Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
California Proposition 69, Required Collection of Felon DNA Samples Initiative (2004)
| California Proposition 69 | |
|---|---|
| Election date November 2, 2004 | |
| Topic Law enforcement | |
| Status | |
| Type State statute | Origin Citizens |
California Proposition 69 was on the ballot as an initiated state statute in California on November 2, 2004. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported requiring that DNA be collected from persons convicted of felonies and submitted to a state database. |
A "no" vote opposed requiring that DNA be collected from persons convicted of felonies and submitted to a state database. |
Election results
|
California Proposition 69 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 7,194,343 | 62.05% | |||
| No | 4,400,826 | 37.95% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 69 was as follows:
| “ | DNA Samples. Collection. Database. Funding. Initiative Statute. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
| “ |
| ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Fiscal impact statement
The fiscal impact statement was as follows:
| “ |
|
” |
Path to the ballot
In California, the number of signatures required for an initiated state statute is equal to 5 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election. For initiated statutes filed in 2004, at least 373,816 valid signatures were required
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
State of California Sacramento (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |