Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
California Proposition 20, Amendments to the Boxing and Wresting Initiative Act Amendment (1962)
California Proposition 20 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date November 6, 1962 | |
Topic State legislatures measures | |
Status![]() | |
Type Constitutional amendment | Origin State legislature |
California Proposition 20 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on November 6, 1962. It was approved.
A “yes” vote supported allowing the legislature to amend the Boxing and Wrestling initiative act of November 4, 1924 and prohibiting the legislature from banning wrestling and 12-round boxing contests. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing the legislature to amend the Boxing and Wrestling initiative act of November 4, 1924 and prohibiting the legislature from banning wrestling and 12-round boxing contests. |
Election results
California Proposition 20 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
2,565,665 | 58.30% | |||
No | 1,834,760 | 41.70% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 20 was as follows:
“ | Boxing and Wrestling Contests | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
“ | Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 57. Provides Legislature may amend Boxing and Wrestling initiative act of November 4, 1924, but shall not have power to prohibit wrestling and 12-round boxing contests. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the California Constitution
A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |