Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
California Proposition 94, Judges as Part-Time Teachers Amendment (1988)
California Proposition 94 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Education and State judiciary |
|
Status |
|
Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
California Proposition 94 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in California on November 8, 1988. It was approved.
A “yes” vote supported allowing judges to serve as part-time teachers. |
A “no” vote opposed allowing judges to serve as part-time teachers. |
Election results
California Proposition 94 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
5,719,900 | 65.13% | |||
No | 3,062,872 | 34.87% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 94 was as follows:
“ | Judges. Legislative Constitutional Amendment. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
“ | Permits judges of courts of record to accept part-time teaching positions that are outside the normal hours of their judicial position and do not interfere with the regular performance of their judicial duties. Prohibits judicial officer from earning retirement service credit from a public teaching position while holding judicial office. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the California Constitution
A two-thirds vote was needed in each chamber of the California State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |