California Proposition 8, Superior Court Vacancies Amendment (1948)
California Proposition 8 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date November 2, 1948 | |
Topic State judiciary | |
Status![]() | |
Type Constitutional amendment | Origin State legislature |
California Proposition 8 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on November 2, 1948. It was approved.
A “yes” vote supported establishing that Superior Court vacancies during a general election year shall be filled at the next general election. |
A “no” vote opposed establishing that Superior Court vacancies during a general election year shall be filled at the next general election. |
Election results
California Proposition 8 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
2,393,617 | 80.04% | |||
No | 596,780 | 19.96% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 8 was as follows:
“ | Superior Judges, Vacancies | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
“ | Assembly Constitutional Amendment No 11. Amends Section 8 of Article VI of the Constitution. Provides that where Superior Court vacancy occurs at any time during a general election year (instead of after April 1st, as presently provided) election of successor for the full six-year term shall take place in the succeeding general election year. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the California Constitution
A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |