It’s the 12 Days of Ballotpedia! Your gift powers the trusted, unbiased information voters need heading into 2026. Donate now!
California Amendment 44, City and Town Classification Measure (1910)
| California Amendment 36 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Election date |
|
| Topic State judiciary |
|
| Status |
|
| Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
California Amendment 44 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on November 8, 1910. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to provide for the classification of cities and towns by population in order to regulate the banking business. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the state constitution to provide for the classification of cities and towns by population in order to regulate the banking business. |
Election results
|
California Amendment 44 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
|
|
118,970 | 71.00% | ||
| No | 48,583 | 29.00% | ||
-
- Results are officially certified.
- Source
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Amendment 44 was as follows:
| “ | Providing for the classification by the legislature of cities ami towns by population for the purpose of regulating the business of banking. | ” |
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the California Constitution
A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
 |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
