Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

California Proposition 18, Non-Lawyer Judges on Municipal Courts Amendment (1956)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
California Proposition 18
Flag of California.png
Election date
November 6, 1956
Topic
State judiciary
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

California Proposition 18 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on November 6, 1956. It was defeated.

A “yes” vote supported allowing a judge of a justice court who has served continuously since November 7, 1945 but is not a lawyer to serve as a judge on a superseding municipal court that is established prior to January 1, 1960.

A “no” vote opposed allowing a judge of a justice court who has served continuously since November 7, 1945 but is not a lawyer to serve as a judge on a superseding municipal court that is established prior to January 1, 1960.


Election results

California Proposition 18

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 1,253,946 31.44%

Defeated No

2,734,306 68.56%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 18 was as follows:

Inferior Court Judges

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 63. Makes judge of a justice court eligible for office as judge of a superseding municipal court established before January 1, 1960, even though he is not an attorney, where he has served as inferior court judge continuously since November 7, 1945.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the California Constitution

A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.

See also


External links

Footnotes