Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

California Proposition 4, Parks, Environment, Energy, and Water Bond Measure (2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge-smaller use.png

U.S. Senate • U.S. House • Congressional special elections • State Senate • State Assembly • State ballot measures • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • Recalls • All other local • How to run for office
Flag of California.png


California Proposition 4
Flag of California.png
Election date
November 5, 2024
Topic
Bond issues and Environment
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Bond issue
Origin
State Legislature

California Proposition 4, the Parks, Environment, Energy, and Water Bond Measure, was on the ballot in California as a legislatively referred bond act on November 5, 2024.[1][2] The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported issuing $10 billion in bonds to fund state and local parks, environmental protection projects, water infrastructure projects, energy projects, and flood protection projects.

A "no" vote opposed issuing $10 billion in bonds to fund state and local parks, environmental protection projects, water infrastructure projects, energy projects, and flood protection projects.


Election results

California Proposition 4

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

9,055,116 59.80%
No 6,086,414 40.20%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What funding did Proposition 4 authorize?

See also: Text of measure

Proposition 4 authorized the state to issue $10 billion in bonds to fund various environmental, energy, and water projects. The funds were allocated to the following categories and projects:[2][3]

Click 'Show' below to see the table.


Proposition 4 also required that 40% of the bond revenue be used to fund activities benefiting communities with lower incomes or those affected by environmental changes or disasters. The bond measure required the secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to publish a list of programs and projects on the agency's website for public access. The report was required to list each project.[2]

Had California voters decided on bonds related to the environment before?

See also: Bond issues on the ballot in California

Between 1993 and 2024, California voters decided on six bond measures related to parks and the environment, of which four were approved and two were defeated. The total amount of bonds approved related to parks and the environment was nearly $9.7 billion.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[4]

Authorizes bonds for safe drinking water, wildfire prevention, and protecting communities and natural lands from climate risks. Legislative statute.

[5]

Ballot summary

The ballot summary was as follows:[4]

Authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for water, wildfire prevention, and protection of communities and lands. Requires annual audits.[5]

Fiscal impact

The fiscal impact statement was as follows:[4]

Increased state costs of about $400 million annually for 40 years to repay the bond.[5]

Full text

The full text of the ballot measure is below:[2]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The attorney general wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 12, and the FRE is 24. The word count for the ballot title is 19.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 14, and the FRE is 10. The word count for the ballot summary is 19.


Support

Yes on 4.jpeg

Yes on 4 led the campaign in support of Proposition 4.[6]

Supporters

A full list of endorsements can be found here.

Officials

Political Parties

Unions

Organizations

  • ACLU of Southern California
  • California Council of Land Trusts
  • California Fire Chiefs Association
  • Clean Water Action
  • Environmental Defense Fund
  • League of Women Voters of California
  • Natural Resources Defense Council
  • The Nature Conservancy
  • The Trust for Public Land


Arguments

  • Ariana Rickard, the public policy and funding program manager for Sonoma Land Trust: "Every Californian has felt the impact of the climate crisis, whether it is wildfires, extreme heat, flooding, sea level rise. I feel like this will resonate with voters who want to protect themselves and their communities."
  • Katelyn Roedner Sutter, state director of the California Environmental Defense Fund: "We need to be not only helping communities adapt to climate change right now, but we also need to be reducing our climate pollution. This is not a problem that can wait until it's convenient to fund in the budget."
  • Horacio Amezquita, serves on the Community Water Center Board of Directors: "It would fund grants and loans to local water agencies to help them provide safe and reliable drinking water. It would fund projects to reduce or treat contaminants in groundwater, to recharge aquifers, to build infrastructure to access clean water, to expand services to communities now poorly served, to protect and restore our rivers, lakes and streams."


Opposition

Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure.

Opponents

Organizations

Arguments

  • State Sen. Brian Jones (R-40): "Before approving more borrowed money, voters deserve to see results from previous investments. Bonds come with long-term financial burdens that eventually can cut into essential public services. Gov. Gavin Newsom has already declared a budget emergency due to the state’s spending outpacing revenue. California also faces a $56 billion deficit, and the addition of Prop. 4’s bond debt would only worsen the situation."
  • Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association: "This is the $10 billion 'climate bond' that state politicians have long planned. California already has too much bond debt, over $78 billion outstanding as of January 1. Then $6.38 billion was added with Proposition 1 in March. Proposition 4 would add another $10 billion in bond debt to pay for climate “programs.” It’s reckless to use borrowed money, an estimated $18 billion with interest, to pay for 'programs,' including salaries for all the groups that receive the money. Bond financing only makes sense for necessary projects that will last more than the 30 years it takes to repay the debt. The governor has already declared a budget emergency because the state spends more than it takes in. Spending even more 'on the credit card' is a bad idea. VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION 4."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for California ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through December 31, 2024.


Four committees registered to support Proposition 4, and none registered to oppose the measure.[7]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $11,331,296.01 $409,622.62 $11,740,918.63 $10,650,467.87 $11,060,090.49
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $11,331,296.01 $409,622.62 $11,740,918.63 $10,650,467.87 $11,060,090.49

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of the measure.Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many

Committees in support of Proposition 4
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Yes on Prop 4, Californians for Safe Drinking Water and Wildfire Prevention $9,510,596.00 $392,074.09 $9,902,670.09 $9,267,250.01 $9,659,324.10
Yes on Props 2 and 4, Sponsored by Nextgen California Action $1,700,000.00 $0.00 $1,700,000.00 $1,313,500.23 $1,313,500.23
Committee for Clean Water, Natural Resources, and Parks - Yes on Proposition 4 $93,700.00 $17,548.53 $111,248.53 $66,639.38 $84,187.91
Committee to Stop Big Oil, Yes on Prop 4 $27,000.01 $0.00 $27,000.01 $3,078.25 $3,078.25
Total $11,331,296.01 $409,622.62 $11,740,918.63 $10,650,467.87 $11,060,090.49

Donors

The following were the top donors who contributed to the support committees.Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
The Nature Conservancy $2,000,000.00 $8,878.79 $2,008,878.79
Kat Taylor $1,700,000.00 $0.00 $1,700,000.00
California Council of Land Trusts Action Fund $1,500,000.00 $0.00 $1,500,000.00
The Trust for Public Land $1,175,000.00 $0.00 $1,175,000.00
Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria $1,000,000.00 $0.00 $1,000,000.00

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Media editorials

See also: 2024 ballot measure media endorsements

Support

The following media editorial boards published an editorial supporting the ballot measure:

  • Bay Area Reporter Editorial Board: "Prop 4 prioritizes projects benefiting disadvantaged communities. It appropriates money from the state general fund to repay the bonds. This measure is a sensible attempt to mitigate climate effects and protect communities. Vote YES on Prop 4."
  • The Bakersfield Californian Editorial Board: "Two large bond measures will appear on California’s Nov. 5 statewide ballot. One proposes to fund long-delayed school improvements and the other responds to the consequences—such as massive wildfires, floods and droughts—of our changing climate. Both deserve voters’ support."
  • San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board: "We can’t allow bureaucracy and infighting to derail urgently needed solutions to the climate crisis. Voters should approve Prop 4 — and state and local officials should take pains to demonstrate that they’ve learned their lesson from the Los Vaqueros fiasco."


Opposition

The following media editorial boards published an editorial opposing the ballot measure:

  • Mercury News & East Bay Times Editorial Board: "Proposition 4 on California’s November ballot calls for borrowing $10 billion to fund scores of environmental proposals that unfortunately are more the product of politics than good policy. Voters should reject the measure. After this year’s state budget debacle, elected leaders should not be eyeing new bonds and more debt for an unfocused spending plan."
  • The San Diego Union-Tribune Editorial Board: "The rule of thumb is that such borrowing normally doubles the long-term cost to taxpayers. So a vote for Proposition 4 is a vote to commit the state to spending about $20 billion at a time when the state faces massive deficits for years to come due to the spending binge that Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature went on before revenue cratered. ... An argument can be made that passing a deeply flawed measure responding to the climate crisis is better than rejecting it. But buying that argument requires a degree of trust in state leaders that they have shown they no longer deserve. It is a close call, but we recommend a 'no' vote on Proposition 4."


Polls

See also: 2024 ballot measure polls
Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
California Proposition 4, Parks, Environment, Energy, and Water Bond Measure (2024)
Poll
Dates
Sample size
Margin of error
Support
Oppose
Undecided
Public Policy Institute of California 10/07/2024 - 10/15/2024 1,137 LV ± 3.1% 60.0% 38.0% 2.0%
Question: "Proposition 4 is called “Authorizes Bonds for Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, and Protecting Communities and Natural Lands From Climate Risks.” Legislative Statute. Authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for water, wildfire prevention, and protection of communities and lands. Requires annual audits. The fiscal impact is increased state costs of about $400 million annually for 40 years to repay the bond. Supporters include Clean Water Action; CAL FIRE Firefighters; National Wildlife Federation; The Nature Conservancy. Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"
Public Policy Institute of California 8/29/2024 - 09/11/2024 1,071 LV ± 3.7% 65.0% 33.0% 2.0%
Question: "Proposition 4 is called “Authorizes Bonds for Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, and Protecting Communities and Natural Lands From Climate Risks”. Legislative Statute. Authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for water, wildfire prevention, and protection of communities and lands. Requires annual audits. The fiscal impact is increased state costs of about $400 million annually for 40 years to repay the bond. Supporters include Clean Water Action; CALFIRE Firefighters; National Wildlife Federation; The Nature Conservancy. Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Background

Bond issues on the ballot in California

See also: Bond issues on the ballot

Californians cast ballots on 46 bond issues, totaling $200.536 billion in value, from January 1, 1993, through March 5, 2024. Voters approved 34 (74%) of the bond measures—a total of $163.054 billion. Nine of the measures were citizen initiatives, and six of the nine citizen-initiated bonds were approved. The legislature referred 37 bond measures to the ballot, and 28 of 37 legislative referrals were approved. The most common purposes of a bond measure between 1993 and 2024 were water infrastructure and housing, for which there were nine bond measures each.

Click show to expand the bond revenue table.

Bond debt in California

The Legislative Analyst's Office reported that California was repaying an estimated $80 billion in bonded debt and was authorized to sell an outstanding $35 billion in bonds. The state spends approximately $6 billion from the General Fund (3% of the total fund) each year to repay bonds.[8]

Path to the ballot

See also: Legislatively referred bond measures in California

A two-thirds (66.67%) vote is required during one legislative session for the California State Legislature to place a legislatively referred bond measure on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 54 votes in the California State Assembly and 27 votes in the California State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Bond measures do require the governor's signature.

This bond measure was introduced as Senate Bill 867 (SB 867) on February 17, 2023. It passed the Senate on May 31, 2023, by a vote of 33-5 with two absent. The state Assembly passed the measure on July 3, 2024, by a vote of 66-6.[1]

Vote in the California State Senate
May 31, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 27  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3352
Total percent82.5%12.5%5.0%
Democrat3200
Republican152

Vote in the California House of Representatives
July 3, 2024
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 54  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total6667
Total percent83.5%7.6%8.9%
Democrat6011
Republican656

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in California

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in California.

How to vote in California


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 California State Legislature, "Senate Bill 867," accessed June 1, 2023
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 California State Legislature, "Senate Bill 867," accessed June 1, 2023
  3. Legislative Analyst's Office, "Proposition 4," accessed July 23, 2024
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 California Secretary of State, "Qualified Measures," accessed September 13, 2024
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  6. Yes on 4, "Home," accessed October 1, 2024
  7. Cal-Access, "Proposition 4," accessed July 22, 2024
  8. Legislative Analyst's Office, "Overview of State Bond Debt," accessed July 24, 2024
  9. California Secretary of State, "Section 3: Polling Place Hours," accessed August 12, 2024
  10. California Secretary of State, "Voter Registration," accessed August 13, 2024
  11. 11.0 11.1 California Secretary of State, "Registering to Vote," accessed August 13, 2024
  12. California Secretary of State, "Same Day Voter Registration (Conditional Voter Registration)," accessed August 13, 2024
  13. SF.gov, "Non-citizen voting rights in local Board of Education elections," accessed November 14, 2024
  14. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  15. California Secretary of State, "What to Bring to Your Polling Place," accessed August 12, 2024
  16. BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, "Section 20107," accessed August 12, 2024
  17. Democracy Docket, "California Governor Signs Law to Ban Local Voter ID Requirements," September 30, 2024