It’s the 12 Days of Ballotpedia! Your gift powers the trusted, unbiased information voters need heading into 2026. Donate now!
California Proposition 37, State Fairgrounds Bond Measure (1914)
| California Proposition 37 | |
|---|---|
| Election date November 3. 1914 | |
| Topic Bond issues | |
| Status | |
| Type Bond issue | Origin State Legislature |
California Proposition 37 was on the ballot as a bond issue in California on November 3, 1914. It was defeated.
A “yes” vote supported providing for the issuance of $750,000 in state bonds to improve the state fairgrounds in the city of Sacramento and establishing the terms for such bonds. |
A “no” vote opposed providing for the issuance of $750,000 in state bonds to improve the state fairgrounds in the city of Sacramento and establishing the terms for such bonds. |
Election results
|
California Proposition 37 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 259,721 | 46.26% | ||
| 301,764 | 53.74% | |||
-
- Results are officially certified.
- Source
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 37 was as follows:
| “ | State Fair Grounds Bonds | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
| “ | FOR THE STATE FAIR GROUNDS BONDS. This act provides for the issuance and sale of state bonds in the sum of $750,000 for improvement of the state fair grounds at Sacramento, payable in fifty years, and bearing interest at four per cent. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
A simple majority vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the measure to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
State of California Sacramento (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |