City of Chula Vista Contracting Charter Amendment, Proposition A (November 2014)

Voting on Labor and Unions
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Local Local labor and unions Local project labor agreements Local pensions

A City of Chula Vista Contracting Charter Amendment, Proposition A ballot question was on the November 4, 2014 election ballot for voters in the city of Chula Vista in San Diego County, California. It was approved.

Proposition A amended the Chula Vista City Charter with regard to public works and contracting as described below.

Election results

City of Chula Vista, Proposition A
Result		Votes	Percentage
a Yes		27,425	76.14%
No		8,594	23.86%

Election results via: San Diego County Registrar of Voters

Text of measure

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

“

Shall the City's Charter provisions regarding public works and general purpose contracting be amended to replace specific contracting procedures with more general contracting principles that would be implemented by ordinance, including the requirement for competitive bidding, City Council approval of major contracts and other best practices, and the requirement that any exceptions to standard competitive purchasing practices be approved by 4/5ths vote of the City Council with findings of public benefit?

”

Impartial analysis

The following impartial analysis was prepared for Measure A:

“	Section 1009 -- Contracts on Public Works The existing Charter contains fairly detailed rules and procedures regarding the award of public works contracts. These include: (1) contracts in excess of $50,000 awarded only after formal advertisement for sealed bids, (2) contracts in excess of $25,000 approved only by City Council; (3) a 10% minimum bidder’s bond requirement; and (4) public works projects using City employees allowed only with a 4/5ths vote of the City Council. This proposed Charter amendment would delete these specific rules and, instead, delegate the authority to make specific rules to the City Council. General rules for public works contracting would still be provided in the Charter. These general rules include the following: a. City Council approval would still be required for what it defines as “major” or “special” contracts, based on contract dollar amounts and other relevant factors; b. Competitive bid processes would still be required, with formal advertisement for bids and sealed bids required for “major” contracts; c. Contracts would still need to be awarded to the lowest “responsive” and “responsible” bidder; d. The ability to reject any and all bids, readvertise for bids, or waive minor defects in bids would be retained, provided that the appropriate City-authority determines that such action is necessary or appropriate for the benefit of the public; e. Emergency authority to waive competitive bid processes would also be allowed if the City Manager determines that the work is of urgent necessity for preservation of life, health or property; and f. Alternatives to standard competitive bidding practices would be allowed, but only as part of a City-wide program, approved by 4/5ths vote of the City Council, with findings of public benefit. The City Council would need to adhere to these general rules when adopting its specific rules. Specific rules would be adopted by ordinance at a public meeting. The amendment would also clarify that public works contracts do not include contracts for routine maintenance. Sections 1010 and 1011 -- Centralized Procurement System and Competitive Bidding for Non-Public Works The changes proposed to Charter Sections 1010 and 1011 are primarily clarifying and reorganizing. The main substantive change proposed is to eliminate language that allows the City to adopt purchasing policies that gives businesses “located within the City” a preference, “quality and prices being equal.” This Charter language is proposed for removal to allow the City to consider other types of local preferences or incentives in its general purchasing policies. Although no specific local preference program or policy for City purchasing has yet been proposed to City Council, City staff is currently evaluating City options in this area. As proposed, any such program, along with any other alternative to standard competitive bidding practices, would only be allowed as part of a City-wide program, approved by 4/5ths vote of the City Council, with findings of public benefit.	”
—City of Chula Vista Attorney

See also

• Local labor and unions on the ballot
• San Diego County, California ballot measures
• November 4, 2014 ballot measures in California

External links

Suggest a link

• San Diego County Elections Office website