9 years to fund library services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Marin County Open Space District Community Facilities District No. 2022-1 to issue $23,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to acquire the “Martha Property” on the Tiburon Peninsula and requiring a tax levy of $335 increasing 2% annually. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Marin County Open Space District Community Facilities District No. 2022-1 to issue $23,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to acquire the “Martha Property” on the Tiburon Peninsula and requiring a tax levy of $335 increasing 2% annually. |
A “yes” vote supported renewing an annual parcel tax of $1550 per parcel for education purposes for ten years. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing an annual parcel tax of $1550 per parcel for education purposes for ten years. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing a special tax of $94.50 per residential living unit or 1,500 square feet of developed nonresidential property to provide emergency response services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing a special tax of $94.50 per residential living unit or 1,500 square feet of developed nonresidential property to provide emergency response services. |
• San Anselmo, California, Measure H, Library Services Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing an annual parcel tax of $70 per parcel for 9 years for library services. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing an annual parcel tax of $70 per parcel for 9 years for library services. |
• San Anselmo, California, Measure J, General Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing a sales tax at a rate of $0.005 for nine years and then increasing the tax to a rate of $0.01. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing a sales tax at a rate of $0.005 for nine years and then increasing the tax to a rate of $0.01. |
• Sausalito, California, Measure K, Marijuana Sales Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported repealing the ban on marijuana sales in Sausalito, establishing a process for applying to operate a marijuana business, and requiring that the greater of 7.5% net profits or $50,000 from marijuana sales be paid to the city. |
A “no” vote opposed repealing the ban on marijuana sales in Sausalito, establishing a process for applying to operate a marijuana business, and requiring that the greater of 7.5% net profits or $50,000 from marijuana sales be paid to the city. |
• Sausalito, California, Measure L, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported raising the sales tax to 1% for ten years with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed raising the sales tax to 1% for ten years with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “yes” vote supported establishing the appropriations limit for the Stinson Beach County Water District at $2,478,750 for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and using this amount to set future appropriations limits. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing the appropriations limit for the Stinson Beach County Water District at $2,478,750 for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and using this amount to set future appropriations limits. |
Mendocino County
• Hopland Fire Protection District, California, Measure N, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported replacing the existing district tax with a new parcel tax of $85 per parcel plus $85 per residential units and $85 per parcel plus $0.10 per square foot for commercial buildings. |
A "no" vote opposed replacing the existing district tax with a new parcel tax of $85 per parcel plus $85 per residential units and $85 per parcel plus $0.10 per square foot for commercial buildings. |
• Mendocino County, California, Measure O, Sales Tax for Library Services Initiative (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the county's sales tax by 0.25% to provide funding for library services and library building improvements in Mendocino County. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the county's sales tax by 0.25% to provide funding for library services and library building improvements in Mendocino County. |
• Mendocino County, California, Measure P, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the county's sales tax by 0.25% for 10 years to provide funding for city services. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the county's sales tax by 0.25% for 10 years to provide funding for city services. |
Merced County
• Atwater, California, Measure B, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported renewing the city's 1% sales tax to provide funding for public safety services. |
A "no" vote opposed renewing the city's 1% sales tax to provide funding for public safety services. |
• Planada Elementary School District, California, Measure A, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $3.1 million in bonds and levying an estimated tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $3.1 million in bonds and levying an estimated tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
• Westside Community Healthcare District, California, Measure D, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported enacting a tax of $69 per parcel to provide funding for the district. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a tax of $69 per parcel to provide funding for the district. |
Mono County
- See also: Mono County, California ballot measures
• Antelope Fire Protection District, California, Measure H, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported levying a tax of $120 per parcel for structural and wildfire-related supplies, staffing, training, and equipment. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a tax of $120 per parcel for structural and wildfire-related supplies, staffing, training, and equipment. |
Monterey County
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to issue $39,200,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of less than $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to issue $39,200,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of less than $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported establishing a Board of Directors, elected by voters, to govern the East Garrison Community Services District. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing a Board of Directors, elected by voters, to govern the East Garrison Community Services District. |
• Gonzales, California, Measure P, Temporary Transactions and Use Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported renewing the Temporary Transactions and Use Tax of 1% for 20 years, from 2044 to 2064, with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing the Temporary Transactions and Use Tax of 1% for 20 years, from 2044 to 2064, with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• King City, California, Measure I, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported increasing the sales tax rate from 1% to 1.5% for 10 years with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the sales tax rate from 1% to 1.5% for 10 years with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• Monterey, California, Measure J, Marijuana Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported establishing an 8% gross receipts tax on retail marijuana businesses, a 2% gross receipts tax on testing laboratories, a 6% gross receipts from other marijuana businesses, and an additional tax on highly potent products. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing an 8% gross receipts tax on retail marijuana businesses, a 2% gross receipts tax on testing laboratories, a 6% gross receipts from other marijuana businesses, and an additional tax on highly potent products. |
• Monterey County, California, Measure Q, Childcare Parcel Tax Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $49 per parcel for 10 years for childcare services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $49 per parcel for 10 years for childcare services. |
• Pacific Grove, California, Measure M, Marijuana Sales Advisory Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported allowing the City Council to amend the Municipal Code to allow one location for the sale of marijuana, located at least 1000 feet from any licensed daycare, preschool, youth center, or school. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing the City Council to amend the Municipal Code to allow one location for the sale of marijuana, located at least 1000 feet from any licensed daycare, preschool, youth center, or school. |
• Pacific Grove, California, Measure N, Marijuana Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing a gross receipts tax for marijuana businesses of 6% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing a gross receipts tax for marijuana businesses of 6% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• Pacific Grove, California, Measure O, City Councilmembers Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported establishing that two city Councilmembers shall be elected every two years to serve four-year terms and establish that in 2024 two Councilmembers be elected for four-year terms and one Councilmember be elected for a two-year term. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing that two city Councilmembers shall be elected every two years to serve four-year terms and establish that in 2024 two Councilmembers be elected for four-year terms and one Councilmember be elected for a two-year term. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Salinas City Elementary School District to issue $74,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Salinas City Elementary School District to issue $74,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Salinas City Elementary School District to issue $75,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school modernization and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Salinas City Elementary School District to issue $75,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school modernization and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Sand City, California, Measure L, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing the sales tax rate from 1% to 1.5% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the sales tax rate from 1% to 1.5% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Santa Rita Union Elementary School District to issue $24,900,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Santa Rita Union Elementary School District to issue $24,900,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Washington Union School District to issue $13,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $18 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Washington Union School District to issue $13,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $18 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
Napa County
- See also: Napa County, California ballot measures
• American Canyon, California, Measure J, Urban Limit Line Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported adding 157 acres owned by Green Island Property, LLC, to the Urban Limit Line of American Canyon, and to expand potential city industrial development. |
A "no" vote opposed adding 157 acres owned by Green Island Property, LLC, to the Urban Limit Line of American Canyon. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Calistoga Joint Unified School District to issue $41 million in bonds and levying an annual tax of 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed value to improve educational facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Calistoga Joint Unified School District to issue $41 million in bonds and levying an annual tax of 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed value to improve educational facilities. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $249 million in bonds, leveraging $0.04 per $100 in assessed value, to improve school classrooms and infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $249 million in bonds, leveraging $40 per $100,000 in assessed value, to improve school classrooms and infrastructure. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Napa Valley Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 to issue $200 million in bonds, levying $20 per $100,000 in assessed value, for the purpose of upgrading Napa schools to meet safety and academic standards. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Napa Valley Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 to issue $200 million in bonds. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Napa Valley Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 to issue $25 million in bonds, levying $20 per $100,000 in assessed value, for the purpose of upgrading classrooms and school infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Napa Valley Unified School District School Facilities Improvement District No. 2 to issue $25 million in bonds. |
Nevada County
• Nevada City, California, Measure W, Historic Neighborhoods District Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported establishing a Historic Neighborhoods District. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a Historic Neighborhoods District. |
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 1/2 cent sales tax for the purposes of wildfire prevention. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a 1/2 cent sales tax for the purposes of wildfire prevention. |
A "yes" vote supported increasing the appropriation limit to allow expenditure of the dollars already collected for the purpose of providing fire protection and emergency medical services for 2023 to 2026. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the appropriation limit to allow expenditure of the dollars already collected for the purpose of providing fire protection and emergency medical services for 2023 to 2026. |
Orange County
• Aliso Viejo, California, Measure I, Council Member Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported limiting members of the City Council to two four-year terms, with the ability to serve again as a member after at least two years off the Council. |
A "no" vote opposed limiting members of the City Council to two four-year terms, with the ability to serve again as a member after at least two years off the Council. |
• Anaheim, California, Measure J, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported requiring online and travel companies to collect taxes based on the full rate that guests are charged for accommodations instead of the current flat rate that is taxed, with funds directed to city services. |
A "no" vote opposed requiring online and travel companies to collect taxes based on the full rate that guests are charged for accommodations instead of the current flat rate that is taxed, with funds directed to city services. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Capistrano Unified School District to issue $114,000,000 in bonds and the levying of a tax of $44 per $100,000 on assessed property value for Aliso Viejo residents. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Capistrano Unified School District to issue $114,000,000 in bonds and the levying of a tax of $44 per $100,000 on assessed property value for Aliso Viejo residents. |
• Costa Mesa, California, Measure K, Residential Neighborhood Revitalization Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the City Council to adopt publicly-reviewed land use plans to "revitalize" certain areas of the city, expand affordable housing, and restrict building heights. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the City Council to adopt publicly-reviewed land use plans to "revitalize" certain areas of the city, expand affordable housing, and restrict building heights. |
• Huntington Beach, California, Measure L, Charter Amendment (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported adding a Charter amendment to allow the city to construct restrooms and replace existing infrastructure with its current height and footprint not exceeded by 10%. |
A "no" vote opposed adding a Charter amendment to allow the city to construct restrooms and replace existing infrastructure with its current height and footprint not exceeded by 10%. |
• Huntington Beach, California, Measure M, Charter Amendment (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported amending the city Charter to require city clerks and city treasurers to meet minimum qualifications at the time of filing candidacy; require at least four votes to fill Council vacancies and limit appointees to serve only until the next municipal election; and end the requirement for city attorneys to be graduates from law schools accredited by the American Bar Association. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city Charter to require city clerks and city treasurers to meet minimum qualifications at the time of filing candidacy; require at least four votes to fill Council vacancies and limit appointees to serve only until the next municipal election; and end the requirement for city attorneys to be graduates from law schools accredited by the American Bar Association. |
• Huntington Beach, California, Measure N, Charter Amendment (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported defining the attorney-client relationship between the city attorney and the city, so that all legal matters are controlled by the City Council and managed by the city attorney under City Council direction, and permits the City Council to contract with other attorneys if the city attorney has a conflict of interest. |
A "no" vote opposed defining the attorney-client relationship between the city attorney and the city, so that all legal matters are controlled by the City Council and managed by the city attorney under City Council direction, and permits the City Council to contract with other attorneys if the city attorney has a conflict of interest. |
• Huntington Beach, California, Measure O, Commercial Cannabis Businesses Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a tax upon cannabis businesses to fund general municipal services until it is repealed by voters. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a tax upon cannabis businesses to fund general municipal services until it is repealed by voters. |
• La Palma, California, Measure P, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported raising the hotel tax from 8% to 12% to fund general city services until it is repealed by voters. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the hotel tax from 8% to 12% to fund general city services until it is repealed by voters. |
• Laguna Beach, California, Measure Q, Overlay Zoning District Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported creating an overlay zoning district, establishing special requirements for any major development project, and requiring voter approval for any major development project that does not conform to the special requirements. |
A "no" vote opposed creating an overlay zoning district, establishing special requirements for any major development project, and requiring voter approval for any major development project that does not conform to the special requirements. |
• Laguna Beach, California, Measure R, Hotel Development Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported the establishment of the new requirements for hotel zoning and hotel development in Laguna Beach, and the requirement of voter approval for hotel development projects that do not conform to the requirements. |
A "no" vote opposed the establishment of the new requirements for hotel zoning and hotel development in Laguna Beach, and the requirement of voter approval for hotel development projects that do not conform to the requirements. |
• Laguna Beach, California, Measure S, Hotel Employees Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported establishing an $18 hourly minimum wage for hotel employees, workplace standards for hotel employees, and an authorization for the city to implement the provisions of the ordinance. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing an $18 hourly minimum wage for hotel employees, workplace standards for hotel employees, and an authorization for the city to implement the provisions of the ordinance. |
• Laguna Woods, California, Measure T, Cannabis Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported levying a tax on cannabis businesses to fund general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a tax on cannabis businesses to fund general city services. |
• San Clemente, California, Measure U, Appointive City Clerk Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the office of city clerk to be appointive. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the office of city clerk to be appointive. |
• San Clemente, California, Measure V, Appointive City Treasurer Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the office of city treasurer to be appointive. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the office of city treasurer to be appointive. |
• Santa Ana, California, Measure W, Business License Tax Rates Restructuring Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported restructuring non-cannabis business license tax rates. |
A "no" vote opposed restructuring non-cannabis business license tax rates. |
• Santa Ana, California, Measure X, Charter Amendments Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the Charter to include term limits, adjusted budget requirements, and a change of language within the Charter. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the Charter to include term limits, adjusted budget requirements, and a change of language within the Charter. |
A "yes |
A "no" vote opposed placing a three-term term limit on members of the Board for terms beginning on or after the approval of the measure. |
• Westminster, California, Measure Y, Continuation of Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing the existing 1% sales tax to fund general city services until March 31, 2043. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the existing 1% sales tax to fund general city services until March 31, 2043. |
• Yorba Linda, California, Measure Z, Rezoning Requirements Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported amending zoning requirements regarding the heights of housing units, including those with increased heights to meet state laws. |
A "no" vote opposed amending zoning requirements regarding the heights of housing units, including those with increased heights to meet state laws. |
Placer County
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Auburn Union School District to issue $45,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $28 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Auburn Union School District to issue $45,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $28 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Colfax, California, Measure B, Increase in Transient Occupancy Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing the transient occupancy tax from 8% to 10% with revenue dedicated to general city services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the transient occupancy tax from 8% to 10% with revenue dedicated to general city services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Elverta Joint Elementary School District to issue $4,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Elverta Joint Elementary School District to issue $4,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Rocklin, California, Measure F, Hotel Tax Increase Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing the hotel tax from 8% to 10% to fund general services and including campgrounds in what is taxed under the hotel tax. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the hotel tax from 8% to 10% to fund general services and including campgrounds in what is taxed under the hotel tax. |
• Roseville, California, Measure C, Increase in the Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10% for general city services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10% for general city services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $120,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund middle and high school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $23 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $120,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund middle and high school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $23 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $150,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund elementary school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $37 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $150,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund elementary school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $37 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Western Placer Unified School District to issue $185,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $54 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Western Placer Unified School District to issue $185,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $54 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
Plumas County
• Seneca Healthcare District, California, Measure B, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $42 million in bonds to fund hospital facilities and levying a tax of $80 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $42 million in bonds to fund hospital facilities and levying a tax of $80 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
Riverside County
• Alvord Unified School District, California, Measure J, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the school district to issue $248.0 million in bonds and levying an annual tax of $60 per $100,000 of a property's assessed value while bond debt is outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the school district to issue $248.0 million in bonds and levying an annual tax of $60 per $100,000 of a property's assessed value while bond debt is outstanding. |
• Banning, California, Measure I, Utility Users Tax for Park Funding Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported enacting a utility users tax at a rate of $0.015 for each kilowatt-hour of electricity used by an electric energy service user in Banning. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a utility users tax at a rate of $0.015 for each kilowatt-hour of electricity used by an electric energy service user in Banning. |
• Beaumont Library District, California, Measure M, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the library district to issue $24.0 million in bonds and levying an annual tax of $10 per $100,000 of a property's assessed value while bond debt is outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the library district to issue $24.0 million in bonds and levying an annual tax of $10 per $100,000 of a property's assessed value while bond debt is outstanding. |
• Cathedral City, California, Measure K, Bond and Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 15 cents per building square foot on single-family residential units and authorizing bonds and an appropriation limit of $39 million. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 15 cents per building square foot on single-family residential units and authorizing bonds and an appropriation limit of $39 million. |
• Desert Recreation District, California, Measure L, Building Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to levy an annual tax of 7 cents per square on a single-family residential unit and other rates on other types of land uses. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to levy an annual tax of 7 cents per square on a single-family residential unit and other rates on other types of land uses. |
Sacramento County
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Carmichael Recreation and Park District to issue $31,900,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund parks and recreation and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $19 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Carmichael Recreation and Park District to issue $31,900,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund parks and recreation and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $19 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Elk Grove, California, General Sales Tax Measure, Measure E (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general purposes. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general purposes. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Elverta Joint Elementary School District to issue $4,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Elverta Joint Elementary School District to issue $4,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Galt, California, Measure Q, General Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $316 per parcel for supplemental security. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $316 per parcel for supplemental security. |
• Sacramento, California, Measure L, Funds for Youth Development Programs Amendment (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the Sacramento city charter to allocate 40% of funds generated from marijuana business operations tax towards youth development programs. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the Sacramento city charter to allocate 40% of funds generated from marijuana business operations tax towards youth development programs. |
• Sacramento, California, Measure M, Use of Redistricting Maps Charter Amendment (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the Sacramento city charter to establish that new redistricting maps shall take effect at the next-upcoming regular councilmember election. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the Sacramento city charter to establish that new redistricting maps shall take effect at the next-upcoming regular councilmember election. |
• Sacramento, California, Measure N, Hotel Tax Usage for Tourism Projects Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported allowing funds from the city's hotel tax to be used for tourism-related economic development projects. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing funds from the city's hotel tax to be used for tourism-related economic development projects. |
• Sacramento, California, Measure O, Homeless Persons Shelter and Encampment Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported requiring the city of Sacramento to provide shelter beds based on 60% of its homeless population and making it a criminal offense to camp in public and certain private areas if the person refuses the emergency shelter. |
A "no" vote opposed requiring the city of Sacramento to provide shelter beds based on 60% of its homeless population and making it a criminal offense to camp in public and certain private areas if the person refuses the emergency shelter. |
A “yes” vote supported approving the Sacramento County Transportation, Maintenance, Safety and Congestion Relief Act of 2022 - Retail Transactions and Use Tax Initiative, including a 0.5% sales tax, to improve roads and air quality. |
A “no” vote opposed approving the Sacramento County Transportation, Maintenance, Safety and Congestion Relief Act of 2022 - Retail Transactions and Use Tax Initiative, including a 0.5% sales tax, to improve roads and air quality. |
A “yes” vote supported establishing special taxes on gross receipts from marijuana and hemp businesses to fund homeless services. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing special taxes on gross receipts from marijuana and hemp businesses to fund homeless services. |
• Sacramento County, California, Measure D, Low-Income Housing Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported allowing the county of Sacramento and cities within the county to develop housing for low-income people and families equal to 1% of current housing units in the county. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing the county of Sacramento and cities within the county to develop housing for low-income people and families equal to 1% of current housing units in the county. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $120,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund middle and high school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $23 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $120,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund middle and high school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $23 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $150,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund elementary school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $37 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Twin Rivers Unified School District to issue $150,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund elementary school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $37 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
San Benito County
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to issue $39,200,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of less than $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Coalinga Huron Joint Unified School District to issue $39,200,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of less than $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Hollister, California, Measure S, City Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing an eight consecutive year term limit for mayor and a two consecutive four-year term limit for city councilmembers. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing an eight consecutive year term limit for mayor and a two consecutive four-year term limit for city councilmembers. |
A "yes" vote supported advising the city government to re-establish the annual Hollister Motorcycle Rally over the 4th of July weekend. |
A "no" vote opposed advising the city government to re-establish the annual Hollister Motorcycle Rally over the 4th of July weekend. |
A "yes" vote supported advising the city government to re-establish the annual Hollister Motorcycle Rally over a week prior to or following the 4th of July weekend. |
A "no" vote opposed advising the city government to re-establish the annual Hollister Motorcycle Rally over a week prior to or following the 4th of July weekend. |
• San Benito County, California, Measure P, County Board Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a lifetime term limit of three terms for persons serving as county board members beginning after January 1, 2023. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a lifetime term limit of three terms for persons serving as county board members beginning after January 1, 2023. |
A "yes" vote supported removing the commercial thoroughfare and commercial regional node land use designations from the General Plan and requiring a public vote for future amendments redesignating agriculture, rangeland, or rural land use designations for other uses. |
A "no" vote opposed removing the commercial thoroughfare and commercial regional node land use designations from the General Plan and requiring a public vote for future amendments redesignating agriculture, rangeland, or rural land use designations for other uses. |
• San Benito County, California, Measure R, TriCal Property Buffer Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 3.5-mile radius buffer around the TriCal Property on Highway 25 and prohibiting certain land uses within the buffer. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a 3.5-mile radius buffer around the TriCal Property on Highway 25 and prohibiting certain land uses within the buffer. |
• San Juan Bautista, California, Measure V, Appointed City Treasurer Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported changing the city treasurer from an elected to an appointed position. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the city treasurer from an elected to an appointed position. |
• San Juan Bautista, California, Measure W, Appointed City Clerk Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported changing the city clerk from an elected to an appointed position. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the city clerk from an elected to an appointed position. |
San Bernardino County
• Barstow, California, Measure H, Mayor Selection Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported changing the process for selecting a mayor to one where the mayor is selected from the five city council members and serves in both positions. |
A “no” vote opposed changing the process for selecting a mayor to one where the mayor is selected from the five city council members and serves in both positions. |
• Big Bear Lake, California, Measure O, Vacation Rental Regulations Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported amending the Big Bear Lake Municipal Code in regard to vacation rentals in private residences. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the Big Bear Lake Municipal Code in regard to vacation rentals in private residences. |
• Big Bear Lake, California, Measure P, Hotel Tax Rate Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing the hotel tax from 8% to 9% on January 1, 2024, and then from 9% to 10% on January 1, 2025, with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the hotel tax from 8% to 9% on January 1, 2024, and then from 9% to 10% on January 1, 2025, with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• Colton, California, Measure S, General Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing a sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing a sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• Grand Terrace, California, Measure M, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax of up to 10%. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax of up to 10%. |
A “yes” vote supported adopting a measure to tax marijuana retail, delivery, cultivation, and manufacturing/testing businesses at a rate of not more than 7% of gross receipts for general city services. |
A “no” vote opposed adopting a measure to tax marijuana retail, delivery, cultivation, and manufacturing/testing businesses at a rate of not more than 7% of gross receipts for general city services. |
• Montclair, California, Measure R, Marijuana Gross Receipts Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing a marijuana gross receipts tax of no more than 7% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing a marijuana gross receipts tax of no more than 7% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• Needles, California, Measure N, Hotel Tax Change Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the hotel tax to include short-term residential rental units. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the hotel tax to include short-term residential rental units. |
• Ontario, California, Measure Q, Sales Tax Establishment Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• Redlands, California, Measure F, Socio-Economic Analyses and Land Usage Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported making changes to the process for conducting the socio-economic impact analysis for residential projects, exempting the "Transit Village Overlay Zone" from the prohibition against the establishment of new residential land use classifications, and creating height limits on buildings in certain areas. |
A “no” vote opposed making changes to the process for conducting the socio-economic impact analysis for residential projects, exempting the "Transit Village Overlay Zone" from the prohibition against the establishment of new residential land use classifications, and creating height limits on buildings in certain areas. |
• Redlands, California, Measure J, Business License Tax Rate Change Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing the business license tax from a rate of $0.047 per gross square foot to a rate of $0.105 per gross square foot with revenue dedicated to city services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the business license tax from a rate of $0.047 per gross square foot to a rate of $0.105 per gross square foot with revenue dedicated to city services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Rialto Unified School District to issue $340,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Rialto Unified School District to issue $340,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• San Bernardino County, California, Measure D, County Charter Amendment (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the county charter to make changes to the tax implementation process, term limits for county supervisors, and salaries for county board members. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the county charter to make changes to the tax implementation process, term limits for county supervisors, and salaries for county board members. |
A “yes” vote supported having the elected representatives for San Bernardino research and advocate for all methods (including secession from the state) for receiving an equitable share of state funding and resources. |
A “no” vote opposed having the elected representatives for San Bernardino research and advocate for all methods (including secession from the state) for receiving an equitable share of state funding and resources. |
• Upland, California, Measure L, General Services Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
• Yucca Valley, California, Measure K, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported increasing the hotel tax to a rate of 12% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the hotel tax to a rate of 12% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
San Diego County
• Carlsbad, California, Measure J, Monroe Street Pool Renovation/Replacement Project (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported approving an amount to exceed $1 million in existing city funds for the Monroe Street Pool Renovation/Replacement Project, increasing the cost range from $22 million to $24 million. |
A "no" vote opposed approving an amount to exceed $1 million in existing city funds for the Monroe Street Pool Renovation/Replacement Project, increasing the cost range from $22 million to $24 million. |
• Chula Vista, California, Measure K, City Charter Modification Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported modifying the City Charter to eliminate or clarify outdated and ambiguous language, reformat for usability, require residency and increased experienced for elected City Attorney, remove the requirement that most board and commission members must be qualified electors, use mail ballot to fill vacancy, approve bonded debt under state laws, allow City Council to take action at special Council meetings, and conform with State laws. |
A "no" vote opposed modifying the City Charter to eliminate or clarify outdated and ambiguous language, reformat for usability, require residency and increased experienced for elected City Attorney, remove the requirement that most board and commission members must be qualified electors, use mail ballot to fill vacancy, approve bonded debt under state laws, allow City Council to take action at special Council meetings, and conform with State laws. |
• El Cajon, California, Measure P, One Cent Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported repealing the $0.005 sales tax and establishing a $0.01 sales tax to fund general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a $0.01 sales tax to fund general city services, keeping the $0.005 sales tax. |
• Encinitas, California, Measure L, Cannabis Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a cannabis sales tax at rates of 4% to 7% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, 1% to 4% for non-retail cannabis businesses, and $2.00 to $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a cannabis sales tax at rates of 4% to 7% of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses, 1% to 4% for non-retail cannabis businesses, and $2.00 to $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation. |
• Escondido, California, Measure E, 3/4 Cent Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 3/4 cent sales tax for 15 years for general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a 3/4 cent sales tax for 15 years for general city services. |
• Escondido, California, Measure F, Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing term limits of two terms for Mayor, three terms for City Councilmember, and three terms for City Treasurer, whether consecutive or not. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing term limits of two terms for Mayor, three terms for City Councilmember, and three terms for City Treasurer, whether consecutive or not. |
A "yes" vote supported reducing the city treasurer compensation to the same level as a city councilmember. |
A "no" vote opposed reducing the city treasurer compensation to the same level as a city councilmember. |
• Imperial Beach, California, Measure R, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the hotel tax by 4%. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the hotel tax by 4%. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing $27 million in bonds, levying below $30 per $100,000 in assessed value, to upgrade and repair infrastructure and classrooms. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing $27 million in bonds, levying below $30 per $100,000 in assessed value, to upgrade and repair infrastructure and classrooms. |
A "yes" votes supported increasing the number of seats on the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District from three to five at large seats. |
A "no" votes opposed increasing the number of seats on the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District from three to five at large seats. |
• National City, California, Measure M, Office of City Clerk Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported providing the Office of City Clerk to be appointive. |
A "no" vote opposed providing the Office of City Clerk to be appointive. |
• National City, California, Measure N, Office of City Treasurer Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported providing the Office of City Treasurer to be appointive. |
A "no" vote opposed providing the Office of City Treasurer to be appointive. |
• San Diego, California, Measure B, Waste Management Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported allowing the city to recover costs for solid waste management services. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing the city to recover costs for solid waste management services. |
A "yes" vote supported excluding the Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan area from the 30-foot height limit on buildings. |
A "no" vote opposed excluding the Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan area from the 30-foot height limit on buildings. |
• San Diego, California, Measure D, Project Labor Agreements Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the San Diego Municipal code to allow the use of Project Labor Agreements on City Construction Projects, prohibit employment discrimination, expand public disclosure, track local hiring requirements, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Board. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the San Diego Municipal code to allow the use of Project Labor Agreements on City Construction Projects, prohibit employment discrimination, expand public disclosure, track local hiring requirements, and establish a Citizens' Oversight Board. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing childcare on dedicated parkland property. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing childcare on dedicated parkland property. |
• San Diego County, California, Measure A, Cannabis Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a cannabis sales tax at 6% for retail, 3% for distribution, 2% for testing, cultivation at 3% or $10 (inflation adjustable) per canopy square foot, and 4% for other businesses. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a cannabis sales tax at 6% for retail, 3% for distribution, 2% for testing, cultivation at 3% or $10 (inflation adjustable) per canopy square foot, and 4% for other businesses. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing $3.2 billion in bonds, levying 6 cents per $100 in assessed value, to upgrade and repair infrastructure and classrooms. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing $3.2 billion in bonds, levying 6 cents per $100 in assessed value, to upgrade and repair infrastructure and classrooms. |
• Solana Beach, California, Measure S, One Cent Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a $0.01 sales tax for general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a $0.01 sales tax for general city services. |
San Francisco County
A "yes" vote supported allowing city employees who retired before November 6, 1996, to receive a supplemental cost of living adjustment to their pensions whether or not the retirement system is fully funded and allowing the Retirement Board to enter into an individual employment contract with its executive director. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing city employees who retired before November 6, 1996, to receive a supplemental cost of living adjustment to their pensions whether or not the retirement system is fully funded and allowing the Retirement Board to enter into an individual employment contract with its executive director, thereby requiring the Retirement Board to follow city civil service hiring rules, which limit the Board's salary and benefit offerings. |
A "yes" vote supported eliminating the Department of Sanitation and Streets and transferring its duties to the Department of Public Works and retaining the Public Works Commission and the Sanitation and Streets Commission. |
A "no" vote opposed eliminating the Department of Sanitation and Streets and transferring its duties to the Department of Public Works. |
A "yes" vote supported creating a Homelessness Oversight Commission to oversee the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing and requiring the city controller to conduct audits of services for people experiencing homelessness. |
A "no" vote opposed creating a Homelessness Oversight Commission to oversee the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing and requiring the city controller to conduct audits of services for people experiencing homelessness. |
A "yes" vote supported expediting the approval of certain affordable housing projects and removing the Board of Supervisors' approval as a requirement for affordable housing projects using city property or city financing. |
A "no" vote opposed expediting the approval of certain affordable housing projects and removing the Board of Supervisors' approval as a requirement for affordable housing projects using city property or city financing. |
A "yes" vote supported expediting the approval of certain affordable housing projects and continuing to require the Board of Supervisors' approval for affordable housing projects using city property or city financing. |
A "no" vote opposed expediting the approval of certain affordable housing projects and continuing to require the Board of Supervisors' approval for affordable housing projects using city property or city financing. |
A "yes" vote supported the following:
|
A "no" vote opposed the following:
|
A "yes" vote supported creating the Student Success Fund to provide additional grants to San Francisco Unified School District through 2038, with the city allocating $11 million to the Fund in 2024, $35 million in 2025, and $45 million in 2026. |
A "no" vote opposed creating the Student Success Fund to provide additional grants to San Francisco Unified School District. |
A "yes" vote supported changing elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, and Treasurer from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years (in November of presidential election years) and changing signature requirements for ballot initiatives from 5% of votes cast for mayor to 2% of registered voters. |
A "no" vote opposed the proposed changes, thereby continuing to hold elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, and Treasurer during odd-numbered years and maintaining that the basis for determining the number of signatures required for ballot initiatives shall be 5% of votes cast for mayor in the previous mayoral election. |
A "yes" vote supported allowing private motor vehicles on John F. Kennedy Drive and connector streets, known as the JFK Promenade, except from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sundays and legal holidays as well as on Saturdays from April through September. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing private motor vehicles on John F. Kennedy Drive and connector streets, known as the JFK Promenade, except from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sundays and legal holidays as well as on Saturdays from April through September, thereby maintaining current law providing for the closure of these roads to use the area as recreational open space. |
A "yes" vote supported upholding an ordinance adopted in May 2022 that provided for the closure of portions of John F. Kennedy Drive and certain connector streets in Golden Gate Park, known as JFK Promenade, to use the area as open recreation spaces. |
A "no" vote opposed upholding an ordinance adopted in May 2022 that provided for the closure of portions of John F. Kennedy Drive and certain connector streets in Golden Gate Park, known as JFK Promenade, to use the area as open recreation spaces |
A "yes" vote supported continuing an existing one-half cent sales tax through 2053 for transportation project funding and allowing the Transportation Authority to issue up to $1.91 billion in bonds for transportation projects. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing an existing one-half cent sales tax through 2053 for transportation project funding and allowing the Transportation Authority to issue up to $1.91 billion in bonds for transportation projects. |
A "yes" vote supported allowing the city to levy a tax on owners of vacant residential units in buildings with three or more units if the units have been vacant for more than 182 days in a year, at a rate between $2,500–5,000 per vacant unit in 2024 with adjustments for inflation in future years, continuing through 2053, and dedicating tax revenue for rent subsidies and affordable housing. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing the city to levy a tax on owners of vacant residential units in buildings with three or more units if the units have been vacant for more than 182 days in a year, at a rate between $2,500–5,000 per vacant unit in 2024 with adjustments for inflation in future years, continuing through 2053, and dedicating tax revenue for rent subsidies and affordable housing. |
A "yes" vote supported allowing the city to use public funds to acquire, operate, or subsidize public parking in the underground parking garage in Golden Gate Park; dissolves the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority and transfers management of the garage to the Recreation and Park Commission. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing the city to use public funds to acquire, operate, or subsidize public parking in the underground parking garage in Golden Gate Park; dissolves the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority and transfers management of the garage to the Recreation and Park Commission. |
A "yes" vote supported levying a parcel tax at varying rates between $150–4,000 per parcel, beginning on July 1, 2023 and ending on June 30, 2043, with funding appropriated to the City College of San Francisco for student and workforce development programs. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a parcel tax at varying rates between $150–4,000 per parcel, beginning on July 1, 2023 and ending on June 30, 2043, with funding appropriated to the City College of San Francisco for student and workforce development programs. |
San Joaquin County
• Stockton Unified School District, California, Measure C, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the school district to issue $215.0 million in bonds with levies for repayment averaging an estimated $50 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the school district to issue $215.0 million in bonds with levies for repayment averaging an estimated $50 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Tracy, California, Measure B, Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported changing the city's business tax to have rates between 0.1% and 0.3% of gross receipts. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the city's business tax to have rates between 0.1% and 0.3% of gross receipts. |
San Luis Obispo County
• Arroyo Grande, California, Measure D-22, 1% Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported adopting a 1% sales tax for general city purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed adopting a 1% sales tax for general city purposes. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $8.5 million in bonds, levying $0.01 per $100 in assessed value, the improve the ambulance station and healthcare facility. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $8.5 million in bonds, levying $0.01 per $100 in assessed value, the improve the ambulance station and healthcare facility. |
• Morro Bay, California, Measure B-22, Harbor Infrastructure Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported issuing an annual $120 special parcel tax to fund Morro City harbor infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing an annual $120 special parcel tax to fund Morro City harbor infrastructure. |
• Paso Robles, California, Measure E-22, City Treasurer Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported establishing that the Office of City Treasurer be appointive. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing that the Office of City Treasurer be appointive. |
• Paso Robles, California, Measure F-22, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the hotel tax from 10% to 11%. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the hotel tax from 10% to 11%. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $349 million in bonds, levying 4.9 cents per $100 in assessed value, for school and classroom repairs, renovations, and security/safety improvements. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $349 million in bonds, levying 4.9 cents per $100 in assessed value, for school and classroom repairs, renovations, and security/safety improvements. |
San Mateo County
A "yes" vote supported renewing the parcel tax of $96 per parcel for eight years, thereby raising approximately $160,000 per year for the Bayshore Elementary School District. |
A "no" vote opposed renewing the parcel tax of $96 per parcel for eight years, thereby allowing the parcel tax to expire. |
• Belmont, California, Measure K, Hotel Tax (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported raising the hotel tax to 14%, with revenue going to general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the hotel tax to 14%, with revenue going to general city services. |
• Brisbane, California, Measure O, Hotel Business License Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a hotel business license tax of $2.50 per room for each day such room is rented, the revenue going towards general municipal purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a hotel business license tax of $2.50 per room for each day such room is rented, the revenue going towards general municipal purposes. |
• Brisbane, California, Measure U, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a $0.005 sales tax to fund city services and facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a $0.005 sales tax to fund city services and facilities. |
• Burlingame, California, Measure X, Business Licensing Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported updating Burlingame's business licensing, with rates ranging from $200 to $750 and 5% of gross receipts for non-storefront marijuana businesses, with revenue funding city services. |
A "no" vote opposed updating Burlingame's business licensing. |
A "yes" vote supported raising the East Palo Alto business tax to 2.5% of gross receipts for all residential units. |
A "no" vote opposed raising the East Palo Alto business tax to 2.5% of gross receipts for all residential units. |
• La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District, California, Measure R, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District to issue $15 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities and infrastructure, levying approximately $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the La Honda-Pescadero Unified School District to issue $15 million in bonds to repair and modernize school facilities and infrastructure, levying approximately $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Menlo Park, California, Measure V, Zoning Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported adopting a measure that prohibits the City Council from re-zoning or re-designating certain properties that were zoned and designated for single family detached homes. |
A "no" vote opposed adopting a measure that prohibits the City Council from re-zoning or re-designating certain properties that were zoned and designated for single family detached homes. |
• Millbrae, California, Measure N, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the existing Millbrae hotel tax from 12% to 14%, with revenue going to general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the existing Millbrae hotel tax from 12% to 14%, with revenue going to general city services. |
• Pacifica, California, Measure Q, Fireworks Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported prohibiting the ignition, use, discharge, or sale of all state-designated Safe and Sane fireworks in Pacifica. |
A "no" vote opposed prohibiting the ignition, use, discharge, or sale of all state-designated Safe and Sane fireworks in Pacifica. |
• Pacifica, California, Measure Y, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a $0.005 sales tax for general government use and to fund city services. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a $0.005 sales tax for general government use and to fund city services. |
• Redwood City, California, Measure P, Mayoral Term Charter Amendment Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported shortening the term of mayor from two years to one year in order to allow more councilmembers to serve as mayor during their tenure on City Council. |
A "no" vote opposed shortening the term of mayor from two years to one year. |
• Redwood City, California, Measure Z, Election Procedures Charter Amendment (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the Redwood City Charter to align the date of the Redwood City General Municipal election with the statewide general election date, clarify the date by which Redwood City elections must be certified and City councilmembers sworn in, and provide for the election of City councilmembers by-district in order to comply with state law. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the Redwood City Charter to align the date of the Redwood City General Municipal election with the statewide general election date, clarify the date by which Redwood City elections must be certified and City councilmembers sworn in, and provide for the election of City councilmembers by-district in order to comply with state law. |
• Redwood City Elementary School District, California, Measure S, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Redwood City Elementary School District to issue $298 million in bonds by repairing and upgrading classrooms and labs, upgrading infrastructure, and making safety/security improvements, levying $24 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Redwood City Elementary School District to issue $298 million in bonds by repairing and upgrading classrooms and labs, upgrading infrastructure, and making safety/security improvements, levying $24 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• San Bruno, California, Measure BB, Mayor and City Council Term Limit Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported limiting service on the City Council or as Mayor to no more than 12 consecutive years. |
A "no" vote opposed limiting service on the City Council or as Mayor to no more than 12 consecutive years. |
A "yes" vote supported increasing San Mateo's existing transfer tax on property sales of $10 million or more from 0.5% to 1.5%, with the revenue used to fund general services. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing San Mateo's existing transfer tax on property sales of $10 million or more from 0.5% to 1.5%, with the revenue used to fund general services. |
• Sequoia Union High School District, California, Measure W, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Sequoia Union High School District to issue $591 million in bonds to repair and upgrade the infrastructure and classrooms of local high schools, levying $14 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Sequoia Union High School District to issue $591 million in bonds to repair and upgrade the infrastructure and classrooms of local high schools, levying $14 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing South San Francisco to develop, construct, and acquire affordable, decent, and safe rental housing for low-income people, in an amount up to 1% of the total number of existing housing units in the South San Francisco for an 8 year period. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing South San Francisco to develop, construct, and acquire affordable, decent, and safe rental housing for low-income people. |
• South San Francisco, Measure DD, Tax Parcel Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $2.50 per square foot of parcel size on commercial office parcels, with revenue going towards funding early learning and childcare of families living and working in the South San Francisco Unified School District. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $2.50 per square foot of parcel size on commercial office parcels. |
• South San Francisco Unified School District, California, Measure T, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the South San Francisco Unified School District to issue $436 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund modernizing classrooms, making safety and security improvements, and constructing local affordable rental housing for teachers and staff, and levying $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the South San Francisco Unified School District to issue $436 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund modernizing classrooms, making safety and security improvements, and constructing local affordable rental housing for teachers and staff, and levying $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
Santa Barbara County
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Buellton Union School District to issue $8,800,000 in bonds [ith bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $26 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Buellton Union School District to issue $8,800,000 in bonds [ith bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $26 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Carpinteria, California, Measure T2022, Parcel Rezoning Initiative (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported amending the city's general plan to redesignate the zoning designation of parcel APN 004-105-011 and parcel 004-105-206 and amending the definition of the open space/recreation land use category. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the city's general plan to redesignate the zoning designation of parcel APN 004-105-011 and parcel 004-105-206 and amending the definition of the open space/recreation land use category. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the College School District to issue $23,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the College School District to issue $23,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements. |
• Goleta, California, Measure B2022, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1%. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1%. |
• Goleta, California, Measure C2022, Prohibition of Flavored Tobacco Sales Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the municipal code to prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the municipal code to prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco. |
• Guadalupe, California, Measure Z2022, Hotel Tax Increase Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported increasing the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10% for general services and adding short-term rentals to those subjected to the tax. |
A “no” vote opposed increasing the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10% for general services and adding short-term rentals to those subjected to the tax. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Guadalupe Elementary School District to issue $8,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Guadalupe Elementary School District to issue $8,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Guadalupe Elementary School District to issue $8,490,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $29.50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Guadalupe Elementary School District to issue $8,490,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $29.50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported renewing an annual parcel tax of $79 per parcel for 5 years for school improvements for the Hope Elementary School District. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing an annual parcel tax of $79 per parcel for 5 years for school improvements for the Hope Elementary School District. |
• Lompoc, California, Measur X2022, Imposition of a Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing a transient occupancy tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to police and fire protection and allowing hotel operators to retain 2% of the collected tax for collection costs. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing a transient occupancy tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to police and fire protection and allowing hotel operators to retain 2% of the collected tax for collection costs. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Lompoc Unified School District to issue up to $125,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Lompoc Unified School District to issue up to $125,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements. |
• Solvang, California, Measure U2022, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to city services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to city services. |
Santa Clara County
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Alum Rock Union School District to issue $71.5 million in bonds to fund general school improvements, and require a property tax of less than $20 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Alum Rock Union School District to issue $71.5 million in bonds to fund general school improvements, and require a property tax of less than $20 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Campbell Union High School District, California, Measure O, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing the current parcel tax of $85 per parcel for 10 years to fund school programs and other school services. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the current parcel tax of $85 per parcel for 10 years to fund school programs and other school services. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Campbell Union School District to issue $96 million in bonds to fund general improvements to school facilities, and requiring a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Campbell Union School District to issue $96 million in bonds to fund general improvements to school facilities, and requiring a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the East Side Union High School District to issue $572 million in bonds to fund school facilities, and requiring a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the East Side Union High School District to issue $572 million in bonds to fund school facilities, and requiring a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Gilroy, California, Measure D, Construction Contract Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the Gilroy Charter to modify the bidding threshold, establish authority to procure for certain contracts, and modernizing public noticing. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the Gilroy Charter to modify the bidding threshold, establish authority to procure for certain contracts, and modernizing public noticing. |
A "yes" vote supported levying a parcel tax of $348 per parcel for 8 years to fund school programs and facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a parcel tax of $348 per parcel for 8 years to fund school programs and facilities. |
• Los Gatos, California, Measure J, Business License Tax Increase Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the Los Gatos 1991 business license tax by increasing flat taxes and retailing gross receipts for general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the Los Gatos 1991 business license tax by increasing flat taxes and retailing gross receipts for general city services. |
• Milpitas, California, Measure F, Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a ten consecutive year limit on combined mayor and councilmember service, a six year limit on mayoral service, and a two year "cooling off" period in which a person is prohibited from the office of both mayor and councilmember. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the Milpitas Municipal Code to establish term limits of a ten consecutive year limit on combined mayor and councilmember service, a six year limit on mayoral service, and a two year "cooling off" period in which a person is prohibited from the office of both mayor and councilmember. |
• Morgan Hill, California, Measure A, Zoning Changes Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported changing zoning regulations to disallow the construction of buildings with characteristics that could be used for new storage and distribution. |
A "no" vote opposed changing zoning regulations to disallow the construction of buildings with characteristics that could be used for new storage and distribution. |
• Morgan Hill, California, Measure B, General Plan Voter Approval Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city's General Plan to require voter approval of any Monterey Road lane reduction. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city's General Plan to require voter approval of any Monterey Road lane reduction. |
• Oak Grove School District, California, Measure P, School Improvements Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Oak Grove School District to issue $236 million in bonds to fund general school improvements, and require a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Oak Grove School District to issue $236 million in bonds to fund general school improvements, and require a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Palo Alto, California, Measure K, Local Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported levying a tax on businesses of 7.5 cents per square foot occupied by a business, with annual adjustments for inflation, to fund general city services for 35 years. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a tax on businesses of 7.5 cents per square foot occupied by a business, with annual adjustments for inflation, to fund general city services for 35 years. |
• Palo Alto, California, Measure L, Natural Gas Utility General Fund Transfer Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing the existing city policy of transferring at most 18% of the city's revenue from the natural gas utility to a general fund for city services. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the existing city policy of transferring at most 18% of the city's revenue from the natural gas utility to a general fund for city services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Patterson Joint Unified School District to issue $74,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $57 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Patterson Joint Unified School District to issue $74,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $57 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• San Jose, California, Measure I, Charter Amendment Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city Charter to include the city's ethics and elections commission, remove requirements for certain commissions, and require the City Council to adopt new values and standards in making certain decisions. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city Charter to include the city's ethics and elections commission, remove requirements for certain commissions, and require the City Council to adopt new values and standards in making certain decisions. |
• Santa Clara, California, Measure G, Renewal of Utility Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported continuing the current practice of the transfer of the revenue generated from the city's 5% utility tax from the utilities budget to a general fund. |
A "no" vote opposed continuing the current practice of the transfer of the revenue generated from the city's 5% utility tax from the utilities budget to a general fund. |
• Santa Clara, California, Measure H, Business License Tax Increase Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing Santa Clara's 1992 business license tax on businesses to $45 per employee and $15 per rental unit on landlords to fund general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing Santa Clara's 1992 business license tax on businesses to $45 per employee and $15 per rental unit on landlords to fund general city services. |
• Saratoga, California, Measure C, Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a term limit for Saratoga City Council Members of two terms. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a term limit for Saratoga City Council Members of two terms. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Union School District to issue $128 million in bonds to fund general school facilities improvements, and requiring a property tax of $20 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Union School District to issue $128 million in bonds to fund general school facilities improvements, and requiring a property tax of $20 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
Santa Cruz County
A "yes" vote supported enacting a tax of $36 per parcel for 30 years to provide funding for certain building projects. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a tax of $36 per parcel for 30 years to provide funding for certain building projects. |
A "yes" vote supported levying a parcel tax of $348 per parcel for 8 years to fund school programs and facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a parcel tax of $348 per parcel for 8 years to fund school programs and facilities. |
• Santa Cruz, California, Measure K, High School District Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing $249 million in bonds for school updates and repairs. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing $249 million in bonds for school updates and repairs. |
• Santa Cruz, California, Measure L, Elementary School District Bond Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing $122 million in bonds for school updates and repairs. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing $122 million in bonds for school updates and repairs. |
• Santa Cruz, California, Measure N, Empty Home Tax Initiative Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported enacting an Empty Home Tax on residences that are in use less than 120 days per calendar year in the amount of $6,000 per single-family residence, $6,000 per parcel with six or fewer units, and $3,000 per year on condominiums and residential units with seven or more units, with revenue allocated toward housing projects. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting an Empty Home Tax on residences that are in use less than 120 days per calendar year in the amount of $6,000 per single-family residence, $6,000 per parcel with six or fewer units, and $3,000 per year on condominiums and residential units with seven or more units, with revenue allocated toward housing projects. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the General Plan and Downtown Plan to: (1) prohibit construction of the proposed Downtown Library and Affordable Housing Project and relocation of the Downtown Farmers Market; (2) require development of affordable housing on certain Downtown City-owned surface parking lots; and (3) designate the use of surplus parking district revenue for Downtown affordable housing development projects, alternative transportation programs for downtown workers and other non-parking related expenditures. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the General Plan and Downtown Plan to: (1) prohibit construction of the proposed Downtown Library and Affordable Housing Project and relocation of the Downtown Farmers Market; (2) require development of affordable housing on certain Downtown City-owned surface parking lots; and (3) designate the use of surplus parking district revenue for Downtown affordable housing development projects, alternative transportation programs for downtown workers and other non-parking related expenditures. |
• Santa Cruz, California, Measure P, Transient Occupancy Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported increasing the hotel tax from 11% to 12% for hotels, motels, and inns, and from 11% to 14% for short-term residential vacation rentals. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the hotel tax from 11% to 12% for hotels, motels, and inns, and from 11% to 14% for short-term residential vacation rentals. |
A "yes" vote supported amending provisions of the Watsonville General Plan as provided in the Watsonville Planned Growth and Farmland Protection Initiative. |
A "no" vote opposed amending provisions of the Watsonville General Plan as provided in the Watsonville Planned Growth and Farmland Protection Initiative. |
• Watsonville, California, Measure R, Community Investment Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a one-half cent sales tax to provide funding for Watsonville’s general services. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a one-half cent sales tax to provide funding for Watsonville’s general services. |
• Watsonville, California, Measure S, Planning for Watsonville's Future Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported maintaining the restrictions on growth approved by the voters in 2002 until 2040, with the exception of any property identified by the City Council during the General Plan update, subject to community input, as being well suited for development that would create local jobs, parks, and safe spaces for kids to play, or housing for working families, seniors, and residents with disabilities. |
A "no" vote opposed maintaining the restrictions on growth approved by the voters in 2002 until 2040, with the exception of any property identified by the City Council during the General Plan update, subject to community input, as being well suited for development that would create local jobs, parks, and safe spaces for kids to play, or housing for working families, seniors, and residents with disabilities. |
Shasta County
• Esparto Unified School District, California, Measure L, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $19.9 million bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value for bond payments. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $19.9 million bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value for bond payments. |
• Woodland, California, Measure J, City Council Salary Increase Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported increasing the salary for Woodland City Council members from $250 to $500 per month. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the salary for Woodland City Council members from $250 to $500 per month. |
• Woodland, California, Measure K, Marijuana Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" |
A "no" |
Siskiyou County
A "yes" vote supported increasing the Mount Shasta Fire Protection District's spending limit to $425,000 for four years. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the Mount Shasta Fire Protection District's spending limit to $425,000 for four years. |
• Yreka, California, Measure Q, Appointed City Treasurer Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported changing the city treasurer from an elected position to an appointed position. |
A "no" vote opposed this measure, thus keeping the city treasurer as an elected position. |
Solano County
• Benicia, California, Measure K, Urban Growth Boundary Extension Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported extending the existing Urban Growth Boundary. |
A "no" vote opposed extending the existing Urban Growth Boundary. |
• Benicia, California, Measure R, 3/4 Cent Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported adopting a 3/4 cent sales tax for general government purposes. |
A "no" vote opposed adopting a 3/4 cent sales tax for general government purposes. |
• Dixon, California, Measure D, One Cent Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported establishing a $0.01 sales tax. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a $0.01 sales tax. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $249 million in bonds, leveraging $0.04 per $100 in assessed value, to improve school classrooms and infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $249 million in bonds, leveraging $40 per $100,000 in assessed value, to improve school classrooms and infrastructure. |
• Solano County, California, Measure E, 1/8% Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 1/8% sales tax to enhance fire protection and reduce wildfire risk. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a 1/8% sales tax to enhance fire protection and reduce wildfire risk. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $64 million in bonds, levying $0.06 per $100 in assessed value, to replace plumping, electrical, heating, air conditioning; updating classrooms; and improving safety and security. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $64 million in bonds, levying $60 per $100,000 in assessed value, to replace plumping, electrical, heating, air conditioning; updating classrooms; and improving safety and security. |
A "yes" vote supported issuing $229.5 million in bonds, levying $0.045 per $100 in assessed value, to improve and renovate classrooms and other school infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $229.5 million in bonds, levying $45 per $100,000 in assessed value, to improve and renovate classrooms and other school infrastructure. |
• Vallejo, California, Measure P, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 0.875% sales tax. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a 0.875% sales tax. |
Sonoma County
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Calistoga Joint Unified School District to issue $41 million in bonds and levying an annual tax of 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed value to improve educational facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Calistoga Joint Unified School District to issue $41 million in bonds and levying an annual tax of 3.5 cents per $100 of assessed value to improve educational facilities. |
• Cloverdale, California, Measure K, Prohibit Fireworks Sale and Use Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported prohibiting the sale and use of all fireworks, including "safe and sane" fireworks, within the City of Cloverdale, with the exception of permitted public firework displays. |
A "no" vote opposed prohibiting the sale and use of all fireworks, including "safe and sane" fireworks, within the City of Cloverdale, with the exception of permitted public firework displays. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Forestville Elementary School district to issue $6.5 million in bonds at legal interest rates, levying $0.02 per $100 in assessed value while bonds are outstanding, to repair school infrastructure, support student programs, and reduce energy costs. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Forestville Elementary School district to issue $6.5 million in bonds at legal interest rates, levying $0.02 per $100 in assessed value while bonds are outstanding, to repair school infrastructure, support student programs, and reduce energy costs. |
• Healdsburg, California, Measure L, Transient Occupancy Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the Transient Occupancy Tax to facilitate improvement and construction of parks, community service facilities, and housing, without altering any other rates or mechanics of the Transient Occupancy Tax. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the Transient Occupancy Tax to facilitate improvement and construction of parks, community service facilities, and housing, without altering any other rates or mechanics of the Transient Occupancy Tax. |
• Healdsburg, California, Measure M, Cannabis Business Tax (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported establishing an 8% tax of gross receipts for cannabis businesses to be spent on unrestricted general revenue purposes, including for police, fire and emergency services, parks, affordable housing, and street maintenance. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing an 8% tax of gross receipts for cannabis businesses to be spent on unrestricted general revenue purposes, including for police, fire and emergency services, parks, affordable housing, and street maintenance. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Horicon Elementary School District to issue $10.4 million in bonds, levying $0.03 per $100 in assessed value, to maintain and repair school facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Horicon Elementary School District to issue $10.4 million in bonds, levying $0.03 per $100 in assessed value, to maintain and repair school facilities. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Kenwood School District to issue $17 million in bonds, averaging $0.03 per $100 in assessed value, to repair and renovate classrooms and school infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Kenwood School District to issue $17 million in bonds, averaging $0.03 per $100 in assessed value, to repair and renovate classrooms and school infrastructure. |
• Santa Rosa, California, Measure H, Public Safety Services Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported renewing a public safety sales tax for 20 years, raising $10 million annually. |
A "no" vote opposed renewing a public safety sales tax for 20 years, raising $10 million annually. |
• Santa Rosa, California, Measure I, Affirm District Based Elections Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported affirming district based voting for the electing of Santa Rosy City Council members. |
A "no" vote opposed affirming district based voting for the electing of Santa Rosy City Council members. |
• Santa Rosa, California, Measure J, Update Language of City Charter Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the Santa Rosa City Charter to provide additional flexibility in city operations, and to provide gender neutral and citizenship neutral language. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the Santa Rosa City Charter to provide additional flexibility in city operations, and to provide gender neutral and citizenship neutral language. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Santa Rosa City Elementary School District to issue $125 million in bonds, levying $0.03 per $100 in assessed value, to upgrade classrooms and infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Santa Rosa City Elementary School District to issue $125 million in bonds, levying $0.03 per $100 in assessed value, to upgrade classrooms and infrastructure. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Santa Rosa Middle and High School District to issue $398 million in bonds and levying $0.03 per $100 in assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, to upgrade school classrooms and infrastructure. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Santa Rosa Middle and High School District to issue $398 million in bonds and levying $0.03 per $100 in assessed value, while bonds are outstanding, to upgrade school classrooms and infrastructure. |
• Schell-Vista Fire Protection District, California, Measure O, Tax Renewal Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported renewing a special tax of $200.00 for residential properties; $0.14 per square foot for lodging, commercial and industrial properties; and $100.00 for other parcels for four years. |
A "no" vote opposed renewing a special tax of $200.00 for residential properties; $0.14 per square foot for lodging, commercial and industrial properties; and $100.00 for other parcels for four years. |
• Sebastopol, California, Measure N, Extend Utility Users Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported extending the existing Utility Users Tax at the current rate of 3.75%. |
A "no" vote opposed extending the existing Utility Users Tax at the current rate of 3.75%. |
Stanislaus County
A “yes” vote supported decreasing the number of members on the governing board of the Knights Ferry Elementary School District from five members to three members. |
A “no” vote opposed decreasing the number of members on the governing board of the Knights Ferry Elementary School District from five members to three members. |
• Modesto, California, Measure G, City Charter Amendments Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to amend the duties of the city auditor, create a permanent audit committee, change the timing of the mayoral election to align with the statewide primary and general election, and adjust the timeline for the city budget. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to amend the duties of the city auditor, create a permanent audit committee, change the timing of the mayoral election to align with the statewide primary and general election, and adjust the timeline for the city budget. |
• Modesto, California, Measure H, General Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue dedicated to general services. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Modesto City High School District to issue $198,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $29 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Modesto City High School District to issue $198,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $29 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Patterson Joint Unified School District to issue $74,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $57 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Patterson Joint Unified School District to issue $74,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $57 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Waterford, California, Measure B, Terms for Mayor Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported establishing the term for mayor as a four-year term. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing the term for mayor as a four-year term. |
A “yes” vote supports authorizing the Waterford Unified School District to issue $5,570,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of up to $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote oppses authorizing the Waterford Unified School District to issue $5,570,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of up to $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $69 per parcel for public safety. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $69 per parcel for public safety. |
Sutter County
• Sutter County, California, Measure A, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported levying a $0.01 sales tax for nine years, with the revenue being used for general purposes for Sutter County. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a $0.01 sales tax for nine years, with the revenue being used for general purposes for Sutter County. |
• Yuba City, California, Measure Z, City Clerk and City Treasurer Position Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported changing the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer into appointed positions rather than elected offices. |
A "no" vote opposed changing the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer into appointed positions, and keeping them as elected offices. |
Trinity County
• Trinity County, California, Measure L, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported enacting an additional 5% tax on hotel stays in the county. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting an additional 5% tax on hotel stays in the county. |
Tulare County
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the College of the Sequoias Community College District to issue $95,000,000 in bonds to fund general facilities and programs improvements, and levying a property tax of $13 per $100,000 in assessed valuation. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the College of the Sequoias Community College District to issue $95,000,000 in bonds to fund general facilities and programs improvements, and levying a property tax of $13 per $100,000 in assessed valuation. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District to levy a tax of $48 per parcel, with funds directed to the district's sports programs and recreation department. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District to levy a tax of $48 per parcel, with funds directed to the district's sports programs and recreation department. |
• Exeter, California, Measure B, Cannabis Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 10% tax on cannabis businesses in the city to fund general city services until repealed by voters. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 10% tax on cannabis businesses in the city to fund general city services until repealed by voters. |
• Exeter Public Cemetery District, California, Measure U, Parcel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported levying a parcel tax of $35.00 per parcel, increased by 2.5% annually to account for inflation, to improve the conditions of cemeteries in the district, starting July 1, 2023. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a parcel tax of $35.00 per parcel, increased by 2.5% annually to account for inflation, to improve the conditions of cemeteries in the district, starting July 1, 2023. |
• Farmersville, California, Measure A, Hotel Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported establishing a 10% hotel tax to fund general services until repealed by voters. |
A "no" vote opposed establishing a 10% hotel tax to fund general services until repealed by voters. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Farmersville Unified School District to issue $8.6 million in bonds to fund improvements to school facilities and health and safety, and requiring a property tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Farmersville Unified School District to issue $8.6 million in bonds to fund improvements to school facilities and health and safety, and requiring a property tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Sundale Union Elementary School District to issue $4 million in bonds to fund improvements to school facilities, and requiring a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Sundale Union Elementary School District to issue $4 million in bonds to fund improvements to school facilities, and requiring a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Sundale Union Elementary School District to issue $3.8 million in bonds to fund improvements to school facilities and health accessibility, and requiring a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Sundale Union Elementary School District to issue $3.8 million in bonds to fund improvements to school facilities and health accessibility, and requiring a property tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Tulare, California, Measure Y, Cannabis Business Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 10% tax on cannabis businesses to fund general city services. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 10% tax on cannabis businesses to fund general city services. |
Tuolumne County
• Sonora, California, Measure Y, Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported enacting a 1% sales tax for 20 years. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a 1% sales tax for 20 years. |
• Tuolumne County, California, Measure X, Unincorporated Areas Sales Tax Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported enacting a sales tax of 1% in unincorporated areas of the county for 10 years and allocating the tax revenue as follows: 40% for the sheriff's department; 40% for the fire services; and 20% for road services. |
A "no" vote opposed enacting a sales tax of 1% in unincorporated areas of the county for 10 years and allocating the tax revenue as follows: 40% for the sheriff's department; 40% for the fire services; and 20% for road services. |
Ventura County
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Fillmore Unified School District to issue $41,600,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Fillmore Unified School District to issue $41,600,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $340,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $36 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Las Virgenes Unified School District to issue $340,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $36 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Mupu Elementary School District to issue $800,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school modernization and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Mupu Elementary School District to issue $800,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school modernization and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Mupu Elementary School District to issue $800,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Mupu Elementary School District to issue $800,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Ojai, California, Measure L, City Government Organization Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported establishing a method of governing with five elected city council members and a mayor selected from the five members. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing a method of governing with five elected city council members and a mayor selected from the five members. |
• Ojai, California, Measure M, Ranked-Choice Voting Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported establishing the use of ranked-choice voting, starting in the November 2024 general election. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing the use of ranked-choice voting, starting in the November 2024 general election. |
• Oxnard, California, Measure C, City Council Members and Mayor Term Limits Measure (November 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported establishing that city council members and the mayor may serve for two consecutive terms and must take a two-year break before serving again. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing that city council members and the mayor may serve for two consecutive terms and must take a two-year break before serving again. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Oxnard School District to issue $215,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Oxnard School District to issue $215,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Port Hueneme, California, Measure D, City Name Change Measure (November 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported changing the city's name from the City of Port Hueneme to the City of Hueneme Beach and amending the city's charter to reflect such. |
A “no” vote opposed changing the city's name from the City of Port Hueneme to the City of Hueneme Beach and amending the city's charter to reflect such. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Rio Elementary School to issue $72,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $21 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Rio Elementary School to issue $72,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $21 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Ventura Unified School District to issue $434,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Ventura Unified School District to issue $434,500,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school improvements and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
Yolo County
- See also: Yolo County, California ballot measures
• Esparto Unified School District, California, Measure L, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $19.9 million bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value for bond payments. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $19.9 million bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value for bond payments. |
• Woodland, California, Measure J, City Council Salary Increase Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported increasing the salary for Woodland City Council members from $250 to $500 per month. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the salary for Woodland City Council members from $250 to $500 per month. |
• Woodland, California, Measure K, Marijuana Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" |
A "no" |
Yuba County
- See also: Yuba County, California ballot measures
• Esparto Unified School District, California, Measure L, Bond Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $19.9 million bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value for bond payments. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $19.9 million bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value for bond payments. |
• Woodland, California, Measure J, City Council Salary Increase Measure (November 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported increasing the salary for Woodland City Council members from $250 to $500 per month. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the salary for Woodland City Council members from $250 to $500 per month. |
• Woodland, California, Measure K, Marijuana Tax Measure (November 2022): ✔
A "yes" |
A "no" |
October 19
Los Angeles County
A "yes" vote supported this initiative to repeal the city's ban on non-medical marijuana businesses and allow up to three marijuana retailers in Redondo Beach. |
A "no" vote opposed this initiative to repeal the city's ban on non-medical marijuana businesses and allow up to three marijuana retailers in Redondo Beach. |
August 30
Ballotpedia covered one local ballot measure.
Monterey County
A "yes" vote supported increasing the transactions and use tax by 0.5 percentage points for 40 years to provide funding for a community center and, after funding the center, for street maintenance and repair. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the transactions and use tax by 0.5 percentage points for 40 years to provide funding for a community center and, after funding the center, for street maintenance and repair. |
June 7
Ballotpedia covered 96 local ballot measures across California.
Alameda County
• Alameda Unified School District, California, Measure B, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Alameda Unified School District to issue up to $298 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund local schools and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $45 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Alameda Unified School District to issue up to $298 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund local schools and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $45 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Oakland, California, Measure C, Library Funding Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing for 30 years an existing annual parcel tax of $114.50 per parcel for single-family residential units, $78.22 per parcel for multi-unit residential property, and $58.65 for non-residential units, thereby generating an estimated $18 million per year for local libraries. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing for 30 years an existing annual parcel tax of $114.50 per parcel for single-family residential units, $78.22 per parcel for multi-unit residential property, and $58.65 for non-residential units, thereby generating an estimated $18 million per year for local libraries. |
Contra Costa County
• Contra Costa County, California, Measure G, Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program Fee (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported extending until April 30, 2032, the $1 annual fee per registered vehicle for the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program that removes and disposes of abandoned and wrecked vehicles. |
A "no" vote opposed extending until April 30, 2032, the $1 annual fee per registered vehicle for the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program that removes and disposes of abandoned and wrecked vehicles. |
• Martinez, California, Measure F, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported levying a $79 annual parcel tax for 30 years to generate approximately $1.2 million to acquire public parkland and wildlife habitat called Alhambra Highlands and fund parkland maintenance. |
A "no" vote opposed levying a $79 annual parcel tax for 30 years to generate approximately $1.2 million to acquire public parkland and wildlife habitat called Alhambra Highlands and fund parkland maintenance. |
El Dorado County
• Cascade Drainage Zone of Benefit 98393, California, Measure E, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported levying an annual parcel tax of $350 per parcel on property within the Cascade Drainage Zone of Benefit 98393 within County Service Area 3 to fund maintenance of drainage facilities for 19 years and generating approximately $12,950 per year. |
A "no" vote opposed levying an annual parcel tax of $350 per parcel on property within the Cascade Drainage Zone of Benefit 98393 within County Service Area 3 to fund maintenance of drainage facilities for 19 years and generating approximately $12,950 per year. |
A "yes" vote supported renewing the Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District's special fire tax, approved by voters in June 2018, for four years, thereby generating $205,416 per year for emergency fire and medical services. |
A "no" vote opposed renewing the Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District special fire tax of $660 per parcel to fund emergency fire and medical services. |
A "yes" vote supported increasing the maximum voter approved special tax from $300 per parcel per year to $600 in Knolls Property Owners Community Services District and increasing the special tax for road work, thereby generating $8,400 per year. |
A "no" vote opposed increasing the maximum voter approved special tax from $300 per parcel per year to $600 in Knolls Property Owners Community Services District and increasing the special tax for road work, thereby generating $8,400 per year. |
• Sundance Trail Zone of Benefit 98109, California, Measure C, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported levying an additional $300 annual parcel tax (bringing the total annual parcel tax to $600 per parcel) on land within the Sundance Trail Road Zone of Benefit 98109 within County Service Area 9 to fund road improvements and maintenance. |
A "no" vote opposed levying an additional $300 annual parcel tax (bringing the total annual parcel tax to $600 per parcel) on land within the Sundance Trail Road Zone of Benefit 98109 within County Service Area 9 to fund road improvements and maintenance. |
Fresno County
• Fresno, California, Measure Z, Chaffee Zoo Sales Tax Renewal (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported extending the 1/10th of 1% sales tax for 15 years, providing an estimated $15 million per year to fund Fresno Chaffee Zoo maintenance and improvements. |
A "no" vote opposed extending the 1/10th of 1% sales tax for 15 years, providing an estimated $15 million per year to fund Fresno Chaffee Zoo maintenance and improvements. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Westside Elementary School District to issue up to $4.5 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements, thereby generating approximately $261,000 per year, and levying an annual parcel tax of $0.03 per $100 assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Westside Elementary School District to issue up to $4.5 million in bonds to fund school facility improvements, thereby generating approximately $261,000 per year, and levying an annual parcel tax of $0.03 per $100 assessed value. |
Humboldt County
• Humboldt County, California, Measure J, Hotel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional hotel tax of 2% generating an estimated $3.08 million per year for the county, thereby increasing the total hotel tax rate in Humboldt County from 10% to 12%. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional hotel tax of 2% generating an estimated $3.08 million per year for the county, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Humboldt County at 10%. |
• Humboldt County, California, Measure K, Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an additional vehicle registration fee of $1 per vehicle and $2 for some commercial vehicles to fund removal and disposal of locally abandoned vehicles. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an additional vehicle registration fee of $1 per vehicle and $2 for some commercial vehicles to fund removal and disposal of locally abandoned vehicles. |
Imperial County
• El Centro Elementary School District, California, Measure Y, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported issuing $37.8 million in general obligations bonds for a new school and classroom renovations and levying a property tax of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $37.8 million in general obligations bonds for a new school and classroom renovations and levying a property tax of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Imperial, California, Measure V, Appointed Clerk Measure (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported making the city clerk an appointed position. |
A "no" vote opposed making the city clerk an appointed position. |
• Imperial Unified School District, California, Measure A, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported issuing $50 million in general obligations bonds for a pool and new technical education facility and levying a property tax of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $50 million in general obligations bonds for a pool and new technical education facility and levying a property tax of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value. |
• Westmorland Union Elementary School District, California, Measure W, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported issuing $3.75 million in general obligations bonds for a gymnasium. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $3.75 million in general obligations bonds for a gymnasium. |
• Westmorland Union Elementary School District, California, Measure Z, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported issuing $3.75 million in general obligations bonds for a gymnasium. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $3.75 million in general obligations bonds for a gymnasium. |
Kern County
- See also: Kern County, California ballot measures
• Muroc Joint Unified School District, California, Measure B, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported issuing $21 million in bonds for schools and levying a tax of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $21 million in bonds for schools and levying a tax of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds are outstanding. |
• Sierra Sands Unified School District, California, Measure C, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported issuing $52.8 million in bonds for schools and levying a tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $52.8 million in bonds for schools and levying a tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
Kings County
- See also: Kings County, California ballot measures
• Kings County, California, Measure F, Fire and Emergency Services Sales Tax (June 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $11.7 million per year for emergency and fire services, thereby increasing the county-level sales tax rate in Kings County from 0.25% to 0.75%. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5%, thereby leaving the existing county-level sales tax rate in Kings County at 0.25%. |
Los Angeles County
• Antelope Valley Healthcare District, California, Measure H, Hospital Bond (June 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Antelope Valley Healthcare District to issue up to $400 million in bonds over 30 years with bond revenue going to fund local hospitals. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Antelope Valley Healthcare District to issue up to $400 million in bonds over 30 years with bond revenue going to fund local hospitals. |
• Avalon City, California, Measure S, Sales Tax (June 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% generating an estimated $250,000 per year, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Avalon from 10% to 10.25%. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% in the city of Avalon. |
• Avalon City, California, Measure TT, Hotel Tax (June 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional transient occupancy tax of 1% for 10 years generating an estimated $500,000 per year, thereby increasing the total hotel tax rate in Avalon from 12% to 13%. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional transient occupancy tax of 1% for 10 years in the city of Avalon. |
• Beverly Hills City, California, Measure TL, Term Limits Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a limit of three total terms for city council members and the city treasurer in Beverly Hills. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a limit of three total terms for city council members and the city treasurer in Beverly Hills. |
• Glendale Unified School District, California, Measure T, Term Limits Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a limit of three total terms for members of the Glendale Unified School District's Board of Trustees. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a limit of three total terms for members of the Glendale Unified School District's Board of Trustees. |
• Little Lake City School District, California, Measure LL, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Little Lake City School District to issue up to $36 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund classroom repairs and health and safety, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $0.03 per $100 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Little Lake City School District to issue up to $36 million in bonds. |
• Los Angeles, California, Measure BB, Charter Amendment (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing amendments to the Los Angeles City Charter which would allow Los Angeles locals to receive bid preference in the city's bidding system. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing amendments to the Los Angeles City Charter which would allow Los Angeles locals to receive bid preference in the city's bidding system. |
• Lynwood City, California, Measure R, Term Limits Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a limit of three consecutive terms for members of the Lynwood city council. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a limit of three consecutive terms for members of the Lynwood city council. |
• Manhattan Beach City, California, Measure A, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 12 years an annual parcel tax of $1,095 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $11-13 million per year for education funding in Manhattan Beach. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 12 years an annual parcel tax of $1,095 per parcel in Manhattan Beach. |
• Monrovia City, California, Measure RM, Elections Measure (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the adoption of an ordinance which would eliminate elections for the mayor of Monrovia and establish a rotation of city council members to fill the offices of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the adoption of an ordinance which would eliminate elections for the mayor of Monrovia. |
• South Gate City, California, Measure CC, Elections Measure (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing South Gate to make the office of City Clerk an appointive position rather than elective. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing South Gate to make the office of City Clerk an appointive position rather than elective. |
• Torrance City, California, Measure SST, Sales Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5%, generating an estimated $18 million per year for Torrance. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% in Torrance. |
Madera County
• Chowchilla Union High School District, California, Measure S, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supports issuing $25.1 million in general obligations bonds to construct a career technical education center, install new sports fields, and replace heating, air conditioning and ventilation systems, and enact a property tax of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposes issuing $25.1 million in general obligations bonds to construct a career technical education center, install new sports fields, and replace heating, air conditioning and ventilation systems, and enact a property tax of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
Marin County
- See also: Marin County, California ballot measures
• Kentfield Fire Protection District, California, Measure K, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $265,500 per year for paramedic services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel for paramedic services. |
• Larkspur, California, Measure H, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $680,000 per year for paramedic services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel for paramedic services. |
• Larkspur-Corte Madera School District, California, Measure E, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing for 10 years an existing annual parcel tax of $910 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $4 million per year for the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing for 10 years an existing annual parcel tax of $910 per parcel, thereby allowing the existing parcel tax to expire. |
• Marin County, California, Measure A, Parks and Open Spaces Sales Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing a sales tax of 0.25% for 9 years with revenue dedicated to local parks and open spaces, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Marin County at 8%. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing a current sales tax of 0.25% for 9 years with revenue dedicated to local parks, thereby allowing the existing tax to expire and decreasing the total sales tax rate in Marin County to 7.75%. |
• Mesa Park Firehouse Community Park Agency, California, Measure M, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $75 per parcel to replace an existing parcel tax, thereby generating an estimated $40,000 per year for Mesa Park. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $75 per parcel to replace an existing parcel tax funding Mesa Park. |
• Mill Valley School District, California, Measure G, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Mill Valley School District to issue up to $194 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $26 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Mill Valley School District to issue up to $194 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $26 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Ross, California, Measure I, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $93,000 per year for paramedic services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel for paramedic services. |
• San Anselmo, California, Measure J, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $560,000 per year for paramedic services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel for paramedic services. |
• San Rafael City Elementary School District, California, Measure C, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the San Rafael City Elementary School District to issue up to $152 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the San Rafael City Elementary School District to issue up to $152 in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• San Rafael City High School District, California, Measure B, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the San Rafael City High School District to issue up to $216 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the San Rafael City High School District to issue up to $216 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Sleepy Hollow Fire Protection District, California, Measure L, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $85,995 per year for paramedic services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 4 years an annual parcel tax of $94.50 per parcel for paramedic services. |
Mariposa County
• Mariposa County, California, Measure O, Sales Tax to Fund Hospital Construction (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a 1% sales tax for 40 years to fund construction of a new hospital in the John C. Fremont Healthcare District. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a 1% sales tax for 40 years to fund construction of a new hospital in the John C. Fremont Healthcare District. |
Mendocino County
• Anderson Valley Unified School District, California, Measure M, School Bonds Measure (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Anderson Valley Unified School District to issue up to $13 million in bonds, requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Anderson Valley Unified School District to issue up to $13 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
Merced County
• Merced River School District, California, Measure T, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported issuing $3.5 million in general obligation bonds for classrooms, labs, and athletic spaces, along with other education-related and facilities-related projects, and levying a tax of $30.00 per $100,000 in assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $3.5 million in general obligation bonds for classrooms, labs, and athletic spaces, along with other education-related and facilities-related projects, and levying a tax of $30.00 per $100,000 in assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
Monterey County
• Del Rey Oaks, California, Measure B, FORTAG Trail Initiative (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supports prohibiting Del Rey Oaks from constructing the tunnel proposed under FORTAG (Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway) and restricting placement of bike and recreation trails to Highway 218, General Jim Moore Boulevard, and South Boundary Road. |
A "no" vote opposes prohibiting Del Rey Oaks from constructing the tunnel proposed under FORTAG (Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway) and restricting placement of bike and recreation trails to Highway 218, General Jim Moore Boulevard, and South Boundary Road. |
• San Lucas Union School District, California, Measure C, School Facilities Bond Issue (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supports authorizing San Lucas Union School District to issue $3,600,000 in bonds and levy a tax of $60 per $100,000 assessed value, estimated to generate $240,000 per year to fund school facilities improvements. |
A "no" vote opposes authorizing San Lucas Union School District to issue $3,600,000 in bonds and levy a tax of $60 per $100,000 assessed value, estimated to generate $240,000 per year to fund school facilities improvements. |
Napa County
- See also: Napa County, California ballot measures
• American Canyon, California, Measure I A, Mayor Term Limits Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an ordinance which would limit the mayor to serving no more than 3 total 4-year terms. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an ordinance which would limit the mayor to serving no more than 3 total 4-year terms. |
• American Canyon, California, Measure I B, City Council Term Limits Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an ordinance which would limit city council members to serving no more than 3 total 4-year terms. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an ordinance which would limit city council members to serving no more than 3 total 4-year terms. |
• Napa County, California, Measure L, Fire Protection Sales Tax (June 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% for 10 years generating an estimated $10 million per year for fire protection, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Napa County from 7.75% to 8%. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 10 years an additional sales tax of 0.25% generating an estimated $10 million per year for fire protection, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Napa County at 7.75%. |
• St. Helena, California, Measure G, Appointed Mayor Measure (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an ordinance which would replace the current direct election for mayor of St. Helena with a process of appointment by city council members. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an ordinance which would replace the current direct election for mayor of St. Helena with a process of appointment by city council members. |
• St. Helena, California, Measure H, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the city of St. Helena to issue up to $19.15 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund local water treatment and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $14.82 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the city of St. Helena to issue up to $19.15 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund local water treatment and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $14.82 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
Nevada County
• Truckee, California, Measure U, Trails Tax Renewal and Increase (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported renewing and increasing (from 0.25% to 0.50%) the Truckee trails tax to fund the repair and maintenance of trails, multi-use paths, and lanes for biking, walking, and hiking. |
A "no" vote opposed renewing and increasing (from 0.25% to 0.50%) the Truckee trails tax to fund the repair and maintenance of trails, multi-use paths, and lanes for biking, walking, and hiking. |
Orange County
• Huntington Beach, California, Measure A, Cannabis Tax (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported implementing a special tax of up to 6% on the gross receipts of cannabis retailers and 1% on other cannabis businesses to fund police, homeless prevention, behavioral health services, and intervention programs. |
A "no" vote opposed implementing a special tax of up to 6% on the gross receipts of cannabis retailers and 1% on other cannabis businesses to fund police, homeless prevention, behavioral health services, and intervention programs. |
• Newport Beach, California, Measure B, Mayoral Elections Charter Amendment (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported providing for the at-large direct election of the mayor by registered voters of the City of Newport Beach. |
A "no" vote opposed providing for the at-large election of the mayor by registered voters of the City of Newport Beach. |
A "yes" vote supported eliminating the office of mayor and increases the number of councilmembers from four to five. |
A "no" vote opposed the measure, thereby maintaining the office of mayor and maintaining that the city have four councilmembers. |
Placer County
A "yes" vote supported reauthorizing the 2% North Lake Tahoe Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) hotel tax that is remitted to Placer County by lodging owners, which was otherwise set to expire on September 30, 2022. |
A "no" vote opposed reauthorizing the 2% North Lake Tahoe Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) hotel tax that is remitted to Placer County by lodging owners, thereby letting the tax expire on September 30, 2022. |
Sacramento County
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $90 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $130,000 per year for fire protection and emergency services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $90 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $130,000 per year for fire protection and emergency services. |
• Sacramento, California, Measure C, Vehicle Abatement Program Fee Renewal (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported extending for 10 years the $1 annual fee per registered vehicle for the Sacramento County Vehicle Abatement Program that removes and disposes of abandoned and wrecked vehicles. |
A "no" vote opposed extending for 10 years the $1 annual fee per registered vehicle for the Sacramento County Vehicle Abatement Program that removes and disposes of abandoned and wrecked vehicles. |
San Bernardino County
• Chino, California, Measure Y, Housing Element Update Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supports a change to the City of Chino's Housing Element Plan for 2021-2029 to meet the state's Regional Housing Needs Assessment. |
A "no" vote opposes a change to the City of Chino's Housing Element Plan for 2021-2029 to meet the state's Regional Housing Needs Assessment. |
• Muroc Joint Unified School District, California, Measure B, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported issuing $21 million in bonds for schools and levying a tax of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $21 million in bonds for schools and levying a tax of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds are outstanding. |
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to repeal the special $117 parcel tax associated with Fire Protection Services Zone Five. |
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to repeal the special $117 parcel tax associated with Fire Protection Services Zone Five. |
• Sierra Sands Unified School District, California, Measure C, Bond Measure (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported issuing $52.8 million in bonds for schools and levying a tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
A "no" vote opposed issuing $52.8 million in bonds for schools and levying a tax of $60 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding. |
San Francisco
• San Francisco, California, Proposition A, Public Transportation and Streets Bond Issue (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $400 million in bonds to fund improvements to public transportation infrastructure, equipment, and facilities and to construct and improve streets and sidewalks and requiring property taxes at a rate of $10 per $100,000 in assessed value to repay the bonds over up to 30 years. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $400 million in bonds to fund improvements to public transportation infrastructure, equipment, and facilities and to construct and improve streets and sidewalks. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to
|
A "no" vote opposed this charter amendment, thereby leaving the following policies in place:
|
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to make the following changes to recall process rules:
|
A "no" vote opposed this charter amendment thereby leaving the existing recall rules in place that:
|
A "yes" vote supported creating an Office of Victim and Witness Rights to provide or coordinate services for victims and witnesses. |
A "no" vote opposed this measure to create an Office of Victim and Witness Rights to provide or coordinate services for victims and witnesses. |
A "yes" vote supported prohibiting supervisors from soliciting donations—called behested payments—from contractors with contracts approved by those supervisors and requiring approval by the ethics commission and a two-thirds vote of supervisors to change behested payment laws. |
A "no" vote opposed this measure prohibiting supervisors from soliciting donations from contractors with contracts approved by those supervisors and requiring approval by the ethics commission and a two-thirds vote of supervisors to change behested payment laws, thereby leaving existing laws governing behested payments in place. |
A "yes" vote supported making the following changes to the city's refuse collection and disposal governance:
|
A "no" vote opposed this measure to change the membership of the refuse rate board and the governance of refuse rates, thereby leaving the following in place:
|
A "yes" vote supported requiring employers with more than 100 employees—including the city—to provide paid public health emergency leave in addition to existing paid sick leave equal to the number of hours an employee works in a normal two-week period up to 80 hours per year that could be used under the following scenarios:
|
A "no" vote opposed this measure to create a paid public health emergency leave requirement for all employers with more than 100 employees, thereby leaving the existing paid sick leave policies in place. |
San Luis Obispo County
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $180 per parcel in the Oceano Community Services District, thereby generating an estimated $410,760 per year for emergency medical and fire services. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $180 per parcel in the Oceano Community Services District. |
San Mateo County
• Belmont-Redwood Shores School District, California, Measure C, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing for 10 years an existing annual parcel tax of $292 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $3.5 million per year for local elementary school funding. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing for 10 years an existing annual parcel tax of $292 per parcel, thereby allowing the existing parcel tax to expire on July 1, 2023. |
• Brisbane School District, California, Measure G, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing for 6 years an existing annual parcel tax of $131 per parcel, with the exemption of seniors, thereby generating an estimated $450,000 per year for local elementary school funding. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing for 6 years an existing annual parcel tax of $131 per parcel, thereby allowing the existing parcel tax to expire on July 1, 2022. |
• Hillsborough City School District, California, Measure H, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Hillsborough City School District to issue up to $140 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Hillsborough City School District to issue up to $140 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Jefferson Elementary School District, California, Measure J, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Jefferson Elementary School District to issue up to $45 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $15.70 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Jefferson Elementary School District to issue up to $45 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $15.70 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Millbrae Elementary School District, California, Measure E, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Millbrae Elementary School District to issue up to $90 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Millbrae Elementary School District to issue up to $90 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
• Ravenswood City School District, California, Measure I, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Ravenswood City School District to issue up to $110 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Ravenswood City School District to issue up to $110 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
Santa Clara County
• Alum Rock Union School District, California, Measure I, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing for 7 years an existing annual parcel tax of $214.10 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $4.5 million per year for Alum Rock Union Elementary School District funding. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing for 7 years an existing annual parcel tax of $214.10 per parcel, thereby allowing the existing parcel tax to expire in 2022. |
• Fremont Union High School District, California, Measure G, Bond Issue (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Fremont Union High School District to issue up to $275 million in bonds, requiring an estimated property tax levy of $0.015 per $100 in assessed value. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Fremont Union High School District to issue up to $275 million in bonds. |
• Milpitas Unified School District, California, Measure E, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing for 8 years an existing annual parcel tax of $84 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.6 million per year for the Milpitas Unified School District. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing for 8 years an existing annual parcel tax of $84 per parcel, thereby allowing the existing parcel tax to expire in 2022. |
• Mount Pleasant School District, California, Measure H, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported renewing for 7 years an existing annual parcel tax of $95 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $480,000 per year for Mount Pleasant Elementary School District funding. |
A “no” vote opposed renewing for 7 years an existing annual parcel tax of $95 per parcel, thereby allowing the existing parcel tax to expire in 2022. |
• San Jose, California, Measure B, Mayor Elections Charter Amendment (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported this charter amendment to: • move the mayoral election to presidential years beginning in 2024; • provide that the term of the person elected mayor in 2022 is two years, rather than four years; and • provide that the person elected in 2022 is eligible for two full four-years terms in addition to the shorter two-year term. |
A "no" vote opposed this charter amendment to move the mayoral election to the same date as the presidential election. |
• Santa Clara, California, Measure D, City Council Elections Charter Amendment (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing a charter amendment to elect Santa Clara City Council Members by district, with the exception of the mayor, and establish a 30-day residency requirement for City Council candidacy. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing a charter amendment to elect Santa Clara City Council Officials by district. |
• Santa Clara Valley Water District, California, Measure A, Term Limits Measure (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an amendment to the Santa Clara Valley Water District Ordinance, limiting district Board members to no more than 4 consecutive terms and establishing 4-year term limits. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an amendment regarding term limits for Board Members to the Santa Clara Valley Water District Ordinance. |
Santa Cruz County
• Santa Cruz, California, Measure E, Elected Mayor Charter Amendment (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the Santa Cruz City Charter to:
|
A "no" vote opposed this charter amendment, resulting in city council members being elected from seven council districts and the mayor being selected from among council members, per a lawsuit settlement under the California Voting Rights Act. |
• Santa Cruz, California, Measure F, Sales Tax Increase (June 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $6 million per year, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Santa Cruz from 9.25% to 9.75%. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $6 million per year, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Santa Cruz from 9.25% to 9.75%. |
• Santa Cruz County, California, Measure B, Hotel Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase in the tax rate of overnight lodging in Santa Cruz County, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate at hotels, motels, and inns from 11% to 12%, and to 14% at vacation rentals. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase in the tax rate of overnight lodging in Santa Cruz, and would maintain the existing tax rate of 11%. |
• Santa Cruz County, California, Measure C, Single-Use Cup Tax (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the county of Santa Cruz to collect $0.125 as a general-purpose tax out of a $0.25 single-use cup charge collected by the sellers, which was set to be put in place starting July 1, 2022. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the county of Santa Cruz to collect $0.125 as a general-purpose tax out of a $0.25 single-use cup charge collected by the sellers, which was set to be be put in place starting July 1, 2022. |
A “yes” vote supported amending the County General Plan to: • use the Santa Cruz Branch Line Corridor (SCBLC) as an interim multi-use trail for "commuting, active transportation, and recreation by pedestrians, bicycles, wheelchairs, e-bikes, skateboards, and personal e-mobility," depending on approval of railbanking, and • repeal provisions that support developing the SCBLC for passenger and goods rail transportation and as a bicycle/pedestrian trail. |
A “no” vote opposed amending the County General Plan, thus: • maintaining provisions on using the SCBLC for “possible future passenger rail transportation" and as a bicycle/pedestrian trail and • not adding provisions on using the corridor as an interim multi-use trail. |
Siskiyou County
• Siskiyou County, California, Measure P, Appointed County Auditor-Controller (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported making the position of Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller appointed by the board of supervisors rather than elected effective January 1, 2027. |
A "no" vote opposed making the position of Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller appointed by the board of supervisors, thereby leaving it as an elected position. |
Sonoma County
• Kenwood School District, California, Measure A, Parcel Tax Renewal (June 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $52 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $110,000 per year for the school district. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $52 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $110,000 per year for the school district. |
Tulare County
• Exeter Public Cemetery District, California, Measure U, Parcel Tax (June 2022): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $35 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $270,000 per year for local cemeteries. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $35 per parcel to fund local cemeteries. |
Tuolumne County
• Tuolumne South County Ambulance Zone, California, Measure W, Parcel Tax Renewal (June 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported extending the annual $90.00 per parcel tax in South County Ambulance Zone of County Service Area No. 21, thereby generating $340,650 annually, for five years, to fund emergency medical services. |
A "no" vote opposed extending the annual $90.00 per parcel tax in South County Ambulance Zone of County Service Area No. 21, thereby generating $340,650 annually, for five years, to fund emergency medical services. |
Ventura County
• Ventura County, California, Measure A, Oil and Gas Well Regulation Referendum (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the amendment of Ventura county's coastal zoning ordinance to regulate the exploration and production of oil and gas. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the amendment of Ventura county's coastal zoning ordinance to regulate the exploration and production of oil and gas. |
• Ventura County, California, Measure B, Oil and Gas Well Regulations Referendum (June 2022): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the amendment of Ventura county's non-coastal zoning ordinance to regulate the exploration and production of oil and gas. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the amendment of Ventura county's non-coastal zoning ordinance to regulate the exploration and production of oil and gas. |
May 3
Ballotpedia covered two local ballot measures on May 3.
Alameda County
• Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District, Measure A, Parcel Tax Measure (May 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the school district to extend a $138.00-per-year parcel tax for seven years from July 1, 2022, to July 1, 2029. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the school district to extend a $138.00-per-year parcel tax for seven additional years, thus causing the parcel tax to expire on July 1, 2022. |
Contra Costa County
• Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District, Measure A, Parcel Tax Measure (May 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the school district to extend a $138.00-per-year parcel tax for seven years from July 1, 2022, to July 1, 2029. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the school district to extend a $138.00-per-year parcel tax for seven additional years, thus causing the parcel tax to expire on July 1, 2022. |
Plumas County
• Peninsula Fire Protection District, California, Measure A, Parcel Tax Measure (May 2022): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Peninsula Fire Protection District to enact an annual parcel tax of $442.50 (improved parcel) and $394.50 (unimproved parcel) to replace the existing parcel tax of $292.50 (improved parcel) and $277.50 (unimproved parcel). |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Peninsula Fire Protection District to enact an annual parcel tax of $442.50 (improved parcel) and $394.50 (unimproved parcel) to replace the existing parcel tax of $292.50 (improved parcel) and $277.50 (unimproved parcel). |
April 12
Ballotpedia covered two local ballot measures on April 12 in Pacific Grove in Monterey County and the Paradise Ranch Estates Permanent Road Division in Marin County.
Marin County
- See also: Marin County, California ballot measures
• Paradise Ranch Estates Permanent Road Division, California, Measure R, Parcel Tax (April 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $968 per parcel for 10 years, and then $125 per parcel for the following 15 years, for ongoing maintenance. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $968 per parcel for 10 years to fund the road division's activity and then $125 per parcel for the following 15 years for ongoing maintenance. |
Monterey County
• Pacific Grove, California, Measure A, Sales Tax (April 2022): ✔
A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $1.1 million per year, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Pacific Grove from 8.75% to 9.25%. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $1.1 million per year, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Pacific Grove at 8.75%. |
Statewide ballot measures
- See also: California 2022 ballot measures
| Type | Title | Description | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposition 1 | Provide a state constitutional right to reproductive freedom, defined to include abortion and contraceptives |
|
7,176,883 (67%) |
3,553,561 (33%) |
|
| Proposition 26 | Legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California |
|
3,514,593 (33%) |
7,129,122 (67%) |
|
| Proposition 27 | Legalize online and mobile sports betting in California |
|
1,906,339 (18%) |
8,849,200 (82%) |
|
| Proposition 28 | Require funding for K-12 art and music education |
|
6,924,613 (64%) |
3,827,967 (36%) |
|
| Proposition 29 | Enact staffing requirements, reporting requirements, ownership disclosure, and closing requirements for chronic dialysis clinics |
|
3,364,404 (32%) |
7,281,196 (68%) |
|
| Proposition 30 | Create a 1.75% tax on personal income above $2 million and allocate revenue for zero-emissions vehicle and wildfire programs |
|
4,560,483 (42%) |
6,203,806 (58%) |
|
| Proposition 31 | Uphold a ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products |
|
6,803,424 (63%) |
3,923,383 (37%) |
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in California
Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in California.
| How to cast a vote in California | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll timesAll polls in California are open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Pacific Time. An individual who is in line at the time polls close must be allowed to vote.[1] Registration
To vote in California, an individual must be a U.S. citizen and California resident. A voter must be at least 18 years of age on Election Day. Pre-registration is available at 16 years of age. Pre-registered voters are automatically registered to vote when they turn 18.[2] Automatic registrationCalifornia automatically registers eligible individuals to vote when they complete a driver's license, identification (ID) card, or change of address transaction through the Department of Motor Vehicles. Learn more by visiting this website. Online registration
California has implemented an online voter registration system. Residents can register to vote by visiting this website. Same-day registrationCalifornia allows same-day voter registration. Californians must be registered to vote at least 15 days before Election Day. If the registration deadline has passed for an upcoming election, voters may visit a location designated by their county elections official during the 14 days prior to, and including Election Day to conditionally register to vote and vote a provisional ballot, which are counted once county election officials have completed the voter registration verification process. The state refers to this process as Same Day Voter Registration.[3][4] Residency requirementsTo register to vote in California, you must be a resident of the state. State law does not specify a length of time for which you must have been a resident to be eligible. Verification of citizenshipCalifornia's constitution requires that voters be U.S. citizens. When registering to vote, proof of citizenship is not required. Individuals who become U.S. citizens less than 15 days before an election must bring proof of citizenship to their county elections office to register to vote in that election. An individual applying to register to vote must attest that they are a U.S. citizen under penalty of perjury.[3] As of November 2024, two jurisdictions in California had authorized noncitizen residents to vote for local board of education positions through local ballot measures. Only one of those jurisdictions, San Francisco, had implemented that law. Noncitizens voting for board of education positions must register to vote using a separate application from the state voter registration application.[5] All 49 states with voter registration systems require applicants to declare that they are U.S. citizens in order to register to vote in state and federal elections, under penalty of perjury or other punishment.[6] Seven states — Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Wyoming — have laws requiring verification of citizenship at the time of voter registration, whether in effect or not. In three states — California, Maryland, and Vermont — at least one local jurisdiction allows noncitizens to vote in some local elections. Noncitizens registering to vote in those elections must complete a voter registration application provided by the local jurisdiction and are not eligible to register as state or federal voters. Verifying your registrationThe secretary of state's My Voter Status website allows residents to check their voter registration status online. Voter ID requirementsCalifornia does not require voters to present identification before casting a ballot in most cases. However, some voters may be asked to show a form of identification when voting if they are voting for the first time after registering to vote by mail and did not provide a driver license number, California identification number, or the last four digits of their social security number.[7][8] On September 29, 2024, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed SB 1174 into law prohibiting any jurisdiction in the state from adopting a local law that requires voters to present ID before voting.[9] The following list of accepted ID was current as of October 2024. Click here for the California Secretary of State page to ensure you have the most current information.
| |||||
Additional elections
- See also: California elections, 2022
Click "Show" to learn more about other elections Ballotpedia covered in California in 2022.
See also
- Local ballot measure elections in 2022
- California parcel tax on the ballot
- Local sales tax on the ballot
Footnotes
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Section 3: Polling Place Hours," accessed August 12, 2024
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Voter Registration," accessed August 13, 2024
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 California Secretary of State, "Registering to Vote," accessed August 13, 2024
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Same Day Voter Registration (Conditional Voter Registration)," accessed August 13, 2024
- ↑ SF.gov, "Non-citizen voting rights in local Board of Education elections," accessed November 14, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "What to Bring to Your Polling Place," accessed August 12, 2024
- ↑ BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, "Section 20107," accessed August 12, 2024
- ↑ Democracy Docket, "California Governor Signs Law to Ban Local Voter ID Requirements," September 30, 2024
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
