Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Colorado Proposition JJ, Retain Sports Betting Tax Revenue for Water Projects Measure (2024)
Colorado Proposition JJ | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date November 5, 2024 | |
Topic Taxes and Gambling | |
Status![]() | |
Type State statute | Origin State legislature |
Colorado Proposition JJ, the Retain Sports Betting Tax Revenue for Water Projects Measure, was on the ballot in Colorado as a legislatively referred state statute on November 5, 2024. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported allowing the state to retain tax revenue collected above $29 million annually from the tax on sports betting proceeds authorized by voters in 2019. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing the state to retain tax revenue collected above $29 million annually from the tax on sports betting proceeds authorized by voters in 2019, thereby requiring the state to refund tax revenue above $29 million to casinos and sports betting operators. |
Election results
Colorado Proposition JJ |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
2,340,370 | 76.44% | |||
No | 721,237 | 23.56% |
Overview
What did the measure do?
- See also: Text of measure
The measure allowed the state to retain tax revenue collected above $29 million annually from the tax on sports betting proceeds (estimated to be $2.8 million in 2023-24, $5.2 million in 2024-25, and $7.2 million in 2025-26). Revenues were to be appropriated to the Water Plan Implementation Cash Fund. If voters had rejected the measure, the state would have been required to refund casinos and sports betting operators any taxes paid above $29 million each year. In 2019, voters approved Proposition DD, which legalized sports betting and enacted a 10% tax on sports betting proceeds. Proposition DD allowed the state to retain $29 million per year to fund state water projects through the Water Plan Implementation Cash Fund.[1]
What was Proposition DD?
- See also: Background
Proposition DD enacted a 10% tax on sports betting proceeds. Net sports betting proceeds equal the total amount wagered minus the payout to bettors minus a 0.25% federal excise tax levied on the total amount wagered. All revenue was designed to be deposited into the Sports Betting Fund. The revenue was designed to be used first and foremost to fund expenses related to the administration and regulation of sports betting in Colorado. Funds were designed to then be distributed to (a) the Hold Harmless Fund, (b) the Office of Behavioral Health to fund the prevention and treatment of gambling addictions or disorders, and (c) the Water Plan Implementation Cash Fund. Voters authorized the state to retain $29 million annually.
Why was this measure on the ballot?
This measure required voter approval under TABOR since it would increase state revenue. The state is expected to generate revenue above $29 million annually, as originally approved by voters, therefore, voter approval is required for the state to retain revenue exceeding the official projections set out under Proposition DD.
In Colorado, a legislatively referred state statute must be passed by a simple majority vote in each chamber of the state legislature. Legislatively referred measures do not need to be signed by the governor. Due to the Colorado TABOR, statewide voter approval is required to enact any legislation to increase government revenue at a faster rate than the combined rate of population increase and inflation. To read about the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, click here.
Since 1992, when TABOR was adopted, through 2023, Colorado voters have decided on 38 statewide ballot measures that were designed to increase revenue for the state, which required voter approval under TABOR. Of the 38 measures, 12 (31.58%) were approved and 26 (68.42%) were defeated.
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for the measure is below:[1]
“ |
WITHOUT RAISING TAXES, MAY THE STATE KEEP AND SPEND ALL SPORTS BETTING TAX REVENUE ABOVE VOTER-APPROVED LIMITS TO FUND WATER CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION PROJECTS INSTEAD OF REFUNDING REVENUE TO CASINOS?[2] |
” |
Full text
The full text of the measure can be read below.
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.
The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 17, and the FRE is 25. The word count for the ballot title is 31.
Support
Supporters
Officials
- Gov. Jared Polis (D)
- State Sen. Dylan Roberts (D)
- State Sen. Cleave Simpson Jr. (R)
- State Rep. Marc Catlin (R)
- State Rep. Julie McCluskie (D)
- State Rep. Emily Sirota (D)
Political Parties
Organizations
Arguments
Opposition
Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure.
Media editorials
- See also: 2024 ballot measure media endorsements
Support
You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Opposition
Campaign finance
Yes on JJ registered to support the measure. The committee reported $515,000 in contributions.[3]
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $515,000.00 | $0.00 | $515,000.00 | $506,313.25 | $506,313.25 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $515,000.00 | $0.00 | $515,000.00 | $506,313.25 | $506,313.25 |
Support
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the measure.[4]
Committees in support of Proposition JJ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Yes on JJ | $515,000.00 | $0.00 | $515,000.00 | $506,313.25 | $506,313.25 |
Total | $515,000.00 | $0.00 | $515,000.00 | $506,313.25 | $506,313.25 |
Donors
The following were the top donors to the support committee.[4]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
Environmental Defense Action Fund | $280,000.00 | $0.00 | $280,000.00 |
Conscience Bay Research | $120,000.00 | $0.00 | $120,000.00 |
Colorado Cattlemen's Association | $50,000.00 | $0.00 | $50,000.00 |
American Rivers Action Fund | $40,000.00 | $0.00 | $40,000.00 |
Opposition
Ballotpedia did not identify a campaign registered to oppose the measure.
Methodology
To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.
Background
Proposition DD of 2019
In 2019, voters approved Proposition DD, which legalized sports betting and enacted a 10% tax on sports betting proceeds. Net sports betting proceeds equal the total amount wagered minus the payout to bettors and minus 0.25% federal excise tax levied on the total amount wagered. All revenue was designed to be deposited into the Sports Betting Fund. The revenue was designed to be used first and foremost to fund expenses related to the administration and regulation of sports betting in Colorado. Funds were designed to then be distributed to (a) the Hold Harmless Fund, (b) the Office of Behavioral Health to fund the prevention and treatment of gambling addictions or disorders, and (c) the Water Plan Implementation Cash Fund.
Proposition DD allowed the state to retain $29 million per year to fund state water projects through the Water Plan Implementation Cash Fund. Since the state expects tax revenues to be greater than the $29 million estimate that was approved by voters, approval is required to retain the revenue.
Recent vote to retain state revenue above official projections
Proposition II on the 2023 ballot asked voters to allow the state to keep and spend revenue exceeding official projections from increased taxes on cigarettes, tobacco, and nicotine products, which voters approved as Proposition EE in 2020. Voters adopted the measure with 68% of voters in favor. The ballot measure allowed the state to keep and utilize excess revenue ($23.65 million) generated from increased and new tobacco, cigarette, and nicotine taxes approved by voters in 2020 through Proposition EE. If the measure had been rejected by voters, excess revenue would have been refunded to distributors and wholesalers and tax rates set by Proposition EE would have been reduced.
Colorado Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR)
The Colorado Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) requires voter approval for all new taxes, tax rate increases, extensions of expiring taxes, mill levy increases, valuation for property assessment increases, or tax policy changes resulting in increased tax revenue.
TABOR limits the amount of money the state of Colorado can take in and spend. It limits the annual increase in state revenue to the prior year's inflation measured by the Denver-Aurora-Lakewood consumer price index plus the estimated previous year's change in the state’s population. Any money collected above this limit is refunded to taxpayers unless the voters allow the state to spend it.
The following sources of revenue are not subject to the TABOR state revenue limit:
- revenue used for refunds to taxpayers;
- gifts;
- federal funds;
- collections for another government;
- pension contributions by employees;
- pension fund earnings;
- transfers or expenditures from reserves;
- damage awards;
- property sales;
- enterprise revenue; and
- voter-approved revenue changes.
TABOR ballot measures
Since 1992, when TABOR was adopted, through 2023, Colorado voters have decided on 38 statewide ballot measures that were designed to increase revenue for the state, which required voter approval under TABOR. Of the 38 measures, 12 (31.58%) were approved and 26 (68.42%) were defeated.
Of the 38 measures, 19 were referred to the ballot by the state legislature and 19 were placed on the ballot through citizen initiative petitions.
- Of the 19 referred measures, 11 (57.89%) were approved and eight (42.10%) were defeated.
- Of the 19 citizen-initiated measures, one (5.26%) was approved and 18 (94.74%) were defeated.
Path to the ballot
The state process
In Colorado, a legislatively referred state statute must be passed by a simple majority vote in each chamber of the state legislature. Legislatively referred measures do not need to be signed by the governor. Due to the Colorado TABOR, statewide voter approval is required to enact any legislation to increase government revenue at a faster rate than the combined rate of population increase and inflation.
The measure was introduced as House Bill 24-1436 on April 1, 2024. The House passed the measure in a vote of 59-1 with five members absent on April 19, 2024. The Senate passed the measure in a vote of 33-2 on May 1, 2024.[5]
|
|
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Colorado
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Colorado.
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Colorado State Legislature, "House Bill 1436," accessed May 8, 2024
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Colorado TRACER, "Yes on JJ," accessed May 20, 2024
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedfinance
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedbill
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Mail-in Ballots FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ LexisNexis, "Colorado Revised Statutes, § 1-7-101," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Voter Registration FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Colorado Voter Registration Form," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Go Vote Colorado," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Acceptable Forms of Identification," accessed August 6, 2025
![]() |
State of Colorado Denver (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |