Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Cathy Cochran

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Cathy Cochran

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Place 9

Education

Bachelor's

Stanford University, 1966

Law

University of Houston, 1984


Cathy Cochran was a judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. She was appointed by Governor Rick Perry in 2001 and retained by voters in 2002 and 2008.[1][2] Cochran retired at the end of her term in 2014.[3]

Education

Cochran earned her B.A. in English in 1966 from Stanford University and in 1984, her J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center.[4]

Career

Cochran has worked in the private practice of law, served as an assistant district attorney in Texas counties and lectured as an adjunct professor at her alma mater. She has also serve as the director of criminal justice in the policy office of former Governor George W. Bush.[4]

Awards and associations

  • Member, Administration of Rules of Evidence Committee of the State Bar
  • Member, State Bar College[4]

Elections

2008

Cochran was re-elected to the court in 2008.[2]

Candidate IncumbentSeatPartyElection %
Supreme-Court-Elections-badge.png
Cathy Cochran ApprovedA YesPlace 9Republican81.8%
William Bryan Strange NoPlace 9Libertarian18.1%


Political ideology

See also: Political ideology of State Supreme Court Justices

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Cochran received a campaign finance score of -0.68, indicating a liberal ideological leaning. This was more liberal than the average score of 0.91 that justices received in Texas.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[5]

See also

External links

Footnotes