Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
Colorado Amendment 79, Right to Abortion and Health Insurance Coverage Initiative (2024)
Colorado Amendment 79 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date November 5, 2024 | |
Topic Abortion | |
Status![]() | |
Type Constitutional amendment | Origin Citizens |
Colorado Amendment 79, the Right to Abortion and Health Insurance Coverage Initiative, was on the ballot in Colorado as an initiated constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported creating a right to abortion in the state constitution and allowing the use of public funds for abortion. |
A "no" vote opposed creating a right to abortion in the state constitution and opposes repealing a constitutional provision that bans the use of public funds for abortion. |
Election results
See also: Results for abortion-related ballot measures, 2024
Amendment 79 needed to receive a 55% vote to be approved.
Colorado Amendment 79 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
1,921,593 | 61.97% | |||
No | 1,179,261 | 38.03% |
Overview
What did Amendment 79 do?
- See also: Text of measure
This initiative provided a right to abortion in the state constitution. The initiative prohibited the state or local governments from denying or impeding the right to an abortion. The amendment allowed abortion to be a covered service under health insurance plans. The initiative repealed Section 50 of Article V of the Colorado Constitution, adopted in 1984, which prohibited the use of public funds for abortion.[1][2]
What was the status of abortion in Colorado going into the election?
- See also: Abortion ballot measures in Colorado
Colorado is one of 10 states that does not restrict abortion after a specific point in a pregnancy.
In 1984, Coloradans voted 50.4% to 49.6% to ban public funding of abortion except for cases where the mother's life is in danger. The provision prevented state health insurance from covering abortions for government employees and others on state health insurance plans such as Medicaid. The measure was challenged in 1988 and was upheld by voters. In 1998, Coloradans voted 55% to 45% to require parents to be notified if their minor children seek an abortion and voted 51% to 49% to reject a ban on partial-birth abortion. In 2000, Colorado voters rejected a measure that would have required women to be given certain information from a physician at least 24 hours in advance of an abortion. Coloradans defeated three measures (in 2008, 2010, and 2014) that would have defined person to include fetuses or unborn human beings. In 2020, voters rejected an initiative that would have banned abortions after 22 weeks.[3]
What states have decided on abortion ballot measures in 2022 and 2023?
- See also: History of abortion ballot measures
In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Dobbs. v. Jackson Women's Health Organization that there is no federal constitutional right to abortion and overturned Roe. v. Wade, placing many abortion policy decisions with the states. From 2022 to 2023, seven ballot measures addressing abortion have been on the ballot, with 2022 having the highest number of abortion ballot measures on record in a single year. Four measures—in Vermont, Michigan, and California in 2022, and Ohio in 2023— were sponsored by campaigns that described themselves as pro-choice and created state constitutional rights to abortion. All four measures were approved. Three measures—in Kansas, Kentucky, and Montana— were sponsored by campaigns describing themselves as pro-life and were designed to explicitly provide that there is no right to abortion in the state constitution. All three were defeated.
What states voted on abortion ballot measures in 2024?
The following table provides a list of abortion-related measures that were on the ballot in 2024:
State | Date | Measure | Description | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arizona | Nov. 5, 2024 | Right to Abortion Initiative | • Establishes the fundamental right to abortion that the state of Arizona may not interfere with before the point of fetal viability | ![]() |
Colorado | Nov. 5, 2024 | Right to Abortion Initiative | • Provide a constitutional right to abortion in the state constitution and allow the use of public funds for abortion | ![]() |
Florida | Nov. 5, 2024 | Florida Amendment 4 | • Provide a constitutional right to abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient's health, as determined by the patient's healthcare provider | ![]() |
Maryland | Nov. 5, 2024 | Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment | • Amend the Maryland Constitution to establish a right to reproductive freedom, defined to include "decisions to prevent, continue, or end one's own pregnancy" | ![]() |
Missouri | Nov. 5, 2024 | Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment | • Amend the Missouri Constitution to provide the right for reproductive freedom, and provide that the state legislature may enact laws that regulate abortion after fetal viability | ![]() |
Montana | Nov. 5, 2024 | CI-128, Right to Abortion Initiative | • Amend the Montana Constitution to provide a state constitutional "right to make and carry out decisions about one’s own pregnancy, including the right to abortion" | ![]() |
Nebraska | Nov. 5, 2024 | Prohibit Abortions After the First Trimester Amendment | • Amend the Nebraska Constitution to provide that "unborn children shall be protected from abortion in the second and third trimesters" | ![]() |
Nebraska | Nov. 5, 2024 | Right to Abortion Initiative | • Amend the Nebraska Constitution to provide that "all persons shall have a fundamental right to abortion until fetal viability" | ![]() |
New York | Nov. 5, 2024 | Equal Protection of Law Amendment | • Add language to the New York Bill of Rights to provide that people cannot be denied rights based on their "ethnicity, national origin, age, and disability" or "sex, including sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, and reproductive healthcare and autonomy." | ![]() |
Nevada | Nov. 5, 2024 | Right to Abortion Initiative | • Establish the constitutional right to an abortion, providing for the state to regulate abortion after fetal viability, except where medically indicated to protect the life, physical health, or mental health of the pregnant woman. | ![]() |
South Dakota | Nov. 5, 2024 | Constitutional Amendment G | • Provide a trimester framework for regulating abortion in the South Dakota Constitution | ![]() |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for the initiative was as follows:
“ | Shall there be a change to the Colorado constitution recognizing the right to abortion, and, in connection therewith, prohibiting the state and local governments from denying, impeding, or discriminating against the exercise of that right, allowing abortion to be a covered service under health insurance plans for Colorado state and local government employees and for enrollees in state and local governmental insurance programs?[4] | ” |
Constitutional changes
- See also: Article II, Colorado Constitution
The measure added Section 32 to Article II of the Colorado Constitution and repealed Section 50 of Article V of the Colorado Constitution. The following struck-through text was deleted and underlined text was added.
[2]
Section 32. Abortion.
The right to abortion is hereby recognized. Government shall not deny, impede, or discriminate against the exercise of that right, including prohibiting health insurance coverage for abortion.
...
Section 50. Public Funding of Abortion Forbidden.
No public funds shall be used by the State of Colorado, its agencies or political subdivisions to pay or otherwise reimburse, either directly or indirectly, any person, agency or facility for the performance of any induced abortion, PROVIDED HOWEVER, that the General Assembly, by specific bill, may authorize and appropriate funds to be used for those medical services necessary to prevent the death of either a pregnant woman or her unborn child under circumstances where every reasonable effort is made to preserve the life of each.
[4]
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2024
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state board wrote the ballot language for this measure.
The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 32, and the FRE is -18. The word count for the ballot title is 63.
Support
Coloradans for Protecting Reproductive Freedom led the campaign in support of the initiative. The committee provided a full list of supporters, which is available here.
Supporters
Officials
- U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet (D)
- U.S. Sen. John Hickenlooper (D)
- U.S. Rep. Yadira Caraveo (D)
- U.S. Rep. Jason Crow (D)
- U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette (D)
- U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse (D)
- U.S. Rep. Brittany Pettersen (D)
- Gov. Jared Polis (D)
- State Sen. Jeff Bridges (D)
- State Sen. Janet Buckner (D)
- State Sen. Lisa Cutter (D)
- State Sen. Jessie Danielson (D)
- State Sen. Stephen Fenberg (D)
- State Sen. Rhonda Fields (D)
- State Sen. Julie Gonzales (D)
- State Sen. Chris Hansen (D)
- State Sen. Nick Hinrichsen (D)
- State Sen. Dafna Michaelson Jenet (D)
- State Sen. Chris Kolker (D)
- State Sen. Janice Marchman (D)
- State Sen. Karen McCormick (D)
- State Sen. Dylan Roberts (D)
- State Sen. Robert Rodriguez (D)
- State Sen. Faith Winter (D)
- State Sen. Rachel Zenzinger (D)
- State Rep. Judy Amabile (D)
- State Rep. Jennifer Bacon (D)
- State Rep. Andrew Boesenecker (D)
- State Rep. Lindsey Daugherty (D)
- State Rep. Elisabeth Epps (D)
- State Rep. Meg Froelich (D)
- State Rep. Lorena Garcia (D)
- State Rep. Eliza Hamrick (D)
- State Rep. Tim Hernández (D)
- State Rep. Leslie Herod (D)
- State Rep. Iman Jodeh (D)
- State Rep. Junie Joseph (D)
- State Rep. Chris Kennedy (D)
- State Rep. Cathy Kipp (D)
- State Rep. Sheila Lieder (D)
- State Rep. William Lindstedt (D)
- State Rep. Meghan Lukens (D)
- State Rep. Javier Mabrey (D)
- State Rep. Julie McCluskie (D)
- State Rep. David Ortiz (D)
- State Rep. Manny Rutinel (D)
- State Rep. Emily Sirota (D)
- State Rep. Tammy Story (D)
- State Rep. Brianna Titone (D)
- State Rep. Alex Valdez (D)
- State Rep. Elizabeth Velasco (D)
- State Rep. Stephanie Vigil (D)
- State Rep. Mike Weissman (D)
- State Rep. Jenny Willford (D)
- State Rep. Steven Woodrow (D)
- Mayor of Denver Michael Johnston (Nonpartisan)
- Attorney General Phil Weiser (D)
Political Parties
Organizations
- ACLU of Colorado
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
- Catholics for Choice
- Colorado Cobalt Advocates
- Colorado Immigrant Rights Coalition
- Colorado Nurses Association
- Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights
- League of Women Voters of Colorado
- New Era Colorado
- Progress Now Colorado
- The Interfaith Alliance of Colorado
- Young Invincibles
Arguments
Opposition
Pro-Life Colorado Fund, Coloradans for the Protection of Women and Children, and Vote No on 79 registered to oppose the initiative.
Opponents
Officials
- State Sen. Mark Baisley (R)
- State Rep. Scott Bottoms (R)
- State Rep. Brandi Bradley (R)
Candidates
- Sam Bandimere (R) - Senate Candidate
- Heidi Pitchforth (R) - State House Candidate
Political Parties
Organizations
- Colorado Catholic Conference
- Colorado Right to Life
- El Paso County Young Republicans
- Independence Institute
- March for Life
- Priests for Life
- Truth and Liberty Coalition
Arguments
Media editorials
- See also: 2024 ballot measure media endorsements
Support
Opposition
Campaign finance
Coloradans for Protecting Reproductive Freedom registered to support the measure.[5]
Pro-Life Colorado Fund (also known as Right to Know CO), Coloradans for the Protection of Women and Children, and Vote No on 79 registered to oppose the initiative.
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $8,064,718.91 | $1,715,098.76 | $9,779,817.67 | $7,823,462.90 | $9,538,561.66 |
Oppose | $550,635.68 | $16,259.61 | $566,895.29 | $471,075.84 | $487,335.45 |
Total | $8,615,354.59 | $1,731,358.37 | $10,346,712.96 | $8,294,538.74 | $10,025,897.11 |
Support
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the measure.[6]
Committees in support of Amendment 79 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Coloradans for Protecting Reproductive Freedom | $8,064,718.91 | $1,715,098.76 | $9,779,817.67 | $7,823,462.90 | $9,538,561.66 |
Total | $8,064,718.91 | $1,715,098.76 | $9,779,817.67 | $7,823,462.90 | $9,538,561.66 |
Donors
The following were the top donors to the support committee.[6]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
Cobalt Advocates | $1,105,235.00 | $1,436,648.23 | $2,541,883.23 |
Open Society Policy Center | $1,000,000.00 | $0.00 | $1,000,000.00 |
Michael Bloomberg | $750,000.00 | $0.00 | $750,000.00 |
Cobalt Foundation | $585,000.00 | $0.00 | $585,000.00 |
Institute for Responsive Government Action, Inc. | $510,000.00 | $0.00 | $510,000.00 |
Opposition
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in opposition to the measure.[6]
Committees in opposition to Amendment 79 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Pro-Life Colorado Fund | $383,772.00 | $0.00 | $383,772.00 | $349,369.56 | $349,369.56 |
Vote No on 79 | $87,228.63 | $6,259.61 | $93,488.24 | $51,118.53 | $57,378.14 |
Coloradans for the Protection of Women and Children | $79,635.05 | $10,000.00 | $89,635.05 | $70,587.75 | $80,587.75 |
Total | $550,635.68 | $16,259.61 | $566,895.29 | $471,075.84 | $487,335.45 |
Donors
The following were the top donors to the opposition committees.[6]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
Archdiocese of Denver | $225,000.00 | $0.00 | $225,000.00 |
Andrew Wommack Ministries | $30,000.00 | $0.00 | $30,000.00 |
Truth & Liberty Coalition | $20,000.00 | $0.00 | $20,000.00 |
Colorado for Life | $12,000.00 | $0.00 | $12,000.00 |
Colorado Right to Life Committee | $0.00 | $3,993.61 | $3,993.61 |
Methodology
To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.
Background
Abortion ballot measures in Colorado
Coloradans have voted on nine measures relating to abortion between 1984 and 2020.
In 1984, Coloradans voted 50.4% to 49.6% to ban public funding of abortion except for cases where the mother's life is in danger. The measure was challenged in 1988 and was upheld by voters. In 1998, Coloradans voted 55% to 45% to require parents to be notified if their minor children seek an abortion and voted 51% to 49% to reject a ban on partial-birth abortion. In 2000, Colorado voters rejected a measure that would have required women to be given certain information from a physician at least 24 hours in advance of an abortion. Coloradans rejected three measures (in 2008, 2010, and 2014) that would have defined person to include fetuses or unborn human beings. In 2020, voters rejected an initiative that would have banned abortions after 22 weeks.
Year | Measure | Measure summary | Yes votes % | No votes % | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | Proposition 115, 22-Week Abortion Ban | Prohibit abortions in Colorado after a fetus reaches 22-weeks gestational age | 41.01% | 58.99% | ![]() |
2014 | Amendment 67, Definition of Person | Include unborn human beings under the definition of person and child in the Colorado criminal code and the Colorado Wrongful Death Act | 35.13% | 64.87% | ![]() |
2010 | Initiative 62, Definition of Person | Define "person" to include unborn human beings from the beginning of biological development | 29.57% | 70.53% | ![]() |
2008 | Initiative 48, Defiition of Person | Define person to include any human being from the moment of fertilization | 26.79% | 73.21% | ![]() |
2000 | Initiative 25, Requirements for Consenting to Abortion | Define necessary conditions for a patient to give voluntary, informed consent prior to an abortion; require patients to be given specific information from a physician at least 24 hours in advance of an abortion except in cases of emergency | 39.44% | 60.56% | ![]() |
1998 | Initiative 12, Parental Notification for Abortions Performed on Minors | Require that parents of unemancipated minors be informed if the minor seeks an abortion; create mandatory 48 hour waiting period after the parental notification before the abortion could be performed | 54.87% | 45.13% | ![]() |
1998 | Initiative 11, Partial-Birth Abortion Ban | Ban partial-birth abortions and establish criminal penalties for performing them[7] | 48.52% | 51.48% | ![]() |
1988 | Initiative 7, Repeal Ban on Public Funding for Abortion | Repeal the 1984 measure that prohibited use of public funds for abortion | 39.76% | 60.24% | ![]() |
1984 | Amendment 3, Ban on Public Funding of Abortion | Prohibits use of public funds for abortion; allows legislature to appropriate funds for abortion to prevent the death of the mother | 50.39% | 49.61% | ![]() |
U.S. Supreme Court rulings on abortion
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022)
In 2018, Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a clinic and abortion facility in Mississippi, challenged the constitutionality of the "Gestational Age Act" in federal court. The newly-enacted law prohibited abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy except in cases of medical emergencies or fetal abnormalities. The U.S. district court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, holding that the law was unconstitutional, and put a permanent stop to the law's enforcement. On appeal, the 5th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. Click here to learn more about the case's background. On May 17, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to hear the case.[8]
On June 24, 2022, in a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court of the United States found there was no constitutional right to abortion and overruled Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). In a 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Mississippi's abortion law at issue in the case. Roe v. Wade found that state laws criminalizing abortion prior to fetal viability violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the essential holding of Roe v. Wade but rejected the trimester framework established in the case. The high court affirmed that states could not ban abortions before fetal viability.
Roe v. Wade (1973)
In 1973, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its ruling in Roe v. Wade, finding that state laws criminalizing abortion prior to fetal viability violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The high court held that states can regulate and/or prohibit abortions (except those to preserve the life or health of the mother) once a fetus reaches the point of viability. Roe v. Wade defined fetal viability as "the interim point at which the fetus becomes 'viable,' that is, potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid." The high court further noted that "viability is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."[9]
The ruling established a strict trimester framework to guide state abortion policies. States, according to this framework, were prohibited from banning or regulating abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy. During the second trimester, states were permitted to regulate abortion to protect the mother's health. During the third trimester, states were allowed to ban abortion, except in cases where an abortion is needed to preserve the life or health of the mother.[9]
Abortion regulations by state
- See also: Abortion regulations by state
As of September 4, 2025, 41 states restricted abortions after a certain point in pregnancy.[10] The remaining nine states and Washington, D.C., did not. Of the 41 states with established thresholds for restrictions on abortion:
- Twelve states restrict abortion after conception
- Four states restrict abortion at six weeks post-fertilization
- Two states restrict abortion at 12 weeks post-fertilization
- Zero states restrict abortion at 15 weeks post-fertilization
- One state restricts abortion at 18 weeks since the last menstrual period
- Three states restrict abortion at 20 weeks post-fertilization or 22 weeks after the last menstrual period
- Four states restrict abortion at 24 weeks since the last menstrual period
- Fourteen states restrict abortion at fetal viability
- One state restricts abortion in the third trimester
The maps and table below give more details on state laws restricting abortion based on the stage of pregnancy. Hover over the footnotes in the table for information on legislation pending legal challenges or otherwise not yet in effect.
Some of the terms that are used to describe states' thresholds for abortion restriction include the following:
- Conception: This threshold prohibits all abortions after conception, although some states provide exceptions if the woman's life or health is threatened.[11]
- Fetal heartbeat: This threshold restricts abortions after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which may begin six weeks after the last menstrual period.[12][13]
- Fetal viability: In Roe v. Wade, SCOTUS defined fetal viability. The Supreme Court further noted that "viability is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."[14]
- Last menstrual period: This threshold marks the beginning of a pregnancy from the first day of a woman's last menstrual period.[12]
- Post-fertilization: Thresholds using post-fertilization mark the beginning of pregnancy at the time of conception, which can occur up to 24 hours following intercourse. A threshold of 20 weeks post-fertilization is equivalent to 22 weeks since last menstrual period.[15]
- Post-implantation: Thresholds using post-implantation mark the beginning of pregnancy at the date on which a fertilized egg adheres to the lining of the uterus, roughly five days after fertilization. A threshold of 24 weeks post-implantation is equivalent to 27 weeks since last menstrual period.[15]
Abortion restriction threshold maps
Abortion restrictions by state
State abortion restrictions based on stage of pregnancy | ||
---|---|---|
State | Does the state restrict abortion after a specific point in pregnancy? | Threshold for restriction |
Alabama | Yes | Conception |
Alaska | No | None |
Arizona | Yes | Fetal viability[16][17] |
Arkansas | Yes | Conception |
California | Yes | Fetal viability |
Colorado | No | None |
Connecticut | Yes | Fetal viability |
Delaware | Yes | Fetal viability |
Florida | Yes | Six weeks post-fertilization |
Georgia | Yes | Six weeks post-fertilization |
Hawaii | Yes | Fetal viability |
Idaho[18] | Yes | Conception |
Illinois | Yes | Fetal viability |
Indiana | Yes | Conception |
Iowa | Yes | Six weeks post-fertilization |
Kansas | Yes | 20 weeks since last menstrual period |
Kentucky | Yes | Conception |
Louisiana | Yes | Conception |
Maine | Yes | Fetal viability |
Maryland | No | None |
Massachusetts | Yes | 24 weeks post-fertilization |
Michigan | No | None |
Minnesota | No | None |
Mississippi | Yes | Conception |
Missouri | Yes | Fetal viability[19][20] |
Montana | Yes | Fetal viability |
Nebraska | Yes | 12 weeks post-fertilization |
Nevada | Yes | 24 weeks post-fertilization |
New Hampshire | Yes | 24 weeks since last menstrual period |
New Jersey | No | None |
New Mexico | No | None |
New York | Yes | Fetal viability |
North Carolina | Yes | 12 weeks post-fertilization |
North Dakota | Yes | Fetal viability[21] |
Ohio | Yes | 20 weeks post-fertilization[22] |
Oklahoma | Yes | Conception |
Oregon | No | None |
Pennsylvania | Yes | 24 weeks since last menstrual period |
Rhode Island | Yes | Fetal viability |
South Carolina | Yes | Six weeks post-fertilization |
South Dakota | Yes | Conception |
Tennessee | Yes | Conception |
Texas | Yes | Conception |
Utah | Yes | 18 weeks since last menstrual period |
Vermont | No | None |
Virginia | Yes | Third trimester since last menstrual period |
Washington | Yes | Fetal viability |
Washington, D.C. | No | None |
West Virginia | Yes | Conception |
Wisconsin | Yes | 20 weeks post-fertilization |
Wyoming | Yes | Fetal viability |
Sources:Guttmacher Institute, "State Policies on Later Abortions," accessed August 16, 2024; CNA, "TRACKER: Check the status of abortion trigger laws across the U.S.," accessed August 16, 2024; The Fuller Project, "How major abortion laws compare, state by state," accessed August 16, 2024 |
History of abortion ballot measures
- See also: History of abortion ballot measures
In 2022, there were six ballot measures addressing abortion — the most on record for a single year. Measures were approved in California, Michigan, and Vermont. Measures were defeated in Kansas, Kentucky, and Montana.
From 1970 to November 2022, there were 53 abortion-related ballot measures, and 43 (81%) of these had the support of organizations that described themselves as pro-life. Voters approved 11 (26%) and rejected 32 (74%) of these 43 ballot measures. The other 10 abortion-related ballot measures had the support of organizations that described themselves as pro-choice or pro-reproductive rights. Voters approved seven (70%) and rejected three (30%).
Before Roe v. Wade in 1973, three abortion-related measures were on the ballot in Michigan, North Dakota, and Washington, and each was designed to allow abortion in its respective state.
The following graph shows the number of abortion-related ballot measures per year since 1970:
Constitutional rights
The topic constitutional rights addresses ballot measures that establish a state constitutional right to abortion. Campaigns that support these measures often describe themselves as pro-choice or pro-reproductive rights.
Constitutional interpretation
The topic constitutional interpretation addresses ballot measures designed to provide that state constitutions cannot be interpreted to establish a state constitutional right to abortion. These types of amendments are designed to address previous and future state court rulings on abortion that have prevented or could prevent legislatures from passing certain abortion laws. Campaigns that support these measures often describe themselves as pro-life.
State | Year | Measure | Yes | No | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kansas | 2022 | No State Constitutional Right to Abortion and Legislative Power to Regulate Abortion Amendment | 41.03% | 58.97% | ![]() |
Kentucky | 2022 | No State Constitutional Right to Abortion Amendment | 47.65% | 52.35% | ![]() |
Louisiana | 2020 | Amendment 1: No Right to Abortion in Constitution Amendment | 62.06% | 37.94% | ![]() |
Alabama | 2018 | Amendment 2: State Abortion Policy Amendment | 59.01% | 40.99% | ![]() |
West Virginia | 2018 | Amendment 1: No Right to Abortion in Constitution Measure | 51.73% | 48.27% | ![]() |
Tennessee | 2014 | Amendment 1: No State Constitutional Right to Abortion and Legislative Power to Regulate Abortion Amendment | 52.60% | 47.40% | ![]() |
Florida | 2012 | Amendment 6: State Constitution Interpretation and Prohibit Public Funds for Abortions Amendment | 44.90% | 55.10% | ![]() |
Massachusetts | 1986 | Question 1: No State Constitutional Right to Abortion and Legislative Power to Regulate Abortion Amendment | 41.83% | 58.17% | ![]() |
Path to the ballot
The state process
In Colorado, the number of signatures required to qualify an initiated constitutional amendment for the ballot is equal to 5 percent of the total number of votes cast for the office of Colorado secretary of state in the preceding general election. For initiated constitutional amendments, signature gathering must be distributed to include signatures equal to 2 percent of the registered voters who live in each of the state's 35 senate districts.
State law provides that petitioners have six months to collect signatures after the ballot language and title are finalized. State statutes require a completed signature petition to be filed three months and three weeks before the election at which the measure would appear on the ballot. The Constitution, however, states that the petition must be filed three months before the election at which the measure would appear. The secretary of state generally lists a date that is three months before the election as the filing deadline.
Constitutional amendments in Colorado require a 55% supermajority vote to be ratified and added to the state constitution. This requirement was added by Amendment 71 of 2016.
The requirements to get an initiated constitutional amendment certified for the 2024 ballot:
- Signatures: 124,238 valid signatures
- Deadline: August 5, 2024
The secretary of state is responsible for signature verification. Verification is conducted through a review of petitions regarding correct form and then a 5 percent random sampling verification. If the sampling projects between 90 percent and 110 percent of required valid signatures, a full check of all signatures is required. If the sampling projects more than 110 percent of the required signatures, the initiative is certified. If less than 90 percent, the initiative fails.
Details about this initiative
- The initiative was filed by Dusti Gurule and Dani Newsum.[1]
- The signature drive for the initiative was launched on January 22, 2024, with signatures due by April 26, 2024.[1][24]
- Signatures were submitted for the initiative on April 18, 2024. Proponents reported gathering over 225,000 signatures.[25]
- On May 17, 2024, the Colorado Secretary of State announced that the initiative qualified for the ballot. Proponents submitted 225,688 total signatures, of which, 159,930 were found to be valid.[26]
Signature gathering cost
Sponsors of the measure hired Fieldworks LLC to collect signatures for the petition to qualify this measure for the ballot. A total of $2,991,718.21 was spent to collect the 124,238 valid signatures required to put this measure before voters, resulting in a total cost per required signature (CPRS) of $24.08.
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Colorado
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Colorado.
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Colorado Secretary of State, "Initiative Filings," accessed April 21, 2023
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Initiative 89 full text," accessed April 19, 2024
- ↑ The Hill, "Abortion initiative clears signature threshold to get on Colorado ballot," accessed April 19, 2024
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Colorado TRACER, "COLORADANS FOR PROTECTING REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM," accessed April 22, 2024
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedfinance
- ↑ Partial-birth abortion would have been defined as those abortions performed by someone who, "deliberately and intentionally causes to be delivered into the vagina a living human fetus or any substantive portion thereof for the purpose of performing any procedure the person knows will kill the fetus and kills the fetus before completing delivery."
- ↑ SCOTUSblog, "Court to weigh in on Mississippi abortion ban intended to challenge Roe v. Wade," May 17, 2021
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Cornell University Law School, "Roe v. Wade," accessed April 27, 2017
- ↑ Note: Exceptions to these thresholds are generally provided when pregnancy threatens the mother's life or health.
- ↑ The Fuller Project, "How major abortion laws compare, state by state," accessed December 4, 2022
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Kaiser Family Foundation, "States with Gestational Limits for Abortion," August 1, 2020
- ↑ Guttmacher Institute, "State Bans on Abortion Throughout Pregnancy," September 1, 2021
- ↑ Supreme Court of the United States, Roe v. Wade, January 22, 1973
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Guttmacher Institute, "The Implications of Defining When a Woman Is Pregnant," May 9, 2005
- ↑ Voters approved Proposition 139 on November 5, 2024, amending the state constitution to provide for the fundamental right to abortion, among other provisions. The amendment was set to go into effect once Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) certified the election results following the November 25, 2024, canvass deadline.
- ↑ Axios, "When Arizona's new abortion measure will take effect," November 7, 2024
- ↑ In a 6-3 decision in Moyle v. United States (consolidated with Idaho v. United States), the U.S. Supreme Court on June 27, 2024, reinstated a U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho ruling that temporarily blocked the state of Idaho from enforcing the part of a 2022 law that barred abortion in case of certain medical emergencies.
- ↑ Voters approved Amendment 3, which provided for a right to abortion in the state constitution. The amendment was set to take effect 30 days after the election.
- ↑ Missouri Independent, "Missouri voters approve Amendment 3, overturn state’s abortion ban," November 5, 2024
- ↑ On September 12, 2024, a state judge ruled against North Dakota's abortion ban. The state appealed the ruling, and litigation is ongoing.
- ↑ Ohio voters approved Issue 1 in 2023, allowing the state to restrict abortion only after fetal viability. However, the state's previous restrictions on abortion—such as SB 127, which banned abortion at 20 weeks post-fertilization—remained on the books. As of August 2024, courts had not weighed in on the interaction between Issue 1 and the older laws.
- ↑ Note: Florida Amendment 4 needed to receive a 60% vote to be approved.
- ↑ NBC News, "Colorado abortion rights groups formally launch 2024 ballot measure effort," accessed January 22, 2024
- ↑ Yahoo, "Colorado abortion access amendment has enough signatures to make 2024 election ballot, organizers say," accessed April 19, 2024
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Proposed Initiative #89 Qualifies for General Election Ballot," accessed May 18, 2024
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Mail-in Ballots FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ LexisNexis, "Colorado Revised Statutes, § 1-7-101," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Voter Registration FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Colorado Voter Registration Form," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Go Vote Colorado," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Acceptable Forms of Identification," accessed August 6, 2025
![]() |
State of Colorado Denver (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |