Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Cleveland, Ohio, Issue 38, People's Budget Initiative (November 2023)
Cleveland Issue 38 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic City budget and Local elections and campaigns |
|
Status |
|
Type Initiative |
|
Cleveland Issue 38 was on the ballot as an initiative in Cleveland on November 7, 2023. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported creating a participatory budgeting process, called the People's Budget, in Cleveland, allowing residents to propose and vote on city-wide and neighborhood-specific projects using money allocated to the People's Budget Fund. |
A "no" vote opposed estabishing the People's Budget process in Cleveland. |
Election results
Cleveland Issue 38 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 33,156 | 49.11% | ||
34,357 | 50.89% |
Measure design
Issue 38 would have established a People's Budget (also known as participatory budgeting) process allowing residents to make proposals and vote on how to spend a portion of public funds. The initiative would have created the People's Budget Fund to distribute funds. The city would have allocated funds to the People's Budget Fund annually, starting with $350,000 for administrative and implementation costs in the first year. In subsequent years, the allocated amount would have increased to a percentage of the city's general fund: 1% in the second year, 1.5% in the third year, and 2% in the fourth year onward. As of 2023, 2% of the city's general fund is about $14 million.[1]
The initiative would have created the People's Budget Steering Committee to be composed of eleven members: ten Cleveland residents aged 16 or older and one city staff member hired to support the People's Budget process or a city staff member designated by the mayor. Within three months of the adoption of the charter amendment, the mayor would have been directed to create a public application process open to all Cleveland residents aged 16 and older. Within six months of the amendment's adoption, the mayor and city council would have each selected five committee members from the pool of applicants. Under the initiative, the mayor and city council would have been directed to "strive to appoint residents who represent the diversity of Cleveland regarding age, gender, race, geography, LGBTQ+ status, and socioeconomic status."[1]
The People’s Budget process would have spanned over a twelve-month period. Residents aged 13 and over would have been able to propose ideas, develop proposals, and vote on which ones to implement. The People's Budget funds would have been used for capital expenses and time-bound programmatic expenses, with neither category receiving more than 60% of the total funding. The committee would have been responsible for distributing funds for city-wide projects and neighborhood-specific projects, with the allocation within neighborhoods based on poverty data and information about historical and present-day social inequities.[1]
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Issue 38 was as follows:
“ | AMENDMENT TO CHARTER TO ENABLE PEOPLE’S BUDGET PROCESS, ALLOCATE FUNDS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS TO THE PEOPLE’S BUDGET FUND, AND PERMANENTLY ESTABLISH THE PEOPLE’S BUDGET STEERING COMMITTEE | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Support
People's Budget Cleveland (PB CLE) sponsored the initiative.[2]
Supporters
Political Parties
Organizations
- BLM Cleveland
- Building Freedom Ohio
- Cleveland VOTES
- Concerned Citizens Organized Against Lead
- Kings & Queens of Art
- LGBT Center of Greater Cleveland
- NAACP Cleveland
- Northeast Ohio Black Health Coalition
- Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless
- Northeast Ohio Left PAC
- OPAWL – Building AAPI Feminist Leadership
- Our Revolution Ohio
- Showing Up for Racial Justice
- The Carl Stokes Brigade
- The Neighbor Up Network
- The Spot Youth Empowerment
- ThirdSpace Action Lab
- Young Latino Network Cleveland
Arguments
Opposition
Opponents
Officials
- Mayor Justin Bibb (Nonpartisan)
- City Council President Blaine Griffin (Nonpartisan)
Arguments
Background
Participatory budgeting in the U.S.
The first U.S. jurisdiction to implement participatory budgeting was Rogers Park, a neighborhood in Chicago. The ward's alderman, Joe Moore, created a process for resident involvement in spending funds normally allocated at the sole discretion of the ward's alderman. In 2010, 1,652 residents voted on how to allocate $1.3 million. Josh Lerner, co-director of The Participatory Budgeting Project, wrote, "On April 10th, all ward residents age 16 and over, regardless of voter registration or citizenship status, were invited to vote on the proposals at a local high school. In the week beforehand, 428 residents voted early at the Alderman’s office—more early voters per day than during the 2008 presidential election. On the final voting day, a stream of people filled the school cafeteria, reading over proposals, consulting with community representatives, and voting for up to eight projects on paper ballots. In the end, 1,652 residents turned out, not to elect someone to decide for them, but to make their own decisions about the ward. The turnout vastly exceeded expectations, considering the brand-new process, lack of media coverage, and absence of any other elections or ballot measures to inspire turnout. The $1.3 million was enough to fund the 14 most popular projects. The proposal to fix sidewalks received the most votes, and other funded projects included bike lanes, community gardens, murals, traffic signals, and street lighting."[3]
Other U.S. cities that have adopted a process for participatory budgeting include New York City, New York; Vallejo, California; Greensboro, North Carolina; Boston, Massachusetts; Hartford, Connecticut; and Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Path to the ballot
People's Budget Cleveland (PB CLE) sponsored the initiative. The group submitted 10,582 signatures on July 10, 2023. To qualify for the ballot, 5,906 valid signatures (10% of the total votes cast in the previous municipal election) were required. In January 2023, the Cleveland City Council rejected PB CLE's proposal to use $5 million in American Rescue Plan Act funding to create a participatory budget pilot program. PB CLE began collecting signatures for the initiative in May 2023.[4]
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Ohio
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Ohio.
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Cleveland People's Budget, "Text," accessed August 6, 2023
- ↑ PB CLE, "The charter amendment," accessed August 6, 2023
- ↑ Permaculture.org, "CHICAGO’S $1.3 MILLION EXPERIMENT IN DEMOCRACY," accessed August 6, 2023
- ↑ Idea Stream, "'People's Budget' group delivers more than 10,000 signatures to Cleveland City Hall," accessed August 6, 2023
- ↑ Ohio Secretary of State, “Election Day Voting,” accessed April 12, 2023
- ↑ Ohio Secretary of State, “Voter Eligibility & Residency Requirements,” accessed April 12, 2023
- ↑ Ohio Secretary of State, “Register to Vote and Update Your Registration,” accessed April 6, 2023
- ↑ Democracy Docket, “Ohio Governor Signs Strict Photo ID Bill Into Law,” January 6, 2023
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 7, 2024
- ↑ Ohio Secretary of State, "Voter Registration and Information Update Form," accessed November 2, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Ohio Secretary of State, "Identification requirements," accessed Aprl 6, 2023
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
|