California Proposition 5, Legislative Pay Amendment (1942)
| California Proposition 5 | |
|---|---|
| Election date November 3, 1942 | |
| Topic Salaries of government officials | |
| Status | |
| Type Constitutional amendment | Origin State legislature |
California Proposition 5 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on November 3, 1942. It was defeated.
A “yes” vote supported setting the pay for legislative members at $200 per month and fixing the rate for mileage reimbursement at a maximum of $0.05 per mile. |
A “no” vote opposed setting the pay for legislative members at $200 per month and fixing the rate for mileage reimbursement at a maximum of $0.05 per mile. |
Election results
|
California Proposition 5 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 531,931 | 35.63% | ||
| 961,023 | 64.37% | |||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 5 was as follows:
| “ | Compensation of Legislative Members Increased. Mileage Maximum Fixed | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
| “ | Assembly Constitutional Amendment 2. Amends Constitution, Article IV, section 23. Legislative members to receive $200 each for each month of term for which elected. payable monthly in even numbered years, and during regular legislative session in odd-numbered years as may be provided by law; and mileage to be fixed by law not to exceed five cents per mile. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the California Constitution
A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
State of California Sacramento (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |