California Proposition 7, State Board of Chiropractic Examiners Measure (1960)
California Proposition 7 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date November 8, 1960 | |
Topic Administration of government | |
Status![]() | |
Type State statute | Origin State legislature |
California Proposition 7 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred state statute in California on November 8, 1960. It was approved.
A “yes” vote supported allowing two members of the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to be from the same school and allowing the legislature to fix the fees for applicants and licensees and the per diem day of board members. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing two members of the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to be from the same school and allowing the legislature to fix the fees for applicants and licensees and the per diem day of board members. |
Election results
California Proposition 7 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
2,834,810 | 56.33% | |||
No | 2,197,462 | 43.67% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 7 was as follows:
“ | Chiropractors | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
“ | Amendment To Chiropractic Initiative Act, Submitted By Legislature. Permits two, rather than one, board members from same chiropractic school or college to be members of board at same time. Provides that Legislature may fix fees of applicants and licensees and per diem compensation payable to board members. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
A simple majority vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the measure to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |