Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Chicago, Illinois, Firearms Measure (November 2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local ballot measure elections in 2016

Firearms Measure: Chicago
LocalBallotMeasures Final.png
The basics
Election date:
November 8, 2016
Status:
Approveda Approved
Topic:
Local firearms
Related articles
Local firearms on the ballot
November 8, 2016 ballot measures in Illinois
Cook County, Illinois ballot measures
Local advisory vote on the ballot
See also
Chicago, Illinois

A firearms measure was on the ballot for Chicago voters in Cook County, Illinois, on November 8, 2016. It was approved.

A yes vote was a vote in favor of strengthening penalties for the illegal trafficking of firearms and requiring background checks for gun dealers and their employees in Illinois.
A no vote was a vote against strengthening penalties for the illegal trafficking of firearms and requiring background checks for gun dealers and their employees in Illinois.

Election results

Firearms Measure
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 943,282 92.58%
No75,6037.42%
Election results from Chicago Board of Election Commissioners

Text of measure

Ballot question

The following question appeared on the ballot:[1]

Should the State of Illinois strengthen penalties for the illegal trafficking of firearms and require background checks for gun dealers and their employees?[2]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in Illinois

This measure was put on the ballot through a successful initiative petition campaign.

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Chicago Local firearms. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. City of Chicago, "2016 General Election Sample Ballot," accessed October 21, 2016
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.