Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

California Proposition 9, Water System Improvements Bond Measure (1980)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
California Proposition 9

Flag of California.png

Election date

November 4, 1980

Topic
Bond issues and Water
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Bond issue
Origin

State legislature



California Proposition 9 was on the ballot as a bond issue in California on November 4, 1980. It was approved.

A “yes” vote supported allowing for the issuance of bonds up to $30,000,000 for the construction or improvement of domestic water systems that have become contaminated by organic or inorganic compounds or radiation and establishing the terms of such bonds.

A “no” vote opposed allowing for the issuance of bonds up to $30,000,000 for the construction or improvement of domestic water systems that have become contaminated by organic or inorganic compounds or radiation and establishing the terms of such bonds.


Election results

California Proposition 9

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

4,857,006 64.39%
No 2,686,329 35.61%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 9 was as follows:

California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1976

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

CALIFORNIA SAFE DRINKING WATER BOND LAW OF 1976. LEGISLATIVE STATUTORY AMENDMENT. Amends California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1976 by authorizing Legislature to increase from $15,000,000 to $30,000,000 the amount of previously authorized bond proceeds that may be used for grants to political subdivisions, owning or operating domestic water systems, upon determination that such subdivisions are otherwise unable to meet minimum safe drinking water standards. Provides that up to $15,000,000 of the $30,000,000 may be used for grants for construction, improvement, or rehabilitation of domestic water systems which have become contaminated by organic or inorganic compounds, or radiation. Fiscal impact on state or local governments: Revenue loss to State General Fund of $36 million (in principal plus interest) over a 30-year period.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Path to the ballot

A simple majority vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the measure to the ballot for voter consideration.

See also


External links

Footnotes