Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Catia Sharp
Catia Sharp (Democratic Party) ran for election to the Massachusetts House of Representatives to represent the 27th Middlesex District. She lost in the Democratic primary on September 1, 2020.
Sharp completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. Click here to read the survey answers.
Biography
Sharp was born in Burlington, Vermont. She earned her bachelor's degree from Northeastern University in 2013 and her master's degree from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government in 2018. Her professional experience includes working as a coordinator of Smart Justice Initiatives and as a behavioral health policy analyst at the Massachusetts Association for Mental Health and Middlesex Sheriff's Office. She has also worked at designing mental health and substance use programs, as an economic and fiscal analyst for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office for Administration and Finance, as a government innovation fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School Government Performance Lab, as intake staff for MetroWest Legal Services, as well as an event assistant for the National Alliance on Mental Illness of Massachusetts (NAMI-Mass).[1]
Elections
2020
See also: Massachusetts House of Representatives elections, 2020
General election
General election for Massachusetts House of Representatives 27th Middlesex District
Erika Uyterhoeven won election in the general election for Massachusetts House of Representatives 27th Middlesex District on November 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Erika Uyterhoeven (D) ![]() | 98.4 | 20,549 |
Other/Write-in votes | 1.6 | 328 |
Total votes: 20,877 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for Massachusetts House of Representatives 27th Middlesex District
Erika Uyterhoeven defeated Catia Sharp in the Democratic primary for Massachusetts House of Representatives 27th Middlesex District on September 1, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Erika Uyterhoeven ![]() | 61.9 | 8,943 |
![]() | Catia Sharp ![]() | 38.1 | 5,494 |
Total votes: 14,437 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Endorsements
To see a list of endorsements for Catia Sharp, click here.
Campaign themes
2020
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Catia Sharp completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Sharp's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Collapse all
|- We need government that puts people first and addresses the root causes of problems
- Catia believes in equity and justice for all, not only those who are born with access and opportunity
- Catia has the experience in government to create more access and opportunity for everyone
I also care deeply about the equity and justice challenges we see in our transportation system, the barriers people face to working (childcare affordability, etc.), climate and environmental stewardship, and even in our tax code.
I admire Angela Merkel and Jacinda Ardern for their bold and unapologetic leadership of their respective countries. Neither of them has bent to meet the mold of male leadership that came before, and instead have shown a new model of leadership that is humble, compassionate, and bold. I hope to also model a feminine style of leadership that can drop confrontational and ego-centric parts of leadership in favor of intellectual curiosity and honesty.
I admire Taran Burke, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Fannie Lou Hamer, Malala Yousafzai, and Rachel Carson for their ability to develop a theory of what the world should look like and to pursue that theory when it's tough, and when no one else agrees with you. These women showed us the problematic parts of our society, and proposed new ways of thinking and of treating each other and our environment that live on today. They weren't apologetic or afraid to put forward those visions, and in many ways were not accepted for those visions. But they pushed the arc of history forward nevertheless.
For this reason, I think elected officials must be deliberative, which is not to say they should be indecisive. Elected officials must be willing to make bold choices when called for, and do so knowing all of the downsides.
A State Representative must actively work with residents, stakeholder groups, and others to identify challenges that can be remedied through one of the three functions described above.
Though I have no other life or time to compare it to, my life feels like it has been traveling through an extraordinary, once in several generations time period. I entered adulthood the year of the global financial crisis, and entered the workforce in the aftermath Great Recession. Now, I am transitioning into my thirties and the next phase of my career and adult life during a global pandemic that threatens an even deeper recession. And those global recessions come after the tumult of the terror attacks and the wars (and racism) that followed.
Every generation is a product of the historical events that they live through. I think my generation is rightly questioning the pre-existing world order (capitalism, neoliberalism, and a general bias toward the status quo) specifically because that world order has never felt safe or pre-ordained to us. We may still fall across a range of ideological beliefs that color our ultimate reaction to these events, but on both sides of the ideological spectrum, people are questioning the style of those who came before.
I started working there as a cooperative education student from Northeastern University in 2012, and stayed into the Baker administration before leaving in 2015 after seeing some decision making that I didn't agree with.
This job was incredibly foundational for me. The people who I worked with, including the Secretary of Administration and Finance at the time Jay Gonzales (who later ran for governor himself), were the most passionate, dedicated group of public servants I have ever had the pleasure of working with. Every decision that was made involved a discussion about how it would impact the people who depend on or benefit from the government program in question. Dissenting opinions were sought out and their feedback incorporated; even when I was a cooperative education student, my feedback was sought and implemented when appropriate.
My family is lucky that my dad got the care he needed, and my parents were able to rebuild their lives after that. Many people aren't as lucky, suffering from the kind of poor health and chronic conditions you can have when you don't get good primary care due to a lack of insurance.
Because of the difference in the number of members, and the way we have structured committees in our legislature (Joint Committees between House and Senate), every single member of the Senate is in leadership on a committee. That is not true in the House. Senators have more resources than Representatives, and the position therefore is more prestigious and attracts good talent. Representatives who aren't in leadership - the majority of them - must make decisions on hundreds of bills each year and handle all of the constituent inquiries in their district of 40,000 residents with only a single paid (and I should say underpaid) staffer.
There is also a deep cultural divide between the two chambers that likely stems from these logistical differences. There is a much more top-down, bureaucratic internal infrastructure in the House of Representatives that makes it harder for a single representative to drive the narrative on a given topic. There is also a history of corruption and nepotism that has sent prior Speakers of the House to jail.
I started a masters degree at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government in the fall of 2016, and two months later, Donald Trump was elected president. I feel intensely the same pain and frustration of many in my generation that is seeking a change from established ways that the world works that seem to only be sowing chaos and confusion in our time. However, it terrified me that the response to these feelings could be electing a person with no experience to the most important office. That planted the first seed of seeking office myself some day.
I have spent my entire career in government, and have seen first hand how the implementation of programs and policies is almost more important than the existence of those policies and programs in the first place. The Republican governor in Florida knows this well, and has purposefully undermined their unemployment insurance system so that it is basically non-functional.
Massachusetts is facing a crisis of affordability in housing. Rents and home prices are sky-high and growing at unprecedented rates. Property values are following the trend, meaning many people in Somerville are house-rich, but cash-poor, and struggle to pay property taxes. This situation impacts everyone, regardless of income. Low-income families and renters struggle with the high rental costs and ever-increasing rents. Would-be American dreamers seeking to purchase a first home struggle to enter the intensely competitive market.
Our transportation infrastructure is crumbling, and we have ignored the problem rather than face it head-on for decades. Subway, commuter rail, and bus service are compromised by decades of under-investment in regular maintenance and desperately needed upgrades that would, for example, allow for trains to travel faster or become more energy efficient. Bus service is not aligned with the needs of residents. Walking and biking are incredibly unsafe, and a review of the nation's traffic patterns named the Boston area as one of the worst for rush hour congestion. If we want to sustain an innovative, thriving economy, we need transportation that works for people.
Climate change threatens everyone across the globe, and Massachusetts is no different. With miles of fragile coastline ecosystems, we must act now to mitigate the impacts and prepare to protect people from those that are now inevitable.
The Governor would implement programs and policies with rigor and with measurement of success, and would report the data to the legislature to start a conversation about what is working, what isn't working, and how to improve.
Changing the people at the table and who and what they represent is certainly part of progress. Representation is important. It is also true that people are flawed; no single person represents perfection, because perfection is in the eye of the beholder.
Because each individual sees things just a little bit differently, it will always be true that legislators must build relationships with people they may agree with one day and disagree with the next day. We must be able and willing to have conversations across difference, to continue to respect each other and to treat each other as such, and to be willing to work with someone through the differences.
I would also be interested in the House Committee on Post Audit and Oversight, given my knowledge of the administrative side of government and interest in accountability and performance management.
Our State Senator, Pat Jehlen, is also a model of leadership on issues like criminal justice reform, education, senior issues, and more who I would seek to model as well.
This young man said that when he was released, he would need to go back to that house on that unsafe block because he had nowhere else to go, and no money or job with income to find and rent his own place outside of that neighborhood. When he returns, he will need to carry a weapon to protect himself, just like he did before. That puts him at risk of getting arrested again, but it also makes him feel safer.
This predicament explains our criminal justice system to me. The root cause of the incarceration of so many people is actually a rift in the fabric of our social system. A lack of access to opportunity - whether that is high-quality education, good jobs, affordable rent, accessible transportation, mental health services, etc. - puts people in positions where they must make choices between terrible options. Then, we punish them for their circumstances, and further restrict their access to opportunity by locking them up. Inside a jail or prison, you can't secure income, secure housing, or secure any of those basic needs for your future. Your time has stopped. Jails and prisons also place so much stress and anxiety on a person that they deteriorate your mental health and make it harder for you to concentrate on achieving these higher goals, as opposed to focusing on your immediate safety and basic needs.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
See also
2020 Elections
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on May 11, 2020.