Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Chicago, Illinois, Firearm Bump Stock Ban Advisory Question (March 2018)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Local ballot measure elections in 2018
Chicago, Illinois, Firearm Bump Stock Ban Advisory Question
LocalBallotMeasures Final.png
The basics
Election date:
March 20, 2018
Status:
Approveda Approved
Topic:
Local firearms
Related articles
Local firearms on the ballot
March 20, 2018 ballot measures in Illinois
Cook County, Illinois ballot measures
See also
Chicago, Illinois

A bump stock ban advisory question was on the ballot for voters in Chicago, Illinois, on March 20, 2018. It was approved.

A yes vote was a vote in favor of advising Gov. Bruce Rauner (R) to support legislation to ban bump stocks for guns and increase penalties for those who sell guns illegally.
A no vote was a vote against advising Gov. Bruce Rauner (R) to support legislation to ban bump stocks for guns and increase penalties for those who sell guns illegally.

The advisory question was designed to determine the level of support from voters in the city of Chicago for a ban on bump stocks for guns and increased penalties for those who sell guns illegally. The question was non-binding, meaning that approval did not directly ban bump stocks.

Election results

Chicago, Illinois, Firearm Bump Stock Ban Advisory Question (March 2018)

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

412,772 91.95%
No 36,153 8.05%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot question

The ballot question was as follows:[1]

Should Governor Rauner support Illinois legislation to ban firearm bump stocks and strengthen penalties on illegal gun traffickers? [2]

Path to the ballot

This question was put on the ballot by the Chicago City Council.[1]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 NBC Chicago, "These Are the Referendum Questions on Chicago Voters' Ballots," March 8, 2018
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.