Carpinteria Unified School District bond proposition, Measure U (November 2014)
Bond elections |
---|
2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
Property tax elections |
2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 2010 • 2009 • 2008 All years and states |
See also |
State comparisons How voting works Approval rates |
A Carpinteria Unified School District bond proposition, Measure U ballot question was on the November 4, 2014 election ballot for voters in the Carpinteria Unified School District in Santa Barbara County, California. It was approved.
Measure U authorized the district to increase its debt by $90 million through issuing general obligation bonds in that amount.[1]
A 55 percent supermajority vote was required for the approval of Measure U.
Election results
Carpinteria Unified School District, Measure U | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
![]() | 3,901 | 66.33% | ||
No | 1,980 | 33.67% |
Election results via: Santa Barbara County Elections Office
Text of measure
Ballot question
The question on the ballot:[1]
“ |
Carpinteria Unified School District Repair, Safety and College/Career Readiness Measure. To improve schools, attract and retain quality teachers, and prepare students for college and careers by repairing deteriorating classrooms, bathrooms/leaky roofs, removing asbestos and lead paint, upgrading electrical wiring and classroom technology, repairing, constructing, acquiring educational facilities, sites/equipment, shall Carpinteria Unified School District issue $90,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, requiring annual independent audits, citizens’ oversight, no money for administrators’ salaries or pensions, and all funds used locally?[2] |
” |
Project list
The full text of the proposed bond measure included these excerpts from the project list:[1]
“ |
Renovation, Repair and Upgrade Projects
Student Safety
Energy Efficiency – Returning Savings to the Classroom
Instructional Technology and Wiring Projects
|
” |
Support
Supporters
The following individuals signed and submitted arguments in favor of Measure U:[1]
- Martha L. Hickey, Business Owner
- Beth Cox, CUSD parent
- Marybeth Carty, Community Partnership
- John Franklin, retired banker and community member
- Winfred VanWingerden
Arguments in favor
The following arguments were submitted in favor of Measure U and in response to arguments against the tax:[1]
“ |
The sole opponent of Measure U is misleading voters with inaccurate, untruthful statements. As longtime Carpinteria residents, leaders, and community members - we know the facts, and we're voting YES on Measure U. Good schools strengthen property values and our local economy. Measure U was placed on the ballot after extensive research into each school, resulting in a detailed facilities master plan. Visit www.cusd.net to see the assessed needs and detailed plan to provide safe schools and quality instruction to prepare out students for college and careers. Portable classrooms - some installed over 35 years ago - are outdated and in need of permanent replacement. Additionally, many of our original school buildings desperately need repair. Our schools are aging, and while nearby communities have ballot measures every few years, it's been almost 20 years since we passed a bond to upgrade Carpinteria schools. The longer we wait for needed repairs and upgrades, the more expensive they will be. Measure U can only be used for facilities, NOT administrators' salaries. Measure U will fund science, design and engineering, library, and technology facilities and fix leaky roofs, unsafe buildings and other basic infrastructure needs. Updated facilities will allow us to retain quality teachers, and prepare students for a bright future. All funds must stay local and cannot be taken away by the State. An independent citizens' oversight committee and mandatory performance and financial audits are required to ensure taxpayer protections. Join us! Please Vote YES on Measure U to protect Carpinteria schools. (quote) |
” |
—Martha L. Hickey, Beth Cox, Marybeth Carty, John Franklin, Winfred VanWingerden[1] |
Opposition
Opponents
Bernard L. Fink submitted arguments in opposition to Measure U and in response to arguments in favor of the tax.[1]
Arguments against
Opponents argued that the bond issue is not the best use of taxpayer money and does not improve the education provided by the district in the most important ways. Critics also noted that the ballot question mentions the goal "to attract and retain quality teachers," which would be more efficiently achieved by a salary increase - not an allowed use of bond money according to Measure U restrictions - than the improvement of classrooms and school facilities.[1]
The following arguments were submitted in opposition to Measure U and in response to arguments supporting the tax:[1]
“ |
it is remarkable that 63 individual buildings should all fail at once. School upgrades should be limited to individual projects, as needed, that the public can monitor and understand. Quality classrooms make only a minor contribution towards retaining competent teachers. The important thing is salary, which this bond issue does not address. (quote) |
” |
—Bernard L. Fink[1] |
See also
- Local school bonds on the ballot
- School bond elections in California
- Santa Barbara County, California ballot measures
- November 4, 2014 ballot measures in California
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |