California Proposition 2, Facilities Bond Measure (1964)
| California Proposition 2 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Election date November 3, 1964 | |
| Topic Education | |
Status Approved | |
| Type Bond issue | Origin State Legislature |
California Proposition 2 was on the ballot as a bond issue in California on November 3, 1964. It was approved.
A “yes” vote supported allowing for the issuance of bonds up to $380,000,000 for state college, junior college, university, mental illness, narcotics control, and forest fire fighting facilities and establishing the terms of such bonds. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing for the issuance of bonds up to $380,000,000 for state college, junior college, university, mental illness, narcotics control, and forest fire fighting facilities and establishing the terms of such bonds. |
Election results
|
California Proposition 2 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
|
|
4,108,348 | 64.91% | ||
| No | 2,220,719 | 35.09% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 2 was as follows:
| “ | Bonds to Provide State College | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
| “ | This act provides for a bond issue of three hundred eighty million dollars ($380,000,000) to provide state college, junior college and university facilities, and to provide funds to meet the building needs of the state, including facilities to care for mentally retarded and mentally ill and narcotics control, correctional and forest fire fighting facilities. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
A simple majority vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the measure to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
 |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
