Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Christine Donohue
2016 - Present
2026
9
Christine Donohue (Democratic Party) is a judge of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. She assumed office on January 8, 2016. Her current term ends on January 4, 2026.
Donohue (Democratic Party) is running for re-election for judge of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. She is on the ballot in the retention election on November 4, 2025.[source]
Donohue first became a member of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court through a partisan election. She was first elected to the court in 2015. To read more about judicial elections in Pennsylvania, click here.
In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country. As part of this study, we assigned each justice a Confidence Score describing our confidence in the degree of partisanship exhibited by the justices' past partisan behavior, before they joined the court.[1] Donohue received a confidence score of Strong Democrat.[2] Click here to read more about this study.
Biography
Christine Donohue received a B.A. in political science from East Stroudsburg University in 1974 and a J.D. from Duquesne University School of Law in 1980.[3] Prior to her service on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, she was a judge on the Pennsylvania Superior Court from 2008 to 2015. From 1989 to 2007, she was a shareholder with Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C. and worked as a private practice attorney from 1980 to 1989.[3]
2025 battleground election
Ballotpedia identified the November 4 general election as a battleground race. The summary below is from our coverage of this election here
Three Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices — Christine Donohue (D), Kevin M. Dougherty (D), and David N. Wecht (D) — are up for retention elections on November 4, 2025.
WHYY's Carmen Russell-Sluchansky wrote, "State judicial elections typically garner little attention, but Pennsylvania’s 2025 state Supreme Court races are shaping up to be the next major political battleground."[4]
The state court has a 5-2 Democratic majority.[5] The court has been Democratic-controlled since 2015, when Donohue, Dougherty, and Wecht won election to their seats.[6] If voters do not retain a justice, Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) with approval from two-thirds of the Republican-controlled Pennsylvania Senate, can appoint a temporary replacement until 2027, when an election would be held for a permanent replacement.[7][8][9] Additionally, if all three justices are not retained and the Senate does not approve Shapiro's nominees, the court would be split with two liberals and two conservatives, which The Philadelphia Inquirer's Gillian McGoldrick wrote could leave the court "unlikely to reach majority decisions and could weaken the voice of Pennsylvania’s top court going into the 2028 presidential election, when the swing state could decide the next president yet again."[10]
Pennsylvania uses partisan elections to select a justice for an initial 10-year term, and uses a retention election to determine whether to keep them. If a justice is retained, they will serve another 10-year term. Pennsylvania is one of eight states to use partisan elections for the initial selection of a justice and one of 22 to use retention elections for the renewal of a term.
According to Pennsylvania's Code of Judicial Conduct, justices are limited in their ability to campaign.[8] Both the Democratic and Republican parties have said they would be involved in this race. The Republican State Leadership Committee has run ads on social media, asking voters to vote against retaining the justices, which said, "In 2024, we voted by mail and flipped Pennsylvania red. This year, radical liberal judges are trying to secure another decade of power. We need you to stop them, show up again, vote 'no' in November."[11] As of August 2025, there was no reporting on Democratic efforts. The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee said in February 2025 that they intended to invest in the state, writing in a statement, "We must preserve fair majorities to ensure state legislative races are run on fair maps and to protect the future of abortion access, voting rights, workers' rights, and so much more."[12]
Since retention elections were established in 1968, only one Pennsylvania justice, Russell Nigro (D) in 2005, has not been retained.[13] Since 2020, in 102 elections, 100 justices (98%) have won retention. The most recent justice in the U.S. to not win retention was Yvonne Kauger in Oklahoma in 2024.
Elections
2025
See also: Pennsylvania Supreme Court elections, 2025
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Seat 2 - Christine Donohue
Christine Donohue is running for retention to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on November 4, 2025.
Retention Vote |
% |
Votes |
|||
Yes |
|||||
No |
|||||
Total Votes |
|
Endorsements
Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.
2015
- See also: Pennsylvania judicial elections, 2015
Pennsylvania's judicial elections included a primary on May 19, 2015, and a general election on November 3, 2015. The filing deadline for candidates was March 11, 2015.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Three seats, General Election, 2015 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Democratic | ![]() |
18.5% | 1,079,835 | |
Democratic | ![]() |
18.4% | 1,070,568 | |
Democratic | ![]() |
18.2% | 1,059,167 | |
Republican | Judith Olson | 15.2% | 887,409 | |
Republican | Michael A. George | 13.6% | 796,124 | |
Republican | Anne Covey | 13.6% | 795,330 | |
Independent Judicial Alliance | Paul P. Panepinto | 2.5% | 144,403 | |
Write-in votes | 0% | 0 | ||
Total Votes | 5,832,836 | |||
Source: Pennsylvania Department of State, "Unofficial General Election Results," November 3, 2015 |
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Three seats, Democratic Primary, 2015 | ||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes |
![]() |
22.1% | 256,761 |
![]() |
22.0% | 256,048 |
![]() |
21.4% | 248,325 |
Anne Lazarus | 16.3% | 189,127 |
Dwayne D. Woodruff | 11.7% | 136,127 |
John H. Foradora | 6.6% | 76,190 |
Write-in votes | 0% | 0 |
Total Votes | 1,162,578 | |
Source: Pennsylvania Department of State, "2015 Municipal Primary Unofficial Results," May 19, 2015 |
Recommendation
Donohue was highly recommended by the Pennsylvania Bar Association due in part to her "proven record of judicial leadership and ethics and dedication to the legal profession."[14]
Endorsements
- Pennsylvania AFL-CIO
- Pennsylvania Building and Construction Trades Council
- Teamsters Joint Council 40
- Allegheny- Fayette Central Labor Council
- Pittsburgh Regional Building Trades Council
- Westmoreland County Central Labor Council
- Western Pennsylvania Carpenters Regional District Council
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 5 (IBEW Local 5)
- Steamfitters Local Union 449
- Pittsburgh Plumbers Local 27
- International Union of Painters and Allied Trades I.U.P.A.T. District Council 57
- International Union of Operation Engineers I.U.O.E. Local 66
- United Food and Commercial Workers Local 23
- United Mine Workers District 2
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 29 (IBEW Local 29)
- Pennsylvania Federation of Teachers
- Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers
- SEIU Pennsylvania State Council
- Pennsylvania Pipe Trades
- Unite Here Local 57
- Luzerne County Democratic Party
- Schuylkill County Democratic Party
- Gertrude Stein Club of Greater Pittsburgh
- Steel City Stonewall Democrats
- Pittsburgh's 14th Ward Independent Democratic Club[15]
Campaign themes
2025
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Christine Donohue has not yet completed Ballotpedia's 2025 Candidate Connection survey. Send a message to Christine Donohue asking her to fill out the survey. If you are Christine Donohue, click here to fill out Ballotpedia's 2025 Candidate Connection survey.
Who fills out Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey?
Any candidate running for elected office, at any level, can complete Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey. Completing the survey will update the candidate's Ballotpedia profile, letting voters know who they are and what they stand for. More than 22,000 candidates have taken Ballotpedia's candidate survey since we launched it in 2015. Learn more about the survey here.
You can ask Christine Donohue to fill out this survey by using the buttons below or emailing info@donohue2025.com.
2015
Donohue's campaign website listed the following themes for the 2015 election:
“ |
Throughout her career, Judge Donohue has had the opportunity to litigate or preside over landmark cases protecting the rights of injured persons, holding corporations accountable for fraudulent behavior, eliminating bias against LGBT parents in custody matters and more. She has been an adjunct professor at Duquesne University and lectured before legal, professional and student audiences. She has served on or led every ethics enforcement body and tribunal established in Pennsylvania to ensure attorneys and judges comply with the highest standards of conduct. Judge Donohue, who represented individuals, corporations and business people throughout her career as an attorney, earned the title of Pennsylvania Super Lawyer and is listed in Best Lawyers in America. [23] |
” |
—Donohue for Justice (2015)[24] |
Campaign finance summary
Campaign finance information for this candidate is not yet available from OpenSecrets. That information will be published here once it is available.
Analysis
Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship (2020)
Last updated: June 15, 2020
In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country as of June 15, 2020.
The study presented Confidence Scores that represented our confidence in each justice's degree of partisan affiliation. This was not a measure of where a justice fell on an ideological spectrum, but rather a measure of how much confidence we had that a justice was or had been affiliated with a political party. The scores were based on seven factors, including but not limited to party registration.[25]
The five resulting categories of Confidence Scores were:
- Strong Democrat
- Mild Democrat
- Indeterminate[26]
- Mild Republican
- Strong Republican
This justice's Confidence Score, as well as the factors contributing to that score, is presented below. The information below was current as of June 2020.
Christine
Donohue
Pennsylvania
- Partisan Confidence Score:
Strong Democrat - Judicial Selection Method:
Elected - Key Factors:
- Was a registered Democrat as of 2020
- Donated over $2,000 to Democratic candidates
- Received donations from Democrat-affiliated individuals or organizations
Partisan Profile
Details:
Donohue ran as a registered Democrat for the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. She donated $9,325 to Democratic candidates. She received $161,232 from the Pennsylvania Democratic Party. She was endorsed by the Pennsylvania AFL-CIO, the Pennsylvania Building and Construction Trades Council, the Teamsters Joint Council 40, the Allegheny- Fayette Central Labor Council, and the Pittsburgh Regional Building Trades Council, all of which endorse Democrats more frequently than Republicans.
Noteworthy cases
Wolf v. Scarnati (2020)
Wolf v. Scarnati: On July 1, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled against legislative Republicans in favor of Gov. Tom Wolf (D), upholding his ability to maintain COVID-19 shutdown orders. The lawsuit stemmed from Wolf’s March 6, 2020, emergency disaster proclamation, which he renewed on June 3, 2020. On June 9, 2020, the Pennsylvania General Assembly adopted a concurrent resolution, HR836, seeking to terminate the disaster emergency, which was not presented to the governor for approval or veto. The governor did not comply. Three Republican state senators filed a complaint in the Commonwealth Court, asking the court to command Wolf to comply with their resolution by "issuing an executive order or proclamation ending the state of disaster emergency." Wolf asked the state supreme court to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction, thus removing the case to the high court. The state supreme court held that HR836 was a legal nullity because the Pennsylvania Constitution required that concurrent resolutions relating to emergency declarations be presented to the governor for approval or veto. As the General Assembly did not do so, the court refused to order Wolf to end the shutdown, stating, "The Pennsylvania Constitution does not empower the legislature to act unilaterally to suspend a law, and the Governor’s purported suspension of law did not violate the non-delegation doctrine." Justice David N. Wecht wrote the court's opinion, which Justices Max Baer, Debra Todd, and Christine Donohue joined. Justice Kevin M. Dougherty filed a separate opinion, concurring and dissenting in part.[27]
No retroactive increase in sex offender registration periods
In Commonwealth v. Muniz, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that Pennsylvania’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) could not apply retroactively to a defendant who was found guilty of a sex crime before the legislation took effect.[28] The court ruled that SORNA’s registration requirements constituted a criminal punishment and that the ex post facto clauses of the U.S. and Pennsylvania Constitutions prevented the state from punishing defendants beyond what the law allowed at the time of his or her crime. Justice Donohue joined the majority opinion.
State supreme court judicial selection in Pennsylvania
- See also: Judicial selection in Pennsylvania
The seven justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court are selected in partisan elections.[29]
Justices serve 10-year terms, after which they must run in yes-no retention elections if they wish to remain on the court. A separate part of the ballot is designated for these elections, and justices' names appear without respect to party affiliation.[29][30] To learn more about these elections, visit the Pennsylvania judicial elections page.
Qualifications
To serve on the supreme court, a justice must:
- have state residence for at least one year;
- be a member of the state bar; and
- be under the age of 75.[29][31]
Chief justice
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court chooses its chief justice by seniority; the title is held by the longest-serving justice on the court.[29][32]
Vacancies
In the event of a midterm vacancy, the governor appoints a successor who must be approved by a two-thirds vote of the Pennsylvania Senate. Interim justices stand for election at the next municipal election occurring more than 10 months after the vacancy occurred.[29]
By tradition, appointed interim judges of the supreme court, superior court, or court of appeals do not go on to run for permanent seats. In other words, the governor appoints these judges with the expectation that the judge will only fill the interim vacancy.[29]
The map below highlights how vacancies are filled in state supreme courts across the country.
See also
2025 Elections
External links
Candidate Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Officeholder Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Footnotes
- ↑ We calculated confidence scores by collecting several data points such as party registration, donations, and previous political campaigns.
- ↑ The five possible confidence scores were: Strong Democrat, Mild Democrat, Indeterminate, Mild Republican, and Strong Republican.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedbio
- ↑ Penn Capital Star, "With three seats on the ballot, this year’s state Supreme Court race may be ‘a different animal’," March 3, 2025
- ↑ Politico, "Democrats expand majority on PA Supreme Court," November 7, 2023
- ↑ WESA, "Voters Give Dems Control Of Pennsylvania Supreme Court," November 3, 2015
- ↑ Spotlight PA, "Republicans have a chance to transform the Pa. Supreme Court this year," February 21, 2025
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Spotlight PA, "Pa. primary election 2025: The Commonwealth and Superior Court candidates advancing to November," May 20, 2025
- ↑ PoliticsPA, "Who’s Running For Statewide Court?" March 12, 2025
- ↑ The Philadelphia Inquirer, "Republicans are attempting to boot three Democratic justices from the Pa. Supreme Court — and for the first time, Dems are worried," May 11, 2025
- ↑ The Keystone, "Billionaire-backed group trying to flip control of PA Supreme Court," August 14, 2025
- ↑ Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, "RELEASE: DLCC Adds Majority-Deciding Wisconsin and Pennsylvania State Supreme Court Races to Target Map," February 25, 2025
- ↑ PoliticsPA, "DLCC Adds PA State Supreme Court Race to Target Map," accessed August 14, 2025
- ↑ Pennsylvania Bar Association, "Judicial Evaluation Commission Releases 2015 Judicial Ratings," accessed July 7, 2021
- ↑ Judge Christine Donohue for Supreme Court Justice, "Endorsements and Recommendations," accessed July 7, 2021
- ↑ TribLive.com, "Much at stake as 16 vie for historic 3 vacancies on Pa. Supreme Court," January 11, 2015
- ↑ Pennsylvania Department of State, "Campaign Finance Online Reporting," accessed May 18, 2015
- ↑ TribLive, "3 candidates for Pennsylvania Supreme Court have more than $500k on hand for primary election," April 7, 2015
- ↑ Pennsylvania Department of State, "Campaign Finance Online Reporting," accessed April 22, 2015
- ↑ Philly.com, "5 running for Pa.'s top court agree: Judicial races cost too much," April 8, 2015
- ↑ Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "Senate GOP may not fill 2 vacancies on Pennsylvania’s high court," February 24, 2015
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Philly.com, "Two Supreme Court nominees under fire," February 22, 2015
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Donohue for Justice, "Bio," accessed April 26, 2015
- ↑ The seven factors were party registration, donations made to partisan candidates, donations made to political parties, donations received from political parties or bodies with clear political affiliation, participation in political campaigns, the partisanship of the body responsible for appointing the justice, and state trifecta status when the justice joined the court.
- ↑ An Indeterminate score indicates that there is either not enough information about the justice’s partisan affiliations or that our research found conflicting partisan affiliations.
- ↑ Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, "Wolf v. Scarnati: Opinion," July 1, 2020
- ↑ Pennsylvania Supreme Court, "Commonwealth v. Muniz," July 19, 2017
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 29.4 29.5 American Judicature Society, "Methods of Judicial Selection: Pennsylvania," archived October 3, 2014
- ↑ The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, "In Re: Nomination Papers of Marakay Rogers, Christina Valente and Carl J. Romanelli," November 7, 2006
- ↑ 2018 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, "Title 42, Chapter 33, Section 3351," accessed August 25, 2020
- ↑ The Pennsylvania Code, "Chapter 7. Assignment of Judges," accessed September 3, 2014
|