Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
Colorado Tax Deductions and Revenue for School Meals Measure (2025)
Colorado Tax Deductions and Revenue for School Meals Measure | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Income taxes and Public education funding |
|
Status On the ballot |
|
Type Legislatively referred state statute |
Origin |
The Colorado Tax Deductions and Revenue for School Meals Measure is on the ballot in Colorado as a legislatively referred state statute on November 4, 2025.
A "yes" vote supports lowering the state income tax deduction limits for taxpayers earning $300,000 or more from $12,000 to $1,000 for single filers and from $16,000 to $2,000 for joint filers, generating an additional $95 million annually for the Healthy School Meals for All Program. |
A "no" vote opposes lowering state income tax deduction limits to provide an additional $95 million annually Healthy School Meals for All Program, thereby leaving in place the current limits of $12,000 for single filers and $16,000 for joint filers. |
Overview
The Colorado State Legislature passed House Bill 1274, which referred two measures to the 2025 ballot—a retention measure and an expansion measure—concerning tax revenue for the Healthy School Meals for All Program created by voter approval of Proposition FF in 2022.[1][2]
What would this measure do?
- See also: Text of measure
This measure, known as the expansion measure, would further reduce the allowable state income tax deductions for approximately 194,000 taxpayers with federal taxable income over $300,000 according to a fiscal note prepared by the Colorado Legislative Council Staff. Specifically, it would lower the deduction limits established by Proposition FF from $12,000 to $1,000 for single filers and from $16,000 to $2,000 for joint filers. The expansion was expected to increase taxes by $377 for a single filer and $560 for joint filers.[1][2]
This measure would increase $95 million in taxes annually revenue to support the Healthy School Meals for All Program. The revenue would be exempt from TABOR as a voter-approved revenue change.[1][2]
How does this measure relate to the retention measure also on the ballot in 2025?
The other measure, known as the retention measure, would allow the state to retain and spend $11.3 million in tax revenue collected above the initial estimates for Proposition FF. In 2022, voters approved Proposition FF, which limited itemized and standard deductions to state income tax for individuals with federal taxable incomes over $300,000. Under Proposition FF, the measure was estimated to generate $100,727,820 annually to fund the Healthy School Meals for All Program.[1][2]
What are the possible outcomes based on approval or rejection of the retention and expansion measures?
The following table shows the outcomes depending on whether the measures are approved or rejected.[1][2]
Retention and Expansion measure | Proposition FF revenue collected above voter-approved amount | State income tax deductions cap | Additional revenue | Healthy School Meals for All program |
---|---|---|---|---|
Both approved | Retained | Reduced to $1,000 for single and $2,000 for joint filers | +$95M annually | Program continues and expands |
Both rejected | Refunded (+10% interest) | No change | None | Program ends after FY 2025–26 |
Retention only | Retained | No change | +$9.6M (FY 2026–27) | Program continues; grant eligibility revised |
Expansion only | Refunded (+10% interest) | Reduced to $1,000 for single and $2,000 for joint filers | +$105M (FY 2026–27) | Program continues |
What was Proposition FF?
- See also: Background
Proposition FF was approved in 2022 with 57% of voters in favor and 43% of voters opposed. Proposition FF reduced income tax deduction amounts for those earning $300,000 or more from $30,000 for single filers and $60,000 for joint filers to $12,000 for single filers and $16,000 for joint filers. Proposition FF created the Healthy School Meals for All Program to reimburse participating schools for free meals provided to students and provide schools with food-related funding. The measure was expected to generate $100,727,820 in tax revenue for the program annually.[1][2]
Why is this measure on the ballot?
Due to the Colorado TABOR, statewide voter approval is required to enact any legislation to increase government revenue at a faster rate than the combined rate of population increase and inflation. To read about the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, click here.
This measure requires voter approval under the Colorado Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) since it would increase state revenue.[1][2] Since 1992, when TABOR was adopted, through 2024, Colorado voters have decided on 40 statewide ballot measures that were designed to increase revenue for the state, which required voter approval under TABOR. Of the 40 measures, 14 (35%) were approved and 26 (65%) were defeated.
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for this measure is below.[3]
“ | SHALL STATE TAXES BE INCREASED BY $95 MILLION ANNUALLY BY A CHANGE TO THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES TO SUPPORT ACCESS TO HEALTHY FOOD FOR COLORADO KIDS AND FAMILIES, INCLUDING THE HEALTHY SCHOOL MEALS FOR ALL PROGRAM, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, INCREASING STATE TAXABLE INCOME ONLY FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE A FEDERAL TAXABLE INCOME OF $300,000 OR MORE BY LIMITING ITEMIZED OR STANDARD STATE INCOME TAX DEDUCTIONS TO $1,000 FOR SINGLE TAX RETURN FILERS AND $2,000 FOR JOINT TAX RETURN FILERS FOR THE PURPOSES OF FULLY FUNDING THE HEALTHY SCHOOL MEALS FOR ALL PROGRAM TO CONTINUE PAYING FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO OFFER FREE BREAKFAST AND LUNCH TO ALL PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENTS WHILE ALSO INCREASING WAGES FOR EMPLOYEES WHO PREPARE AND SERVE SCHOOL MEALS, HELPING SCHOOLS USE BASIC, NUTRITIOUS INGREDIENTS INSTEAD OF PROCESSED PRODUCTS, AND ENSURING THAT COLORADO GROWN AND RAISED PRODUCTS ARE PART OF SCHOOL MEALS; SUPPORTING THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) THAT HELPS LOW-INCOME COLORADO FAMILIES AFFORD GROCERIES; AND ALLOWING THE STATE TO RETAIN AND SPEND AS A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE ALL ADDITIONAL TAX REVENUE GENERATED BY THESE TAX DEDUCTION CHANGES?[4] | ” |
Full text
The full text of the ballot measure is below:[3]
Support
Supporters
Officials
- State Sen. Judy Amabile (D)
- State Sen. Jeff Bridges (D)
- State Sen. James Coleman (D)
- State Sen. Lisa Cutter (D)
- State Sen. Lindsey Daugherty (D)
- State Sen. Thomas Exum Sr. (D)
- State Sen. Julie Gonzales (D)
- State Sen. Nick Hinrichsen (D)
- State Sen. Dafna Michaelson Jenet (D)
- State Sen. Iman Jodeh (D)
- State Sen. Cathy Kipp (D)
- State Sen. Janice Marchman (D)
- State Sen. Kyle Mullica (D)
- State Sen. Dylan Roberts (D)
- State Sen. Robert Rodriguez (D)
- State Sen. Tom Sullivan (D)
- State Sen. Katie Wallace (D)
- State Sen. Mike Weissman (D)
- State Sen. Faith Winter (D)
- State Rep. Jennifer Bacon (D)
- State Rep. Andrew Boesenecker (D)
- State Rep. Kyle Brown (D)
- State Rep. Sean Camacho (D)
- State Rep. Michael Carter (D)
- State Rep. Chad Clifford (D)
- State Rep. Monica Duran (D)
- State Rep. Regina English (D)
- State Rep. Meg Froelich (D)
- State Rep. Lorena Garcia (D)
- State Rep. Lindsay Gilchrist (D)
- State Rep. Eliza Hamrick (D)
- State Rep. Jamie Jackson (D)
- State Rep. Sheila Lieder (D)
- State Rep. Mandy Lindsay (D)
- State Rep. William Lindstedt (D)
- State Rep. Javier Mabrey (D)
- State Rep. Matthew Martinez (D)
- State Rep. Karen McCormick (D)
- State Rep. Amy Paschal (D)
- State Rep. Jacque Phillips (D)
- State Rep. Naquetta Ricks (D)
- State Rep. Manny Rutinel (D)
- State Rep. Emily Sirota (D)
- State Rep. Katie Stewart (D)
- State Rep. Tammy Story (D)
- State Rep. Brianna Titone (D)
- State Rep. Elizabeth Velasco (D)
- State Rep. Jenny Willford (D)
- State Rep. Steven Woodrow (D)
- State Rep. Yara Zokaie (D)
Organizations
Arguments
Opposition
Opponents
Officials
- State Rep. Lori Sander (R)
Arguments
Campaign finance
- See also: Ballot measure campaign finance, 2025
If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this measure, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Background
Proposition FF (2022)
Proposition FF was on the November 2022 ballot and was approved with 57% of voters in favor and 43% opposed. The measure reduced state income tax deduction limits for those earning $300,000 or more from $30,000 for single filers and $60,000 for joint filers to $12,000 for single filers and $16,000 for joint filers. Proposition FF created the Healthy School Meals for All Program and allocated revenue from the deduction change to fund it. The program reimburses participating schools to provide free meals to students and provide schools with local food purchasing grants and school food-related funding.
Proposition FF was estimated to increase state revenue by $100,727,820 annually.
Supporters and opponents of Proposition FF
Healthy School Meals for All Colorado Students led the campaign in support of Proposition FF. Healthy School Meals for All and Hunger Free Colorado said, "The free and reduced-price meals program income threshold is too low to truly account for children and families facing food insecurity. School Meals for All would eliminate lunch debts so families can focus on other needs like housing, utilities, and more. It would also prevent students from feeling stigma or shame when their families can't pay for lunch. The ballot initiative would raise $100 million per year to cover the costs of the program through the closure of tax loopholes for high-income earners."[5]
Opponents of Proposition FF included the Independence Institute. Jon Caldara, president of the Independence Institute, said, "This is a really stupid idea. This proposal is, hey, let's get the rich guys to buy our kids lunch."[6] State Representative Richard Holtorf (R), who voted against the bill in the state House, said, "My kids are all grown, but if I had kids, how can I sit here and say my kids should have a free lunch if I’m making six figures? I don’t think that’s right. So I have a fundamental problem with the premise of the bill. People that could afford to pay need to pay to subsidize programs needed to help the people who need the subsidies."[7]
Healthy School Meals for All programs
As of April 2025, Colorado was one of eight states to adopt a program providing school meals to students free of cost regardless of income. The other seven states include California, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Vermont.[8]
Recent revenue retention measures
This measure, known as the expansion measure, was placed on the ballot alongside the retention measure. The retention measure asks voters whether the state can retain and spend revenue collected above the original amount approved by voters. Recent revenue retention measures were on the ballot in Colorado in 2023 and 2024, and both were approved.
2024: Voters approved Proposition JJ, which allowed the state to retain tax revenue collected above $29 million annually from the tax on sports betting proceeds authorized by voters through Proposition DD in 2019.
2023: Voters approved Proposition II, which allowed the state to keep and spend revenue exceeding official projections from increased taxes on cigarettes, tobacco, and nicotine products, which voters approved as Proposition EE in 2020.
TABOR ballot measures
Since 1992, when TABOR was adopted, through 2024, Colorado voters have decided on 40 statewide ballot measures that were designed to increase revenue for the state, which required voter approval under TABOR. Of the 40 measures, 14 (35%) were approved and 26 (65%) were defeated.
Of the 40 measures, 21 were referred to the ballot by the state legislature and 19 were placed on the ballot through citizen initiative petitions.
- Of the 21 referred measures, 13 (61.90%) were approved and eight (38.10%) were defeated.
- Of the 19 citizen-initiated measures, one (5.26%) was approved and 18 (94.74%) were defeated.
Note: This list includes measures that were required to be referred to the ballot for voter approval under TABOR. The list does not include every ballot measure that may have had a potential effect on TABOR refund amounts.
Ballot measure | Type | Year | Purpose | Outcome | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referendum A | LRSS | 1993 | New tax | ![]() |
Reinstated the 0.2 percent sales tax on tourist-related items that were eliminated by a TABOR amendment and used funds for statewide tourism marketing and promotional programs by the Colorado Tourism Board |
Amendment 1 | CICA | 1994 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Increase tobacco taxes for health care, educational programs to reduce tobacco use and research concerning tobacco use and tobacco-related illnesses |
Referendum D | BI | 1996 | Retain and spend revenue | ![]() |
Excluded funds for state unemployment compensation from fiscal limitations |
Initiative 1 | CICA/SS | 1997 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Increase taxes to fund the Transportation Department through increases in the fuel excise tax by 5¢ per gallon, the motor vehicle registration fee by $10 and a new tax of $100 on the initial registration of certain motor vehicles |
Referendum B | LRSS | 1998 | Retain and spend revenue | ![]() |
Allow the state to keep up to two hundred million dollars in excess revenue for the funding of school district capital construction projects, state and local transportation needs and capital construction projects of state colleges and universities |
Referendum A | BI | 1999 | Debt increase (bond issue) | ![]() |
Increase debt by issuing bonds to fund transportation projects |
Referendum E | LRSS | 2000 | Retain and spend revenue | ![]() |
Create multistate lottery and retain and spend proceeds to use for education funding |
Referendum F | LRSS | 2000 | Retain and spend revenue | ![]() |
Retain and spend funds for the 1999-2000 fiscal year and for four succeeding fiscal years for the purpose of funding performance grants for school districts to improve academic performance in math and science |
Referendum A | BI | 2001 | Debt increase (bond issue) | ![]() |
Increase debt by issuing bonds and using revenue to fund the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund |
Amendment 26 | CISS | 2001 | Retain and spend revenue | ![]() |
Retain and spend revenue to fund the creation a fixed guideway transportation system connecting the Denver International Airport and Eagle County Airport |
Referendum A | BI | 2003 | Debt increase (bond issue) | ![]() |
Increase debt by issuing bonds and retaining bond proceeds as a voter-approved revenue change |
Amendment 33 | CICA | 2003 | New tax | ![]() |
Create video lottery and collect taxes and fees to fund tourism promotion |
Initiative 32 | CICA | 2003 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Set property tax valuation and eliminate the annual adjustment of the ratio that insures that the percentage of the total statewide assessed value attributable to residential real property remains the same as it was in the previous year |
Amendment 35 | CICA | 2004 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Increase tobacco tax to pay for educational and preventative medicine health programs |
Referendum D | BI | 2005 | Debt increase (bond issue) | ![]() |
Increase debt by issuing bonds and retaining bond proceeds as a voter-approved revenue change |
Referendum C | LRSS | 2005 | Retain and spend revenue | ![]() |
Retain and spend revenue collected over its TABOR limit for five years on health care, public education, transportation projects, and local fire and police pensions; created a new "Referendum C Cap" on state revenue |
Referendum H | LRSS | 2006 | Eliminate tax exemption | ![]() |
Eliminated a state income tax benefit for businesses employing undocumented immigrants |
Amendment 58 | CICA/SS | 2008 | Tax increase; eliminating severance tax credit and reducing certain exemptions | ![]() |
Increase the oil and gas severance tax and eliminated a property-tax deduction against the tax to fund college scholarships, wildlife presevation, energy efficiency programs, transportation projects, and water projects |
Amendment 51 | CICA | 2008 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Increase sales tax rate to provide funding for long-term services for persons with developmental disabilities. |
Proposition 103 | CICA/SS | 2011 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Increase income tax rate and sales tax rate |
Proposition AA | LRSS | 2013 | New tax | ![]() |
Establish taxes on marijuana sales |
Amendment 66 | CICA | 2013 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Increase income tax rates |
Amendment 68 | CICA | 2014 | New tax | ![]() |
Creating a new tax on horse race gambling and dedicating revenue to fund education |
Proposition BB | LRSS | 2015 | Retain and spend revenue above previously-authorized estimates | ![]() |
Retain $66 million in collected marijuana tax revenue that exceeded Blue Book estimates (Proposition AA of 2013) |
Amendment 69 | CICA | 2016 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Increase payroll taxes to fund universal healthcare coverage for Colorado residents |
Amendment 72 | CICA | 2016 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Increase tobacco tax to fund health and education programs |
Amendment 73 | CICA/SS | 2018 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Establish an income tax bracket system rather than a flat income tax rate and increase income taxes for individuals earning more than $150,000 per year |
Proposition 109 | CISS | 2018 | Debt increase (bond issue) | ![]() |
Increase debt by issuing bonds of up to $3,500,000,000, with a maximum repayment cost of $5,200,000,000, with proceeds to be retained as a voter-approved revenue change and spent on transportation projects |
Proposition 110 | CISS | 2018 | Tax increase; debt increase (bond issue) | ![]() |
Increase state sales tax and increase state debt to fund transportation projects |
Proposition CC | LRSS | 2019 | Retain and spend revenue | ![]() |
Allow the state to retain and spend all the revenue it annually collects after June 30, 2019, to provide funding for transportation and education |
Proposition DD | LRSS | 2019 | New tax | ![]() |
Legalize sports betting and establish a tax on sports betting operator proceeds to fund state water projects |
Proposition EE | LRSS | 2020 | Tax increase; new tax | ![]() |
Establish a tax on nicotine products such as e-cigarettes, increase cigarette and tobacco taxes; and dedicate revenues to various health and education programs |
Amendment 78 | CICA/SS | 2021 | Retain and spend revenue | ![]() |
Allow the state to retain and spend all custodial money and earnings and revenue on that custodial money as a voter-approved revenue change |
Proposition 119 | CISS | 2021 | Tax increase | ![]() |
Increase marijuana sales tax and establish a program for out-of-school learning |
Proposition 120 | CISS | 2021 | Retain and spend revenue | ![]() |
Increase sales tax to create a home and community-based services fund |
Proposition FF | LRSS | 2022 | Reduce income tax deductions | ![]() |
Reduce income tax deduction amounts and use revenues to fund school meals program |
Proposition HH | LRSS | 2023 | Reduce income tax deductions | ![]() |
Change property tax rates and state revenue limits (reducing residential property tax assessment rates and reduce TABOR refund amounts) |
Proposition II | LRSS | 2023 | Retain and spend revenue above previously-authorized estimates | ![]() |
Allow the state to keep and utilize excess revenue ($23.65 million) generated from increased and new tobacco, cigarette, and nicotine taxes approved by voters in 2020 through Proposition EE |
Proposition JJ | LRSS | 2024 | Retain and spend revenue above previously-authorized estimates | ![]() |
Allow the state to retain tax revenue collected above $29 million annually from the tax on sports betting proceeds authorized by voters in 2019 |
Proposition KK | LRSS | 2024 | New tax | ![]() |
Levy a 6.5% excise tax on the manufacture and sale of firearms and ammunition to be imposed on firearms dealers, manufacturers, and ammunition vendors and appropriating the revenue to the Firearms and Ammunition Excise Tax Cash Fund to be used to fund crime victim services programs, mental and behavioral health programs for children and veterans, and school security and safety programs |
Path to the ballot
Amending the Colorado Constitution
- See also: Amending the Colorado Constitution
A simple majority vote is required during one legislative session for the Colorado State Legislature to place a state statute on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 33 votes in the Colorado House of Representatives and 18 votes in the Colorado State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Statutes do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.
The Colorado Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) requires voter approval for new taxes, tax rate increases, extensions of expiring taxes, mill levy increases, valuation for property assessment increases, or tax policy changes resulting in increased tax revenue.
Colorado House Bill 1274 (2025)
The following is the timeline of the measure in the state legislature:[1]
- February 19, 2025: Colorado House Bill 1274 (HB 1274) was introduced into the state House of Representatives. Rep. Lorena Garcia (D-35) and Sens. Dafna Michaelson Jenet (D-21) and Katie Wallace (D-17) were listed as the prime sponsors.
- March 6, 2025: The House Education Committee voted 7-5 to send the legislation to the Committee on Finance.
- March 10, 2025: The House Finance Committee voted 7-6 to send the legislation to the Committee on Appropriations.
- March 11, 2025: The House Appropriations Committee voted 8-3 to send the legislation to the Committee of the Whole.
- April 21, 2025: The House of Representatives voted 40-22, with three members not voting, to pass HB 1274.
- April 24, 2025: The Senate Finance Committee voted 6-3 to refer the legislation to the Committee on Appropriations.
- April 30, 2025: The Senate Appropriations Committee voted 4-3 to refer the legislation to the Committee of the Whole.
- May 6, 2025: The Senate voted 24-11 to approved an amended version of HB 1274.
- May 7, 2025: As HB 1274 was amended in the Senate, concurrence was required from the House. The House of Representatives voted 42-22, with one member not voting, to pass HB 1274.
- June 3, 2025: Gov. Jared Polis (D) signed HB 1274.
Learn more about the ballot measures PDI →
Votes Required to Pass: 18 | |||
Yes | No | NV | |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 24 | 11 | 0 |
Total % | 68.6% | 31.4% | 0.0% |
Democratic (D) | 23 | 0 | 0 |
Republican (R) | 1 | 11 | 0 |
Votes Required to Pass: 33 | |||
Yes | No | NV | |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 42 | 22 | 1 |
Total % | 64.6% | 33.8% | 1.5% |
Democratic (D) | 42 | 0 | 1 |
Republican (R) | 0 | 22 | 0 |
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Colorado
See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Colorado.
See also
|
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Colorado State Legislature, "House Bill 1274," accessed May 9, 2025
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Colorado Legislative Council Staff, "HB 25-1274: HEALTHY SCHOOL MEALS FOR ALL PROGRAM Fiscal Note," accessed May 9, 2025
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedText
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Healthy School Meals for All, "Fact sheet," accessed June 1, 2022
- ↑ APR, "Colorado voters to vote on universal free school lunches," accessed May 19, 2025
- ↑ Colorado Newsline, "To fund school meals, bill proposes raising taxes on high earners," accessed June 1, 2022
- ↑ Food Research and Action Center, "Healthy School Meals for All report," accessed May 23, 2025
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Mail-in Ballots FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ LexisNexis, "Colorado Revised Statutes, § 1-7-101," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Voter Registration FAQs," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Colorado Secretary of State, "Colorado Voter Registration Form," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Go Vote Colorado," accessed August 6, 2025
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Colorado Secretary of State, "Acceptable Forms of Identification," accessed August 6, 2025