Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

California Proposition 93, Residency Requirement for the Veterans' Tax Exemption Amendment (1988)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
California Proposition 93

Flag of California.png

Election date

November 8, 1988

Topic
Taxes and Veterans policy
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Legislatively referred constitutional amendment
Origin

State legislature



California Proposition 93 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on November 8, 1988. It was approved.

A “yes” vote supported removing the residency requirement for receiving the veterans' property tax exemption.

A “no” vote opposed removing the residency requirement for receiving the veterans' property tax exemption.


Election results

California Proposition 93

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

6,273,718 70.83%
No 2,583,966 29.17%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 93 was as follows:

Veteran's Property Tax Exemption.

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

VETERANS' PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Under existing law, the State Constitution exempts up to $1,000 of the assessed value of real property from the property tax if the owner is an honorably discharged member of the armed forces, or the parent or unmarried spouse of a deceased veteran. This measure deletes the additional requirement that the veteran must have been a California resident upon entry into the armed forces or on November 3, 1964. Summary of Legislative Analyst's estimate of net state and local government fiscal impact: Beginning in 1989-90, this amendment would reduce property tax collections. The revenue loss probably would be less than $50,000 per year. Cities, counties and special districts would bear approximately 60 percent of the loss. The remainder would affect school districts and community college districts. Existing law would require the State General Fund to offset the losses to the schools and the colleges, beginning in 1989-90.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the California Constitution

A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.

See also


External links

Footnotes